Source: Facebook

  • I was educated to write about art, literature, and philosophy every day. But I l

    I was educated to write about art, literature, and philosophy every day. But I like women, money, business, technology, competition too much to be a poor starving artist.

    I won the Anna Ball Pierce Scholarship twice I think. Which was the faculty’s award to the person most likely to become a successful working artist.

    But both physics and art present one with significant challenges: one must beg lifelong for capital.

    Entrepreneurs make capital.

    Warriors make kingdoms

    And a kingdom is the highest Art.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-12 08:33:00 UTC

  • Man as Fictionalist, Jesus as Philosopher, Aristotle as Scientist Man creates th

    Man as Fictionalist, Jesus as Philosopher, Aristotle as Scientist

    Man creates the narrative god in order to produce an authority figure who is an arbitrator between different preferences and customs. We invented custom before religion, and religion before law, and law before science. This narrative takes advantage of a quirk in human psychology that seeks to avoid blame. So neither party in an exchange dominates the other and no party seeks to retaliate against the other, because both are adhering to the demands of an ‘alpha’ ruler.

    Again, God Narratives take advantage of a quirk in our social instincts.

    The problem is, we have passed through mystical, supernatural, theological, rational, legal, and now scientific phases.

    And there is no reason to fail to pay the cost of teaching us to circumvent that quirk than there is to fail the cost of teaching reading, math, and reason.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-12 08:29:00 UTC

  • WHITE SKIN IS NOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGE. (Asian Is) (from an article on sal

    WHITE SKIN IS NOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGE. (Asian Is)

    (from an article on salon)

    It’s not an evolutionary advantage. It’s a REPRODUCTIVE ADVANTAGE. Symmetry, Neoteny, and Aquiline features are a reproductive advantage. Whites and east asians have (a) higher distributions of neotonic evolution (and hence personality traits, and hence IQ which is the dominant personality trait). Lower rates and depth of sexual maturity (neoteny) produce social behaviors that are an evolutionary advantage in the development of technologies by which to defeat others.

    We all can ascend. our best in every tribe, nation and race can transcend.

    It is our underclasses that burden us and others.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-12 08:16:00 UTC

  • EVERY KIN GROUP’S CONSERVATIVES(MALES) ADVOCATE SUPREMACISM (from an article on

    EVERY KIN GROUP’S CONSERVATIVES(MALES) ADVOCATE SUPREMACISM

    (from an article on Salon)

    (a) White Supremacism – like Jewish supremacism, Russian Supremacism, Muslim Supremacism, Hindu Supremacism, Chinese Supremacism, and Japanese supremacism, is a demonstration of kin selection. However white supremacism is advocated by our intellectual, scientific, technological, normative, social, and political rates achievement in both the ancient and modern worlds, and our lack of similar rapid advancement in the Abrahamic Dark Age.

    (b) We have known that man has continuously whitened in the northern climates for years – just as he has continuously darkened in african climes.

    (c) We have known for years the process of ‘whitening’ began 20k years ago – and has been reversing since white people internlinked the world through rapid transportation during the age of sail.

    (d) We have known for the past few years that the Yamna expansion did not integrate but replaced prior generations of proto europeans with modern european-indo-iranians.

    (e) we are discovering through genetic analysis that our superiority is biological: we have succeeded at greater pedomorphic evolution by variation in endocrine expression during in utero, ex utero, and later development, and the lifelong expressions of that pedomorphism – which is why we have lower testosterone, are more tolerant, less clannish, and are the highest trust people on earth, and the only people to develop a high trust, territorial, capital intensive, commons-intensive, civilization. Period.

    And all kin groups, whether tribe, nation, or race, seek their superiority as an expression of evolutionary necessity –

    without which groups would not identify opportunities to exploit and evolve to seize them.

    The Marxist-postmodern pseudo-scientific century is over. Man is no different from any other animal in that breeds express genetic traits. And all we see between abrahamic and western arguments, is the scientific western male evolutionary, and the rhetorical female devolutionary expressions of those genes.

    What has happened is that while it has taken seventy years of hard work, despite active suppression of academic research SCIENCE has proven us right, and we are armed with that science. And that is the reason we are winning.

    Because western man originated science, and remains scientific if for no other reason than his origins are technological: expansion through the combination of horse, wheel, bronze, language, and truthful (empirical) testimony.

    No More Dark Ages. The First Abrahamic equalitarian counter-enlightenment caused a thousand year dark age and so far 500M lives.

    The Second Abrahamic Egalitarian Counter-Enlightenment begins with Rousseau, to Kant and the Continental School, to Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, and the Frankfurt School, and back to the french for the Postmodern and Feminist School – with nothing but Counter-evidence, Counter-history, Counter-Truth, Counter-Reason, and outright propagandism and lying.

