Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • by Kage Keller —“I believe it is critical to have appropriate masculine role m

    by Kage Keller

    —“I believe it is critical to have appropriate masculine role models.

    Men mature more slowly into the role of accountability (likely a side effect of the massive dose of pubescent testosterone).

    Women are at a serious advantage in game theory and emotional awareness until well into the late twenties early thirties..

    This difference was modulated in the past by the groups of elder men that demonstrated and instilled legacy as a higher calling… modulating gynocentric behavior.

    At some point in a boys early teens, they are passed from the mothers to groups of men to begin the passage into manhood.

    But this rarely happens now. So boys are not ritually initiated into a higher calling, and society is left with perpetual man-boys.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 00:49:00 UTC

  • TRANSCENDING THE LIBERAL ORDER (bit of brilliance here that few will ever reach)

    TRANSCENDING THE LIBERAL ORDER

    (bit of brilliance here that few will ever reach)

    by Joel Davis

    It’s funny how once I fully realised that you have completed the Enlightenment and taken Liberalism to its’ logical end, I simultaneously realised that you have stripped Liberalism of all its’ (faux-)sacredness around which we have all been culturally conditioned.

    You would undoubtedly take that as a compliment, yet ironically, that is precisely what alienated me from your ideology.

    Once I was fully deprogrammed and transcended the Liberal axia upon which our culture is built, I stopped measuring in the units of individualism and instead became focused on socio-cultural systems as entities themselves.

    We all experience identification with socio-cultural systems which transcend our individuality, and as individuals are culturally disciplined, they progressively lose their individuality into shared identity.

    You could explain this merely with evolutionary psychology if you want, but we can also map out the structure of how this functions on the experiential level, and as that is the level at we directly experience this phenomena, it seems far more interesting to me.

    So yes, we can measure it at the marginalist-Darwinian level, but we can also measure it at the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level.

    Just because the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level is harder to falsify, it doesn’t make it any less real, it just makes it a more challenging domain.

    (Curt: You see, I don’t have to produce the next generation of thought, I just have to END THE PRISON of this generation of thought. If I could help bring about 1000 people like Joel, can you imagine what would come of it?????)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 00:45:00 UTC

  • MOTIVES I am not trying to find fulfillment. But to create law that stops the ‘f

    MOTIVES

    I am not trying to find fulfillment.

    But to create law that stops the ‘falsehoods’ that create the dark ages.

    I’ve been open about it entirely.

    I’m creating a negativa. A science. Not a philosophy or ideology.

    Aesthetics (fulfilllment, joy, experience) is up to others.

    We all search for the mindfulness we need.

    I want to stop evil.

    Such that only possibility of good remains.

    How good is constructed is not important to me.

    Let a thousand nations bloom.

    That is how I will find mindfulness.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 00:43:00 UTC

  • CONSENSUS PRODUCES MONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLIES FAIL TO SERVE MARKET DEMANDS (impor

    CONSENSUS PRODUCES MONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLIES FAIL TO SERVE MARKET DEMANDS

    (important)

    We all need mindfulness in a method available to us.

    We all need a strategy using methods and resources available to us.

    We all need myths(narratives), ideologies (propaganda), philosophies(methods of reasoning), and sciences(methods of measurements) with which to decide how to act to pursue that strategy.

    The reason being we marginally indifferent enough to communicate within limits and cooperate within limits.

    But we are marginally different in our genetic, social, economic, physical, intellectual, and emotional abilities.

    Different enough to require different mindfulness, strategies, and means of surviving, prospering, and enjoying.

    So we are left with the problem of cooperating on means, despite different ends, and despite different genetic, social, economic, physical intellectual, and emotional abilities.

    And the only way to do so is markets of voluntary reciprocity at every scale from association to production to reproduction to commons to polities to nations.

    And the only way to facilitate that is multiple economies slave(prisoner), serf(laborer), freeman(craftsman), citizen(managerial), sovereign(executive).

    Because the slave needs direction, the serf security, the craftsman opportunity, the citizen liberty, and the sovereign institutions.

