Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • ANSWER HARD QUESTIONS – LARGELY IN ORDER TO PREVENT LYING BY STATEMENT, SUGGESTI

    https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-youre-racist/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=e01c8071&srid=u4QvI ANSWER HARD QUESTIONS – LARGELY IN ORDER TO PREVENT LYING BY STATEMENT, SUGGESTION OR IMPLICATION.

    —“Do you think you’re racist?”—

    **Racism**, as I understand it, refers to four behaviors:

    1) the process of treating an individual by the properties of his class (race) rather than waiting to ascertain the properties that he himself demonstrates. In other words, stereotyping. Unfortunately stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences. So this is difficult to counteract outside of commercial interactions.

    2) the process of criticizing a class (race) for the costs that they impose on your class (race) rather than taking actions that prevent a class (race) from imposing costs upon your class (race).

    3) the process of denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    4) the process of conducting genocidal, political, economic, and kinship warfare by denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    **Racism is not any of these four behaviors:**

    1) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    2) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people (like all creatures) favor their class (kin, tribe, race) group for the simple reason that except as outliers, it is in their status, social, reproductive, economic, and political interests to do so.

    3) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people vote in democracies heavily by race, gender, and class, thereby competing by EQUAL political vote rather than by unequal economic, intellectual, or military means.

    4) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people conduct informational and political warfare instead of economic and violent warfare, by the denial of differences in abilities, biases, preferences, behaviors, intentions, and goals.

    **That’s simply empirical science. **

    **And arguing against it is simply lying.**

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.Updated Dec 28, 2017, 10:45 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 22:45:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTOOD 1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all q

    https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD

    1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus.

    2. As a means of questioning, a conservatives requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    3. Conservatism requires ‘empirical’ results, and where empirical fails ‘traditional’ since traditional survived empirical tests of reality.

    4. Accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital, attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    5. Conservatism is a eugenic reproductive strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.

    6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because it is antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    **Soveriengty requires reciprocity

    Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION

    Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    CONSERVATIVES

    Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.)

    Conservatives are actively suppressed in academy and media.

    This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)

    **AUTHORS TO READ

    **Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen.

    (The essayists are nonsense)

    Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions.

    **READING LIST

    **Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/).

    My reading list (above) contains most of the science we’ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists.

    CheersUpdated Dec 28, 2017, 10:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 22:21:00 UTC

  • Dec 28, 2017, 9:42 PM

    https://www.quora.com/How-is-Roman-slavery-different-from-American-slavery/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=74114499&srid=u4QvUpdated Dec 28, 2017, 9:42 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 21:42:00 UTC

  • COMPLETE ANSWER —“What are your thoughts on Politics and Religion”— I have c

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-your-thoughts-on-politics-and-religion/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=424fe06b&srid=u4QvTHE COMPLETE ANSWER

    —“What are your thoughts on Politics and Religion”—

    I have come to understand that the abrahamic religions are the cause of the dark age, the cause of more deaths than the plagues, and the continuing cause of human suffering, and the greatest threat to human transcendence (evolution).

    We all require **mindfulness** outside of hunter gatherer lifestyles where we know our ‘place’ with everyone around us. We need Personal mindfulness. Interpersonal Mindfulness. And socio-political mindfulness. We evolved as pack animals. A strange mixture of chimp and wolf. We all long for the security of some aspect of the elation, power, comfort, and security of pack.

    Yet the more advanced our civilizations the more isolated we are as individuals. This was the problem religions solved, and religions solved them by evolving all at about the same time, in response to the needs of living in greater numbers with less certainty in our relations.

    We fail to grasp that religions are vast lies that provide mindfulness. We can achieve mindfulness through intentional discipline, a variety of rituals, participations in feasts, dances, parades, sports, celebrations, and especially in oration, ‘theater’, and Myth.

    But we can obtain that mindfulness by truthful, half truthful, or entirely untruthful means. And there are profound consequences for any people given the means of mindfulness they choose.

    As far as I can tell, government is necessary for the production of increasingly complex commons. And mindfulness is necessary for cooperation in those increasingly complex commons.

    But that said, both politics under democracy and religion regardless of political structure are constituted of very little other than utter falsehoods, because both seek power over us and profits from us, by lying.

    If we lived under rule of natural (common) law (of tort), where we extended warranty of due diligence from goods, and services, to political speech, and houses of government were but a market for cooperation between the classes (as in the old english monarchic model) except that we used direct democracy or direct economic democracy, without representatives, and each voted on each issue individually, it is very hard to imagine we would have much use for politics.

    If we were all taught mindfulness like we are taught table manners, reading-writing, arithmetic – even if we had to teach it by half a dozen different means in order to satisfy the needs of peoples with different brain structures, then we would have little need for religion.

    The problem is…. we all love our little lies.

