—“The only questions you ever have to ask a leftists are “how are you lying and what are you trying to steal? All the answers follow from there…”—Eli Harman
Conversely the only question you have to ask a rightist(conservative) is what are you trying to conserve from consumption?
Right, “Conservatives” conserve. Left “Progressives” Consume.
Why we don’t use conservatives and consumptionists is beyond me.
Oh wait. “Progressive” (rather than consumptionist) is one of those lies….
The left differs from the right just as men differ from women. The left does not require consistency, because they do not require reciprocity, because they are parasites seeking power not producers seeking markets. Left (Females) gossip, inflate and conflate to exaggerate the experiential for illustration, while Right (Males) use history and hyperbole to inflate the long term for illustration. Only the right seeks competitive survivability. The left and the female like flora and rabbits simply seek to cast their genes to the wind. We cannot change these cognitive biases. And if we look at history, it was the invention of patriarchy (masculinity) that dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty, and the feminine (abrahamic) that drags it back down.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23316751_10155870774042264_471572855348292358_n_10155870774042264.jpg THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION
(repost)(profoundly important graphic)
(organic common law as a means of incrementally suppressing free riding).
1) Humans acquire at cost and defend what they have acquired at cost.
2) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than predation.
3) cooperation is only preferable to predation in the total absence of parasitism. Or, what we call free-riding.
4) Because of the disproportionate value of cooperation, Humans retaliate against free riding even if at high cost ( altruistic punishment). They protect the institution by severe policing of cheaters.
5) rules against free riding, either normative or codified in law, prohibit parasitism (free riding).
6) prohibitions that are habituated in norms or codified in law provide a means of decision making in matters of conflict.
7) prohibitions against parasitism can be positively expressed as contractual “rights”.
8) community member (shareholders in the local market) insure one another by suppressing retaliation against settlements of grievances according to norms and laws.
9) The common, organic law allows for the least time lapse between an innovation in the means of parasitism and the construction of a prohibition against this new means of parasitism expressed as new law. As such all laws are discovered. (very important)
10) high trust societies use common law to incrementally suppress all available means of free riding, leaving productive participation in the market as the only viable means of survival.
11) as a consequence, the reproduction of the lower classes is suppressed and the distribution of talents increases along with the innovations in technology. (market eugenics). Thus obviating the need for tyranny and redistribution.
Aristocracy, Egalitarianism, morality, Nomocracy, meritocracy, Science, and eugenic evolution are mutually dependent.
The chart below shows the incremental suppression of parasitism stating from the suppression of violence through fraud, through conspiracy, through immigration, through conquest.
Only the west succeeded in developing truth.
And without it we cannot have the jury. And without the jury no judge or common law.
Truth matters above all else.
Pseudoscience is just babylonian monotheistic mysticism in new clothes.
This emperor is naked also.
Truth is enough to rescue the west.Oliver WestcottEgalitarianism? Do you mean before the law?Nov 10, 2017 9:37amCurt DoolittleAristocratic Egalitarianism refers to (a) the peerage, and (b) the aristocracy’s openness to increasing their numbers. In other words, western aristocracy functioned as a market.Nov 10, 2017 9:50amCurt DoolittleThis is largely to do with the inability of peoples above the 45th latitude, and roughly centered on the eurasian plain to concentrate agrarian production as had done the flood river civilizations.Nov 10, 2017 9:52amTHE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION
(repost)(profoundly important graphic)
(organic common law as a means of incrementally suppressing free riding).
1) Humans acquire at cost and defend what they have acquired at cost.
2) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than predation.
3) cooperation is only preferable to predation in the total absence of parasitism. Or, what we call free-riding.
4) Because of the disproportionate value of cooperation, Humans retaliate against free riding even if at high cost ( altruistic punishment). They protect the institution by severe policing of cheaters.
5) rules against free riding, either normative or codified in law, prohibit parasitism (free riding).
6) prohibitions that are habituated in norms or codified in law provide a means of decision making in matters of conflict.
7) prohibitions against parasitism can be positively expressed as contractual “rights”.
8) community member (shareholders in the local market) insure one another by suppressing retaliation against settlements of grievances according to norms and laws.
9) The common, organic law allows for the least time lapse between an innovation in the means of parasitism and the construction of a prohibition against this new means of parasitism expressed as new law. As such all laws are discovered. (very important)
10) high trust societies use common law to incrementally suppress all available means of free riding, leaving productive participation in the market as the only viable means of survival.
11) as a consequence, the reproduction of the lower classes is suppressed and the distribution of talents increases along with the innovations in technology. (market eugenics). Thus obviating the need for tyranny and redistribution.
Aristocracy, Egalitarianism, morality, Nomocracy, meritocracy, Science, and eugenic evolution are mutually dependent.
The chart below shows the incremental suppression of parasitism stating from the suppression of violence through fraud, through conspiracy, through immigration, through conquest.
Only the west succeeded in developing truth.
And without it we cannot have the jury. And without the jury no judge or common law.
Truth matters above all else.
Pseudoscience is just babylonian monotheistic mysticism in new clothes.
