Source: Facebook

  • If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held

    If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held kinship territory, and not find good in those who didn’t. It’s really that simple.

    If your kin are not disciplined enough to hold territory they will not be disciplined enough to create competitieve commons.

    If they cannot create competitive commons there will be nothing to examine – no record of their existence – to comment upon.

    Commons create intergeneral capital. Kin groups (genes) create intergenerational capital. And to some degree you must trade off one against the other.

    Of course as always, the more eugenic your people the better their history.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 07:22:00 UTC

  • “Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”— They started with a post-pastoralist,

    —“Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”—

    They started with a post-pastoralist, migration period ,north sea gene pool untouched by urbanization (urbanization is dysgenic due to lower cost of opportunities. Cities are a trade-off).

    They started the organized application of manorialism first, and were at it the longest (commons). (And in some sense northern europeans seem to have practiced some variation on manorialism at least back to the corded ware era.)

    They built necessary and survival-dependent commons early (technology and commons).

    They built a dominant trading state with a tiny population and small territory using a navy (technology and commons )

    They produced some of the finest arts in the late medieval and early modern world (technological innovation in the arts).

    They avoided the problems of immigration despite their tolerance and trade. (Heavy normative demands)

    And as far as I know they were (until immigration) the best gene pool on earth for having done so. (see height and skull size)

    They have taken the pathetic disease of postwar virtue signaling to extremes and committed suicide.

    (I would live there but I’d be in jail for violating the speed limit so often. I build up hundreds of dollars of tickets every time I go there. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 07:18:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump): The Fake News Media never fails. H

    Retweeted Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump):

    The Fake News Media never fails. Hard to ignore this fact from the Vice President of Facebook Ads, Rob Goldman! https://t.co/XGC7ynZwYJ


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 22:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_43757840

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_43757840

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_437578402228039721_o_10156136631687264.jpg The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRightPaul NunezI like this a lot. I still have a hard time figuring out who originated this scale of hierarchy,though. Almost seems like I’ve heard it from somewhereFeb 17, 2018 9:55pmThe Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 21:41:00 UTC

  • “QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower) This is one of those ethnic qu

    –“QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower)

    This is one of those ethnic questions that’s misleading. Because it confuses the modern state of italy, with the italian peninsula with the people who live there, which include french, swiss german, german, austrian, northern italian (germanic), and southern italian (mediterranean and greek).

    Southern italians (especially from Naples south) are of greek and anatolian origins. Northern Italians whether very early (Etru) , Italian (Ital), or later ‘invaders) Germanic) are all of Danubian (Germanic) origins. People of Sardinia are the remainders of the earliest europeans. People of Sicily are a blend of pretty much everyone in the ancient world, because Sicily was an extremely important port for transporting goods around the mediterranean using the sailing technology available in the ancient world.

    **General Rule of Thumb: **

    If you work at it a bit you can pretty easily identify almost anyone’s tribal origins.

    Black hair and ‘swarthy” complexion and body hair = South route around the black sea = Anatolian/Eastern-Mediterranean/ Indo-Iranian. Or as I am often corrected “West Eurasians” (or middle easterners)

    Brown, Red, Blonde hair, very white complexion = Northern route around the Black Sea. Northern route people still exist in at least three if not four variations: atlantics, germanics (central europe), nordics, and northern and eastern slavs. The history of southern slavs is extremely complicated and I end up offending someone if I talk about it. But by and large they vary from very old peoples who started metalsmithing in what is today Bulgaria, to the remains of the steppe people who migrated there during the last major migration periods. The problem is that the spanish are largely from Atlantic and Celts and often have dark hair but are from the same lineage (R1b) – just less inbred with later versions of europeans.

    Something ‘very different’ happened around the black sea either before or after the deluge. we don’t know what but it caused repeated waves of expansion with the latest being the Yamna (horse) people what gave europe her ancient culture = although pre-yamna, yamna, germanic, christian, and modern values still exist if you understand which originated which set of ideas.