    And in my world, it is the lies that cause all the world’s problems, and justify all the world’s crimes, and encourage all the world’s evil.Updated Dec 28, 2017, 9:13 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 21:13:00 UTC

  • COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER. —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citize

    https://www.quora.com/Do-governments-create-wealth-and-jobs-for-its-citizens/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1dbcc7c2&srid=u4Qv*THE COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-*

    First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about.

    SERIES: *Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.*

    TERMS

    **- Defense** (*producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)*),

    **- Rule** (*dispute resolution, or resolution of differences*),

    **- Government** (*the production and management of commons*), and;

    **- Bureaucracy** (*a monopoly that manages daily operations*) are four different things.

    DEFINITIONS:

    **Defense** secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of **SOCIAL ORDER** (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions)

    **Rule** resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce **LAW**.

    **Government** produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces **LAW SUBSTITUTES** we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse.

    **Bureaucracy** does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive.

    **WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO**

    Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks.

    Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers.

    So governments create the possibility of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of production.

    Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time.

    Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian InstituteUpdated Dec 28, 2017, 8:38 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 20:38:00 UTC

  • TRUTHS IN A COMPLETE ANSWER —-“Should whites pay reparations for colonialism?’

    https://www.quora.com/Should-white-people-pay-reparations-for-their-collective-colonial-pasts/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=23a1c6a7&srid=u4QvUNPLEASANT TRUTHS IN A COMPLETE ANSWER

    —-“Should whites pay reparations for colonialism?’—

    I wonder, if white people ( Native Europeans) should collect taxes (Income) for their spread of Aristotelianism (Science), Natural Law under Reciprocity by Tort (Rule of Law), Accounting, Finance, Banking, Credit, and Interest, and The suppression of systemic corruption and in doing so dragging the whole of humanity kicking and screaming, in one revolt after another out of ignorance, superstition, hard physical labor, child labor, poverty, diseases, infanticide, and tyranny in less than 500 years. When beginning with the Abrahamic Dark Age (Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the world had made little caloric progress for almost two thousand years.)

    As far as I know, the only mistake white people have made is entering into a civil war with cousins in Germany, that was initiated by communists, starting in Russia, and spreading like islam today (westward) to the point of internal exhaustion, and therefore leaving the colonial problem incomplete, and therefore leaving so much of the world to struggle through the long process of corruption-suppression, rule of law development, and middle class development, while the only western peoples left standing (Americans, Australians, and Canadians) were geographically isolated from the less developed peoples – all of whom still struggle with corruption, truthfulness, rule of law, moral commerce, and dysgenic reproduction rates.

    WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE THE GREEKS AND ROMANS?

    WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE NATIVE NORTHERN EUROPEANS (WHITES)?Updated Dec 28, 2017, 7:53 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 19:53:00 UTC

  • the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Warren-Buffett-considered-republican-or-democrat-Why/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=e1e41bdf&srid=u4QvFrom the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward the republican party over Lincoln’s civil war. This led to the Democratic and Republican parties having both conservative and classical liberal members.

    Beginning between 76 and 80 this began to change because the democratic party had been captured more aggressively by the radical left and the feminists. Plus the left had used immigration starting in 1964 as a means of achieving the socialist revolution (tearing down the american experiment) through demographic warfare where they had failed by propaganda and pseudoscience (marxism, boazianism, freudianism, cantorian mathematics, and keynesian post marxist economics.)

    By and large the democratic effort has been effective for large business and finance. So many large business owners that serve the unproductive, laboring, working, and lower middle classes (what he invests in), are better off with policy that increases consumption.

    Whereas the republican (Aristocratic) is far more concerned with accumulating capital in Human (eugenic), behavioral (normative), institutional (rule of law by tort reciprocity – not rule BY legislation), and territorial than current consumption which consumes human capital (dysgenic, dysnormative, discretionary rather than reciprocal.)

    So between his AGE, his REGION, and his INTERESTS he votes for conservative democratic policies.Updated Dec 28, 2017, 7:38 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 19:38:00 UTC

  • Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres

    Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:51:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally ex

    by Eli Harman

    1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty.

    2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally exceptional families.

    3 – ARISTOCRACY: the martial elite.

    4 – CITIZENS: productive, self-supporting, stakeholders who perform militial service.

    5 – COMMONERS: productive, self-supporting, individuals subsidiary to the above.

    6 – PEASANTS: dependent underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:37:00 UTC

  • RUNS IN THE FAMILY…. On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Repor

    https://everipedia.org/wiki/Doolittle_Report%2C_1954/IT RUNS IN THE FAMILY….

    On intelligence agencies…..

    Summary

    The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA.

    (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.)

    Personnel

    The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”.

    ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. )

    (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )Updated Dec 28, 2017, 6:32 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:32:00 UTC