    And our folly has been the post enlightenment effort to produce a monopoly economy instead of a monopoly rule of law and a market for economies given the various needs and abilities.

    We instinctually pursue consensus and numbers beyond the scale of their utility the same way we extend our perception of ethics, economics, and physics beyond the scale of human perception, and to the point of their failure.

    The maximum value of consensus is the law of reciprocity.

    Beyond that the maximum value of any given consensus is that which can be achieved by reciprocity.

    This is the lesson of the past two centuries.

    Tripartism was a western practice because like all else in western civilization it was an empirical observation of existential reality – not a comforting lie.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 00:03:00 UTC

  • ( on marrying before you fully mature ) —“There are exceptions for the religio

    ( on marrying before you fully mature )

    —“There are exceptions for the religiously devoted and occasional high school sweethearts (I have witnessed both.) If you peak late, it’s a bit of a paradox, because you won’t have the maturity to understand you should wait.”— Kage Keller

    —“Prefrontal cortex finishes development in males around 25-27.”— Ian Amsler

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 23:41:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24879952_10155938128002264_49028623

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24879952_10155938128002264_49028623

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24879952_10155938128002264_490286236444785928_o_10155938128002264.jpg (humor)

    —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignty, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.”— Alastair BuckwheatJoel Davishttps://youtu.be/bG5wSvi7euIDec 05, 2017 11:40pmMatt RickhussA system in which the morally healthy are praised and the morally unhealthy are condemned.Dec 05, 2017 11:41pmNick HeywoodNo! I don’t have to and ya can’t make me! =DDec 05, 2017 11:59pmNick HeywoodWould ya look at Doolittle? FFS! LOL =D =D =D

    F’n love him but he’s mad!Dec 05, 2017 11:59pmShawn KinneyThe Abrahamic model.Dec 06, 2017 12:01amJon JonathanI’m not saying none of the Holocaust ever happened, all I’m saying is there is no credible evidence that it was wrong.Dec 06, 2017 12:17amNick HeywoodGotta be careful bringin’ up “The Holocaust” 😉

    Some’o’the maths doesn’t stack up. Just sayin’Dec 06, 2017 12:20amRichard Jacobson”Exterminate all the Whigs!”Dec 06, 2017 12:26amAlastair BuckwheatIncremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignity, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.Dec 06, 2017 1:01amCurt Doolittleomfg you are good…. damn.Dec 06, 2017 1:19amRob McMullanAwesomeDec 06, 2017 7:33amBjorn Moritzhttps://youtu.be/DhslEgn_8SMDec 06, 2017 8:07amCurt Doolittleawesome.Dec 06, 2017 9:27amBjorn MoritzDid you ever watch the series, Spartacus: Blood and Sand? It was brilliant!Dec 06, 2017 9:29amCurt Doolittle@[687166933:2048:Bjorn Moritz] yes, loved it. rome, spartacus, vikings, tudors…. love it all.Dec 06, 2017 10:23amCurt DoolittleThere is a reason you can’t make a drama about the spartans.

    THEY DIDN”T HAVE ANY.Dec 06, 2017 10:23amWilliam L. BengeSomebody’s been paying attention, I’d venture to say. paha

    Man what a beauty of a statement. Just wowDec 06, 2017 11:38amWilliam L. Benge(mesmerized)Dec 06, 2017 11:39amCurt Doolittledamn he’s good, realllyDec 06, 2017 11:47amPeter TruscinskiNapDec 06, 2017 12:28pmCurt Doolittlenope to nap. non imposition against born costs of any kind, leaving only voluntary reciprocity (productive agrarianism), is very different from non aggression against intersubjectively verifiable property (parasitic pastoralism).Dec 06, 2017 12:31pmPeter Truscinski@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] Nap as in 😴Dec 06, 2017 12:59pmPeter TruscinskiNot NAPDec 06, 2017 12:59pmPeter TruscinskiMonarchy tho 🤔👌Dec 06, 2017 1:00pmPeter TruscinskiRepublicanism 🎉Dec 06, 2017 1:00pmBjorn MoritzI think I’d enjoy it anyway. Just them slave driving some Helots, massacring opposing armies and burning down some sacred groves 😍Dec 06, 2017 1:01pmCurt Doolittlesorry peter. just stayin’ on message. lolDec 06, 2017 1:02pmPeter TruscinskiLmaoDec 06, 2017 1:03pmPeter TruscinskiIt’s all goodDec 06, 2017 1:03pmPeter TruscinskiI understand your posits thoughDec 06, 2017 1:03pmAlastair Buckwheat^ Haha now I’m embarrassed, I’m only reiterating your hard work. Finish that book so we can really start to proselytise ;)Dec 07, 2017 10:24amMichael AndradeWe must secure the existence of our tendies and a future for NEET children.Dec 08, 2017 11:14am(humor)