    But europeans, in general, regardless of earlier (southern), or later (multiple waves of northern), origins, evolve from what we (incorrectly) call ‘Caucuses’, but is apparently poland-ukraine-southern russia, with the caucuses the line of demarcation between the european, indo-iranian, and (now extinct) people that invaded india.

    The word Aryan is correct (Yamna expansion), but impolitic in the current century, and “White” is a poor substitute for Ethnic Europeans.

    We are, after all, all from the exceptional grazing and farmland between the north sea in poland, the black sea in ukraine, and the north of the caspian in southern russia.

    Europeans originated along the north sea, baltic sea, black sea, and caspian sea, and their russo finnic ancestors the arctic sea.

    It’s just that trade in the mediterranean was much more profitable for anyone – until the atlantic and now pacific came along.

    Some of us find it ironic that Poland is probably origin of the european diaspora. 😉

    Italy empirically (by all measures) consists of two very different countries – north and south. Just like Belgium has french and germanic under the same state. Just as americans have nine different cultures under the same state.

    The reason different countries do not separate is that it is economically disadvantagous to one party or both parties.

    For example, catalonia (wealthy and culturally and genetically different) vs spain (poor), and north italy vs south italy, and west ukraine vs east ukraine. and the northern states vs the southern states vs the plains states, vs the coastal west (ecotopia). Or canada vs quebec.

    All of these countries would be better off alone, but the industrial revolution and fiat credit made it difficult for small counteries to engage in defense.

    Today, a handful of nuclear weapons and an armed populace (switzerland) cna preserve independence (sovereignty) against any and everyone.

    **Therefore:**

    Italian = State (government)

    North italian and South Italian Countries (natural cultural and territorial differences)

    Italian Culture = Generally referring to language and diet and festivals

    Italy = a territory ranging from the alps to the tip of the peninsula.

    Ethnicity = European, vs Germanic vs Greek, vs Mediterranean are Ethnic Groups. Germanic = a prehistoric culture and myth of the home and hearth.

    Christianity = an old world mythology and literature of politics.

    Modernity = The enlightenment restoration of our ancient judicial, empirical, stoic and Aristotelian traditions.

    Three or four races. A handful of subraces. Thirty or so minor subraces. A few hundred super-tribes.

    Humans are endlessly fascinating. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 20:21:00 UTC

  • (FYI: I’ve posted Quora Moderation’s “Suppressions” on my web site. Any intellig

    (FYI: I’ve posted Quora Moderation’s “Suppressions” on my web site. Any intelligent person will see that they’re pretty straightforward attempts to counter propaganda.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 14:52:00 UTC

  • THE SUPPRESSION OF EUGENICS: SELF DIRECTED HUMAN EVOLUTION by Daniel Gurpide Eug

    THE SUPPRESSION OF EUGENICS: SELF DIRECTED HUMAN EVOLUTION

    by Daniel Gurpide

    Eugenics – meaning the applied science for the self-direction of human evolution – is nowadays the object of Freudian, hypocritical repression.

    Although one may say that eugenic concerns are an implicit constant in most post-Neolithic cultures, the essential question of eugenics flares up with the advent of the Darwinian revolution, and of Mendelian genetics—which has long been considered one and the same with eugenics. This arose in anticipation of a very real dysgenic risk in modern times that ‘traditional’ selective factors would break down.

    Galton, who coined the term, defined eugenics as ‘the study of all agencies under human control which can improve or impair the racial quality of future generations.’ The philanthropic motives that encouraged him to develop the new science are beyond question: `Man is gifted with pity and other kindly feelings; he has also the power of preventing many kinds of suffering. I conceive it to fall well within his province to replace Natural Selection by other processes that are more merciful and not less effective.` The way of hunger, death, stupidity, delusion, chance, and bare survival—natural selection—is thus replaced by the way of life, will, aspiration, and achievement—conscious evolution—not merely on a temporary and local basis, as in ancient Sparta, but permanently and universally.

