Source: Facebook

  • JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM ARE CIVILIZATION DESTROYERS Todd E. Magnusson Re

    JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM ARE CIVILIZATION DESTROYERS

    Todd E. Magnusson

    Read one of his short little primer books on Sharia Law. It is probably the least understood and most important as its a political system and not just religious. Generally speaking, Islam is a civilization destroyer. Christianity is in its own right is a civilization destroyer as well, but by means of excessive mercy in the face of destruction.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 13:20:00 UTC

  • COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM,

    COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM, SOCIALISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM

    by Simon Ström

    There are many common features – both started out as Jewish minority movements centered around one or a few rogue rabbis, trapped inside aristocratic, European hegemonic states (Roman Empire/Russia, Germany etc), preaching egalitarian universalism for some unspecified reason (…you might speculate about pre-cognitive group interests at play…), moving on to rally women, slaves and the proles against established but perplexed and ill-equipped aristocratic regimes and narratives, resulting in the formation of highly centralized priesthood or party bureaucracies ripe with contempt for the preceding order, and a totalitarian propensity to set unchallengeable dogma about all things little and big.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 13:18:00 UTC

  • 1400 YEAR WAR AGAINST ABRAHAMISM AND IN PARTICULAR, ISLAM. Judaism Christianity

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y&feature=youtu.beOUR 1400 YEAR WAR AGAINST ABRAHAMISM AND IN PARTICULAR, ISLAM.

    Judaism Christianity and islam are nothing more than an ancient revolt by the pastoralist underclass against civilization, just as the French, German, Jewish, counter enlightenments were an underclass revolt against civilization. Just as Jewish Marxism, French Socialism, and current german europeanism are revolts against civilization.

    Aristocracy made civilization.

    Deal with it.Updated Jan 19, 2018, 12:21 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 12:21:00 UTC

  • IT’S NOT THE RIGHT THAT DENIES THE FACTS —“Q: Why do so many right wingers cla

    IT’S NOT THE RIGHT THAT DENIES THE FACTS

    —“Q: Why do so many right wingers claim to care about facts while simultaneously believing and sharing blatant misinformation?”—

    Since the opposite is generally true, that liberals are almost always wrong, because Marxism, Socialism, Freudianism, Boazian Anthropology, all of sociology and psychology, and of course postmodern political correctness are all products of pseudoscience, and conservatism is reducible to the single principle of empirical, sovereign, voluntary reciprocity, it’s pretty hard to guess what it is you’re fantasizing.

    Conservatives DO use hyperbole (exaggeration) to illustrate ‘what would happen if everyone did this’. But then, that is the whole point of the categorical imperative: only do something if you wish everyone else did it also.

    Liberalism is nonsense, pseudosicence, and outright lying.

    Conservatism is just rule of law by reciprocity (tort).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 12:17:00 UTC

  • There are only three means of coercion: gossip, trade, and violence

    There are only three means of coercion: gossip, trade, and violence.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 12:15:00 UTC

  • Liberals consists of the upper class that cannot complete in physical or commerc

    Liberals consists of the upper class that cannot complete in physical or commercial markets, so they sell falsehoods, gossip and entertainment to women and the underclasses who happily cause everyone else to pay for their childishness. Thusly creating an alliance between the dishonest unproductive and the inadequately productive, at the expense of the honestly productive.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 12:14:00 UTC

  • WHAT ARE YOU? —“Are you Christian?”— I am a Sovereign, an Aryan, a Pagan, an

    WHAT ARE YOU?

    —“Are you Christian?”—

    I am a Sovereign, an Aryan, a Pagan, an Aristotelian, a Stoic, and a Christian.

    As a Sovereign: I limitlessly insure with my mind, body, kin, and property, the mind, body, kin, and property, of those who exchange the same with me.

    As an Aryan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of man into the gods we imagine – whether that be by cooperative voluntary production or uncooperative, and if necessary, violent prosecution.

    As a Pagan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of nature into the paradise we imagine.

    As an Aristotelian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of knowledge into the infinite dominion over emotion, mind, body, man, nature, and the universe.

    As a Stoic: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of the self such that we can make use of knowledge, nature, and mankind in transcendence of each: the continuous production of agency over self, others, and nature.

    As a Christian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of others lacking the agency of the Sovereign, Aryan, Pagan, Aristotelian, and Stoic.

    This is an aesthetic, a religion, philosophy, a law, and a science, of action.

    “My Name Is Aryan, And We Are Many”

    That what I am.

    ===

    And there is no portfolio by by which one can act in concert with the universe than that. If there was I would have found it and chosen it instead.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 12:03:00 UTC

  • THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE INTERGENERATIONAL KIN GROUP CORPORATION (Nobility) Tolera

    THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE INTERGENERATIONAL KIN GROUP CORPORATION (Nobility)

    Tolerance of Disapproval, Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, and Rallying by the … ah, shall we say, marginal classes – themselves unable to create competitive intergenerational kin groups – is as obligatory as is Noblesse Oblige.

    We must not deny the petty people their illusions. 😉

    lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 11:50:00 UTC

  • CHANGE THE WORLD? LAW: BY ELIMINATING THE BAD NOT MAKING THE GOOD. THE GOOD IS A

    CHANGE THE WORLD? LAW: BY ELIMINATING THE BAD NOT MAKING THE GOOD. THE GOOD IS A CHOICE, THE BAD IS DECIDABLE.

    I do not wish to change the world, only continue to suppress ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, propaganda, the fictionalisms, and deceit so that any good may come into being that anyone wishes, as long as it is not done by the imposition of costs upon the investments made by others. Continue to suppress parasitism.

    Unfortunately there are people, groups, classes, cultures that exist by parasitism, and so they must bear the heavy burden of change against their will, just as have the many generations before all of us have born the cost of change by replacing the easy parasitism upon the world, one another, and mankind, with the difficult productivity that enhances all three.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 09:26:00 UTC

  • FULL FASH? WELL SORT OF, YES. Well I’m full fascist yes: in as usual, a more pre

    FULL FASH? WELL SORT OF, YES.

    Well I’m full fascist yes: in as usual, a more precise sense: Market fascist. Rule by Natural Law, Market Fascist. Nationalist, Rule by Natural Law, Market, Fascist.

    I just get less and less libertarian as the necessity for and opportunity for civil war to bring about nationalist, rule of law, market fascism draws near.

    Tolerance is a luxury only within the limits of nationalism, rule by national law of reciprocity, and the achievement of desires by means of meritocratic market.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 09:19:00 UTC