Source: Facebook

  • ORDER OF OPERATIONS. PATH TO ‘PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES’ —“Focusing on the core pri

    ORDER OF OPERATIONS. PATH TO ‘PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES’

    —“Focusing on the core principle of reciprocity is good, that’s a concept, that with a bit of time, most people can get their heads round. … We need to hear practical activities people can get involved in to push for this”— @relocateromania

    We will roll out ‘practical activities’ once we have 1) enough of the constitution out, 2) and enough of a FAQ, and 3) a video for each market segment we’re addressing so that they know the features and benefits.Then we can start ‘organizing’: Political Party. Activists. Fighters.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-09 07:21:00 UTC

  • “I saw this and I came to a conclusion: Philosophers are maladaptive. There’s a

    —“I saw this and I came to a conclusion: Philosophers are maladaptive. There’s a big difference between You and the philosophers (whether left or right wingers), and it lies in the way we both accommodate to the way nature really is.”— Ahmed Reda

    https://www.facebook.com/SkyelStewart/posts/10158090445874295Updated Feb 8, 2020, 10:21 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 22:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/85191840_569924456937782_50838424849

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/85191840_569924456937782_5083842484925104128_n_569924453604449.jpg WHY?WHY?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 20:18:00 UTC

  • ELIMINATING THE VERB TO BE (COPULA). IS IT REQUIRED? —“Is failure to use ePrim

    ELIMINATING THE VERB TO BE (COPULA). IS IT REQUIRED?

    —“Is failure to use ePrime in P an error? Why/not?”—Jonathan Besler

    Brandon Hayes: No; you can speak truthfully without speaking operationally.

    Curt Doolittle: Also. You can falsify another’s speech by translating it to operational prose. Again, like many things, once you learn the form you will identify when people are lying, and how they are lying, and gain the ability to explain how they are lying – including why they might be. And if someone questions the truth of your statements you can expand them to the fully operational form and demonstrate that you were merely exercising convenience. Just recall that lying in P means you failed due diligence – you don’t need to intend to. Its like transferring stolen property. You were involved and participated in the crime because you failed due diligence.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 18:54:00 UTC

  • Given the Human logical facility Given the Human grammatical facility Given the

    Given the Human logical facility

    Given the Human grammatical facility

    Given the Logics of free association(justification), the logics of language (internal consistency – inference), and operational logic (existential possibility – demonstrated);

    Given possibilities for decidability of nonsensical, undecidable, sufficient for action, truth candidate, tautology, falsehood.

    Are the logics falsificationary or justificationary in precedence?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 13:18:00 UTC

  • God, if there is a god, evidence of his hand, and his language, has been decoded

    God, if there is a god, evidence of his hand, and his language, has been decoded by scientists. He writes in the language of the physical laws of the natural universe, and the natural law of man, in a very small set of equations(sentences) that like all languages consists of nouns (states) verbs (changes), in a grammar of the subatomic, atomic, chemical, biochemical, biological, cognitive, behavioral economic, political, and military sciences. It’s only our failure to interpret all the sciences physical, biological, and cognitive as a language with only a few elements (sounds), combined into an increasingly rich vocabulary(words), according to rules (grammar) of sensibility (semantics) that remain consistent across all scales. And while mathematics at present gives us most of the language of the very small and the very large, as ridiculous as it seems, P gives us that language at human scale, in human time frames, for human purposes, of achieving godhood ourselves.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 13:15:00 UTC

  • “Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality only exists as entropy(de

    —“Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality only exists as entropy(devolution). What we want is an equilibrium where benefits of division of labor most outweigh the costs of diverging interests.”—Martin Štěpán

    (This is an example why I spent years at this task. To make new leadership for a new world. And look at these guys. Something happened. A new critical mass. It’s beautiful.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 09:47:00 UTC

  • “THE OVERTON WINDOW IS TAKING ABUSE” by Brandon Hayes Curt: The Overton window i

    “THE OVERTON WINDOW IS TAKING ABUSE”

    by Brandon Hayes

    Curt:

    The Overton window is taking abuse. We push on it from the inside so it expands. There are also people on both fringes pulling the edges of discourse from the outside. We’re breaking the window frame; and we ought to. Discourse is all acceptable; it’s certain action that isn’t. So, we’re crushing a concept.

    As the window opens more perspective frames break. I’ve been attempting to frame the conversation around the edges so previous frames of for sense-making that offered clarity become obsolete. (Say capitalism/socialism… the frame is false; we’re forcing the issue).