    Breeding may itself be considered an early aristocratic technique. Yet, it was impossible to return to earlier Western social forms based on a hereditary aristocracy that had achieved their position by means of the military accomplishments of their ancestors. Hence, in the early twentieth century, a current of thought headed in the direction of developing a natural aristocracy based on intelligence, moral probity, and meritocratic social mobility. This was the heyday of eugenics as a belief system common among European elites—both liberal and conservative.

    Ultimately, the eugenics movement was shattered; it was a victim of the outcome of the Second World War, although eugenics was not expunged from polite society until the 1960s as an outcome of an energetic campaign by Holocaust-haunted egalitarian intellectuals bent on striking a blow against their rivals (nevertheless, in Sweden the eugenics programme continued until 1975).

    However, before it was ‘cursed,’ eugenics had long been perceived—essentially until the 1930s—as a ‘progressivist’ theme, since it was linked to concerns about the evolution of society in general (and correlated with the latter ‘taking charge of itself ’), to the extent that even Soviet intellectuals and scientists promoted its study.

    In Germany, the philosopher Peter Sloterdijk—politically on the left—recently argued that, given the understanding existing in genetic science, the eugenic dream of ‘selection’ is now within reach. Sloterdijk’s use of the word ‘selection’ horrified, of course, his colleagues, for whom the word evokes the ramp at Auschwitz. What most worried critics, however, was Sloterdijk’s argument that this capability should be exploited to breed a new generation of human beings. Coming after Sloterdijk’s open letter in Die Zeit attacking Jürgen Habermas as the representative of an outdated humanism, suggestions were made that he was ‘flirting with fascism,’ which reveals the uncertainty and fear still evoked by the issue of ‘conscious evolution.’ The Sloterdijk controversy demonstrates the almost exclusively ideological nature of contemporary discussions of eugenics. This has been accentuated by the increasing erosion, because of technoscientific progress, of the subjective costs of eugenic practices. Such costs have plummeted ever since the exposure of newborns, and the strict parental or communal control of mating gave way to the chemical or surgical sterilisation of severely retarded individuals, as well as to birth control. These have been succeeded by prematrimonial anamnesis—replaced, in turn, by prenatal diagnosis and genetic screening. In turn, these will be supplanted by IVF with embryo and gamete selection; and, finally, by direct therapeutic manipulation of germlines. In fact, in respect of contemporary and upcoming procedures, the natural empathy for the individuals concerned operates in an entirely favourable sense—to the point of rendering unconditional rejection of eugenics an increasingly embarrassing and untenable position.

    The key issue regarding eugenics are which countries will develop it to its fullest extent. Francis Galton had already predicted in 1909 that ‘the nation which first subjects itself to a rational eugenical discipline is bound to inherit the earth.’


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 14:50:00 UTC

  • INTERFERENCE IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF JUSTIFYING HOME RULE. We do it, the russians

    INTERFERENCE IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF JUSTIFYING HOME RULE.

    We do it, the russians have done if for generations, and now the chinese are doing it: which is to cause external instability via propaganda through public intellectuals and activists in order to justify the current order at home.

    The difference is that surprisingly the russians and especially the chinese are right – and we have been wrong all along.

    COMMUNISMI IN AMERICA > SAUL ALINSKY > HILLARY CLINTON > BARAK OBAMA

    All these people were the result of russian interference in our social order…. Just as Perestroika, and the upset in the communist world was the result of our interference.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 14:01:00 UTC

  • USE BING TO IMPROVE YOUR WELL BEING I want to reiterate, and stay on message, th

    USE BING TO IMPROVE YOUR WELL BEING

    I want to reiterate, and stay on message, that if you use Bing instead of Google your Marxist, Postmodernist, SJW dosage will decrease and as such your general happiness will increase. The bias in Google is … well, I ought to spend a few days measuring it. But it’s as severe as anything russia and china have produced.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 13:54:00 UTC

  • The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct

    The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 12:42:00 UTC