7 – Ethnic Nationalist (Universal. For all peoples. Nations are markets that can fail.)
ECONOMICS
I view economic schools as class philosophies using various forms of pseudoscience. The underclasses need serfdom, the lower classes need socialism(managed labor), the middle classes need markets, the R&D people need subsidy, and the aristocratic people need to create socialism, markets, and rule of law that make both possible.
These are just facts.
Austrian economics = Jewish economics (favoring the lender at everyone’s expense.).
Chicago economics = anglo rule of law economic (favoring the entrepreneur.) Possibly the best solution.
Keynesian Economics = Marxism v2, favoring the laborer and consumer at the expense of the society and civilization.
Everything else isn’t economics.
The only economics consists of rule of law, and supply of institutions that serve the necessities of the demographic.
2 – Tripartarian (Inequality. The natural hierarchy of the prisoner/slave/serf, laboring/commercial/financial, legal/military, and scientific/philosophical classes.)
3 – Reactionary (Anti-Abrahamist. Every one of the enlightenment programs has failed in social science and politics, and has succeeded only in replacing the Abrahamic superstition, with Abrahamic Psuedo-science, and Institutionalized lying by gossip.)
photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/23244313_10155868144722264_1296721606056831542_n_10155868144722264.jpg Walther PPK .380 (9mm Kurts) is the ‘date gun’ when one is out on the town in a suit.
—“The soviet model by the 1960s was a good one to live in.”—
Agreed. Mostly. But by consumer standards not so much. By then the economies were going the opposite directions. By the 1960’s (actually ln the 1950s) it was very clear that the soviet economic model was not going to be competitive, and that the marxist argument was simply wrong about capitalism and its replacement. Hence why it has been abandoned the world over.
Any country that has to imprison its people within its boundaries to stop them from fleeing is failing a test of government.
Now, the failure of the transition (russians were not ready for it) and the evils of the bureaucracies (russian/ukrainian/belorussian) were preventable for certain. A managed transition to a mixed economy that preserved authoritarian sectors and liberated consumer sectors was necessary and possible.
But if we talk to the people involved, (and we have lots of info on that these days) the problem was they just didn’t know what to do.
This taught the Chinese what to do. They’re doing it.
Now, russians are christian not confucian and despite the remains of mongolian political ethics, byzantine political ethics, and the (damned lack of ethics of the boyars, turks, and jews) this process is continuing.
But russians NEVER EVER had a middle class. Ukrainians had a middle class until soviet conquest. Although like in russia, it was too often jewish and hostile to the native population. So the problem is replacing authoritarian bureacracy and authoritarian ethics incentives and levels of accountability with commercial incentives, ethics, and levels of accountabiilty. Especially in the JUDICIAL class – which itself must be commercial ethic.
But not making the MISTAKE OF THE WEST and handing over the military, the political system, the industrial production, the agrarian production, and the infrastructure production to the middle class.
You see that’s the issue.
My understanding at this time is the same as it has been since 2013/2014. Putin misunderstood the ukrainian revolution as the simple want of the people to follow the polish model – a model which they are more capable of than the russians. So that they could get out of poverty. And that this was constructed by the conflict russian, ukrainian oligarch, and common people’s interests. And the common people won. Although it looks like they will have to let the russified generations die off before they can fix the country just like the germans have to let the russified people die off to fix east germany.
So the transition is possible and the chinese are showing how to do it (gradually) by training a consumer, middle, and bureaucratic class while maintaining authoritarian classes (top), and socialist classes (bottom).
My understanding is that the poor are better off under authoritarian schemes and everyone is better of if the ABLE classes are freed to pursue wealth in the service of CONSUMERS.
So the military aristocracy must maintain control. But never, ever, ever give the middle(western) or lower classes (soviet) classes control of military, political, resource, industrial, and territorial assets.
In other words, the ancient tripartism of white people was and remains the optimum method of political order. All monopoly orders are bad. We must have aristocratic, market, and serf economies because in fact we are genetically distributed as aristocracy, market, and serf classes.
photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/23434894_10155868060717264_1762579419939879409_n_10155868060717264.jpg At 10 yards and under, you don’t need (or possibly want) sights. Beyond that you want sights. Beyond 75 yards you want a longer barrel. Unfortunately this gun is dehorned byt not melted.
photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/23319484_10155868063802264_1542400605172018756_n_10155868063802264.jpg The first octagonal barrel HK pistol, from which all others were derived. Includes the spring around rather than below the barrel, providing lower barrel axis. HK P9 in single, P9S in double action, and yes they made on in select fire (full auto). I don’t like double action pistols unless I can carry them cocked and locked. But this is a small comfortable perfect pistol. In my opinion it was, and remains the upgrade to the Walther PPK. However, later models have a ridiculous trigger guard and long pull double action trigger.
Have you noticed I don’t like modern hollywood guns? lol
photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/23331190_10155867994662264_2808070622604449458_o_10155867994662264.jpg STI ‘Monolith. Note the longer and nicely heavier frame that matches the length of the slide.
