Source: Facebook

  • WE HAVE NO COMMON COUNTRY ANY LONGER – Clarence Thomas Justice Clarence Thomas s

    WE HAVE NO COMMON COUNTRY ANY LONGER – Clarence Thomas

    Justice Clarence Thomas stated that he doesn’t know what Americans can say they have in common as a country.

    Host Laura Ingraham asked Thomas, “Are you surprised that — how things are still so rancorous in the United States today about foundational issues? Not about — just foundational issues, the anthem and so forth?”

    He answered, “No, I’m not surprised. I mean, what binds us? What do we all have in common anymore? I think we have to think about that. I think this is — when I was a kid, even as we had laws that held us apart, there were things that we held dear and that we all had in common. And I think we have to — we always talk about E pluribus unum. What’s our unum now? We have the pluribus. What’s the unum? And I think it’s a great country. I think we, for whatever reasons, have made it our — some people have decided that the Constitution isn’t worth defending, that history isn’t worth defending, that the culture and principles aren’t worth defending. And, certainly, if you are in my position, they have to be worth defending. That’s what keeps you going. That’s what energizes you. … I don’t know what it is that we have, we can say instinctively, we have as a country in common.”

    Asked about by his judicial philosophy, Thomas, widely viewed as a conservative and a strict constructionist, said it is quite simple. “I think it’s ‘Get it right,’” said Thomas. “I think we have to be careful not to take outcomes that we want and backwash that into the process of decision-making. So you don’t reach a decision and then force the process. You use the process … You don’t justify the outcome, you reason to the outcome.”

    Thomas said he defends the Constitution.”Some people have decided that the Constitution isn’t worth defending, that history isn’t worth defending,” he said. “Certainly, if you’re in my position, they have to be worth defending.”


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 17:34:00 UTC

  • Propertarian Contracts, Legislation, and Laws will ‘compile’ or they will not. T

    Propertarian Contracts, Legislation, and Laws will ‘compile’ or they will not. They will not be open to interpretation.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 17:28:00 UTC

  • “The pen serves to multiply the swords.”—Steve Pender

    –“The pen serves to multiply the swords.”—Steve Pender


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 13:07:00 UTC

  • THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > F

    | THE PRODUCTION OF HUMANS | Animal > Slave(dependent) > Serf(self supporting) > Freeman(rights to property) > Citizen(rights to commons) > Sovereign(king/judge)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 12:29:00 UTC

  • “The pen is mightier than the sword” is not a case for a benevolent pen, it is a

    —“The pen is mightier than the sword” is not a case for a benevolent pen, it is a demonstration of how to give order and efficiency to violence in one form or another.”— Hreodbeorht Røe

    (brilliant)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 12:25:00 UTC

  • “Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding

    —“Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding than predation or boycott?”— Oliver Wescott

    ||Unaware-no_oppy > Aware-oppy(Boycott, Cooperation, Predation)

    The profitability of any set of interactions is contingent upon the time value of boycott, cooperation, or predation, in some combination.

    In general, boycott preserves opportunity for future cooperation, cooperation increases the opportunity for future cooperation, and predation decreases the opportunity for future cooperation.

    In general, the value of predation increases with the advantage of some form of power, the chance of success, and the sustainability of a pool of available prey. The value of predation decreases with the chance of failure or retaliation, and the unsustainability of a pool of available prey.

    As an economic system, the domestication of the animal man (aryanism) which applied the domestication of animals to humans through the developmental sequence slave > serf > freeman > citizen > sovereign, was the most successful in history.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 12:20:00 UTC

  • Socialist Thieves, Libertarian Beggars, Sovereigntarian Warriors

    Socialist Thieves,

    Libertarian Beggars, Sovereigntarian Warriors.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 11:05:00 UTC

  • A libertarian begs for choice by permission. An aryan creates choice by violence

    A libertarian begs for choice by permission. An aryan creates choice by violence.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 11:04:00 UTC

  • WESTERN CIV: AGENCY/SOVEREIGNTY: Markets, Markets, Markets… all the way down

    WESTERN CIV: AGENCY/SOVEREIGNTY:

    Markets, Markets, Markets… all the way down.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 11:02:00 UTC

  • BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperatio

    |BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperation drive > personality > intuition > reason > calculation > computation > markets > symmetries.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 11:01:00 UTC