    We will succeed at defeating the Second Abrahamic Dark Age, in its marxist-communist pseudoscientific, postmodern-equalitarian pseudo-rational, and Islamic theological (magical) school.

    We will do so by demonstrating our SUPERIORITY in Truth, Reason, Science, Technology, Law, Institutions, Norms, and traditions. Because in the end our tradition is truth and correspondence with reality – and that, and our genes, are our competitive advantage. An advantage unequalled among the tribes, nations, and races.

    Curt Doolittle,

    The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-12 08:16:00 UTC

  • (nerd stuff) OMG I can’t believe how much better working with Vue is than React.

    (nerd stuff)

    OMG I can’t believe how much better working with Vue is than React. Yeah, I have the usual (!#*F) problems with webpack arbitrarily puking without error messages and spending half a day playing sherlock, or randomizing file paths, but by and large, everything I hated about working with React is so much cleaner in Vue. Joy joy. The tech is almost there. Although someone still has to do something about webpack. What a hung of bloated junk. It’s like “Magic Happens”. The whole NPM/Webpack universe is a little too close to the early microsoft days: ‘well, reinstall and it should work’. Argh.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-11 20:09:00 UTC

  • Feb 11, 2018, 2:30 PM

    https://www.tremr.com/Duck-Rabbit/sexually-permissive-societies-always-fall-anthropologist-saysUpdated Feb 11, 2018, 2:30 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-11 14:30:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/27797886_189424084987823_83370409626

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/27797886_189424084987823_83370409626

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/27797886_189424084987823_8337040962680230009_o_189424084987823.jpg


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-11 12:29:00 UTC

  • MIND IS A VERB I think we distinguish between noun and verb for a reason, and I

    MIND IS A VERB

    I think we distinguish between noun and verb for a reason, and I think we are mistaken that mind is a noun, when it is a verb. We say thinking and mind, but a brain exists, and when it is thinking, we should say ‘minding’ lol.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-10 15:56:00 UTC

  • DEFINE “YOU” If I put your ashes in an urn, is that you? If I put your dead body

    DEFINE “YOU”

    If I put your ashes in an urn, is that you?

    If I put your dead body in a casket is that you?

    If I read your written words, isthat you?

    whenever you use the word ‘is’ you are engaged in a self or other deception, because it means “i don’t know how this exists”. When you use the word ‘you’ as referencing the physical body, or ‘you’ as the potential interaction of mind and body, or ‘you’ as the acting interaction between mind and body…. which are you asking?

    Because ‘is’ and ‘you’ questions aren’t philosophical questions, their grammatical errors positioned as a pretense of philosophical sophisms.

    I consist of the consequences of the continuous operation of my body, and in particular my brain.

    the written word consist only of potential experience until

    a mind puts it into motion by reading it. the body consists of biomass until a brain causes it to move. A brain consists of reactive nerves, until the that experence we call mind emerges from the continuous persistence of states.

    Just as we cannot observe the frames of video, we cannot observe the cycles of changes in state of the mind, and so we ‘average them’ through the persistence of stimuli across cycles.

    We do have a sense of self awareness that functions pre-cognitively, and can best be understood as that moment you awake in the dark and are unaware of your circumstances.

    It is this awareness of changes in state and like and dislikes that is ‘I’? Well, that is governed by genes. Is that ‘I’? Or am ‘i’ the combination of those genetic biases, that very simple state monitor, or at the other end, am ‘I’ that combination of body and memory in motion that you experience as a set of contsant relations ‘me?’.

    To the mentally ill person ‘i’ consists of a body in its current state. To the observer ‘i’ consists of a set of patterns of behavior given the experiences. To others (norm, law), ‘i’ consists of the rights and obligations to the host body.

    etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-10 15:54:00 UTC

  • LANGUAGE IS TRIVIALLY SIMPLE : A MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN GRAMMAR AND SEMATICS

    LANGUAGE IS TRIVIALLY SIMPLE : A MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN GRAMMAR AND SEMATICS

    Language is actually trivially simple: continuous disambiguation in grammar, and continuous ambiguity in semantics.

    The evolutionary problem is achieving in imagination the same level of modeling that we have in body movement.

    Once we had complex body movement (our neural density is far higher than other creatures) and complex motion-planning, it was somewhat deterministic that we could gain complex verbal planning.

    These problems seem difficult until you work with recursive neural networks long enough. Then the brain is a very simple thing that just far more neural computing power than any of our competing life forms.

    An octopus for example, is interesting, because while we have a spine that extends our brain into our body so to speak, the octopus has eight of them, and they do a lot of their own processing the way our heart and lungs do their own processing.

    Far too much ‘cheap’ philosophy, not enough ‘expensive’ physics, evolutionary biology, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence.

    Learn something substantial.

    Philosophy can assist us in determining choice, preferences and goods It is notoriously if not catastrophically faulty at anything we call ‘truth’.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-10 14:24:00 UTC