    Your timeline has always been money from what I could tell. The future has events that provide clarity/turning points. (2020 election for instance)

    At this point anything that alters the emotional underlay of the populace suites us because emotional breakdowns are perspective altering. The detractors, those that look to minimize emotional fluctuations only work to create emotional fragility and unstable frames (as they are emotionally based). [All chaos suites those that can reinstitute order. We’re the only ones offering anything fair]

    No one can survive sanely inside themselves searching for happiness. The recent JBP breakdown proves the solid open individualist frame [the one JBP purports as paramount] doesn’t hold up under pressure to change the whole world. It crumbles and falls apart because it’s more than anyone can do.

    See I believe it’s ok to need others. It’s necessary. I’ve been lucky to have those I can lean and depend on. I have been blessed with those I can trust. And now I have a system to vet everyone and can teach it to everyone else. (Thank you)

    We’re winning and people join winning teams. It’s a matter of getting them to put their money where their mouth is. And since money is abundant and it’s time that’s scarce; they have every reason. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 09:42:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY —“Lots of pro-boogaloo folks and others are looking for solutions. I

    TESTIMONY

    —“Lots of pro-boogaloo folks and others are looking for solutions. It starts with being pro-second Amendment. Then they identify the enemy.. Then they start looking for Solutions. Only Propertarianism actually offers solutions. For the price that is going to be paid for a chance to fix this wreck, it had better work.”—Rick Tavi


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 09:39:00 UTC

  • It’s because science has made anything other than deism impossible for rational

    It’s because science has made anything other than deism impossible for rational people, the bible and church dogma unbelievable, and the narratives that attempt to teach lessons irrelevant, absurd, or quaint – precisely because there is only one lesson. That’s before we get to the clergy being unworthy of respect, and the catholic clergy forever tainted by child abuse.

    People behave well because of the experience of safety in the burial, church, temple, military, marriage, feast sport,, festival experiences. This forms an addiction, just as safety in mother forms an addiction, just as friendship forms an addiction, just as sex forms an addiction – the reason we are open to addiction is because evolution’s way of keeping us invested in one another.

    We vary in the masculinity and femininity of brain structure which translates to a more empathic, social, and emotional or a more analytic, political, and action-oriented need. And the value of church (organized religion) dependent upon demand for inclusion. So thee church is evolving into satisfying only those people with the emotional and social needs that cannot be fulfilled by other means. Hence the uneducated, female, homosexual, dysfunctional, laboring class lower middle class shift in church demographics – and with it the economic collapse of church finances. So as usual, I go with the data. And the data isn’t pretty.

    Our religion like most, arose in concert with the agrarian age, and it has failed to transform for the industrial age. It satisfied demand for harmony in that age. And so given that people need a binding mythos and the rituals to reinforce it for social and political reasons, and at least half the population needs mindfulness for psychological reasons, how do we restore the utility of our old religion’s market for heroic figures under the same ethical and moral strategy, while preserving the christian moral and ethical strategy? The church hadn’t suppressed the saints, the path would be easier, since we could rotate archetypes as civilization changed, just as they did before monopoly (authoritarian) monotheistic abrahamic religions. So, we can’t do it and I think that is what is killing christianity as other than the religion of the world’s underclasses (Africa, South America).

    Religion teaches strategy for harmony and argument to persist it, but morality is something we know scientifically as reciprocity. But reciprocity tells us only to do no harm – to pay the cost of doing no harm.. Jesus teaches us to ignore our internal instincts and pay the cost of exhaustive forgiveness of ourselves and others. This tells us that we must pay the cost of harmony by bearing costs. And charity tells us that we must pay the cost of doing good.

    So while Aryanism, our ancient (market) religion, tells us to pay costs of excellence in all things and to be leaders in all things. Christianity, our medieval (monopoly) religion, tells us to pay costs of bringing people along with us. And our oldest religion of the hearth (nature, green man, elves, etc), tells us that nature is animal, childlike, and mischievous not evil, and we must be diligent against her mischief.

    These three religions were and remain in competition with another.

    Then the jews brought about marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism, to destroy us as they brought christianity to destroy our reason, stoicism, epicureanism, and excellences in the ancient world.

    How do I, or we, help our people from not having another semitic dark age – even if our people, like addicts, desire it?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 09:05:00 UTC