    —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignty, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.”— Alastair Buckwheat

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 23:38:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24799414_10155937985667264_57641607

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24799414_10155937985667264_57641607

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24799414_10155937985667264_5764160701697517032_o_10155937985667264.jpg Kris RueThis is what success looks like.Dec 05, 2017 11:52pm

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 21:55:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://taxplancalculator.com/

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 21:54:00 UTC

  • WHAT’S THE DEFINITION OF AGENCY AS YOU USE IT? —“What is the definition of “ag

    WHAT’S THE DEFINITION OF AGENCY AS YOU USE IT?

    —“What is the definition of “agency” as the term is used here?”— Daniel Roland

    As an example, God would have perfect agency, because would have perfect knowledge(omniscience), perfect reason, perfect emotions, perfect mindfulness, perfect ability to act (omnipotence), unlimited resources, and no competition, no need to cooperate, and therefore no need for conventions, laws, institutions, or infrastructure.

    As humans we have imperfect knowledge, imperfect reason, imperfect mindfulness, imperfect emotions, limited range of actions, limited resources, and we live in a world where we must compete, must cooperate to compete, and to do so require conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure.

    So, Agency consists of the degree to which one approaches perfect ability to act, when not limited by knowledge, reason, emotions, mindfulness, range of action, available instrumentation, available resources, competition, cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions and infrastructure.

    Given we can never have unlimited knowledge, unlimited resources, and we have limited ability to be free of competition, need for cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure, we can seek largely to improve our knowledge, reason, mindfulness, and assets so that we maximize our agency within the availble limits.

    Now, I am not entirely certain that there is much difference between emotions(impulses) and mindfulness(discipline). And so perhaps I should combine the two rather than separate them.

    And in general when I am speaking of the difference of genders, men have greater agency than women, because frankly “we have less going on” upstairs, in more concentrated form; we are not constantly interrupted by impulses and emotions and worries; and we are in general simply faster and stronger. Nature evolved women for the construction of offspring and us for the persistence of the tribe in which we concentrate our genes. We fight, and by consequence we hunt. They gather and often hunt (really) but largely spend their time on the internal world of the community (tribe) while we spend our time on that intersection between the tribe and competitive reality.

    Bill, Eli, and I have worked on Agency quite a bit, and Bill has convinced me that Agency should be thought of as an asset we seek to accumulate. He also uses the term “Autonomy” to describe what I understand to be the end result of agency. (I think that is what he means). But I tend to just stick with Agency since I don’t see the difference, and prefer to speak via-negativa.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 21:49:00 UTC

  • I think that all of us search for mindfulness by the means available to us and t

    I think that all of us search for mindfulness by the means available to us and that for some of us that is from analytic to spiritual, and some from spiritual to analytic.

    As far as I know mindfulness must facilitate control over our lives, and therefore those of us with control and satisfaction are more incentivized seek analytic mindfulness alone, and those of us that have less control and are less satisfied seek increasingly spiritual forms. That appears to be the causal relationship.

    Many people have taken what they needed and moved on. And that is what I expect of people.

    Propertarianism is just like any other science. Some of us want to investigate more deeply for its own sake, some of us want to affect change to the world, and some of us want to affect internal change – and as such propertarianism is just a technology to help it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 21:09:00 UTC