Source: Facebook

  • THE SPECTRUM OF REFERENTS WE CALL GODS I dunno. I think we just use the word ‘go

    THE SPECTRUM OF REFERENTS WE CALL GODS

    I dunno. I think we just use the word ‘god’ to represent increasingly poetic references. It’s the simple people for whom that poetry is existential and anthropomorphic, common people for whom it is literary, atheists who are in between (‘educated’) for whom it is pseudoscience or deceit, and the sophisticated people for whom it is poetry (aesthetic).

    I talk to my god every day. But my understanding of ‘god’ would to an atheist make sense, but be silly. To an ordinary person not refer to god at all, and to literalists be atheism.

    The reason people at the bottom are more attracted to the divine is to ‘know’ right action, feeling, and belief, and take comfort in right action, feeling, and belief, and therefore giving them confidence in right action, feeling, and belief – without being persuaded (manipulated) by those with greater abilities and lower ethics and morality. In other words, religions give people a shield against guilt, manipulation, coercion, and risk.

    Religion was successful because mindfulness(certainty, clarity, confidence) is increasingly necessary as you move left on the curve.

    I have been working on this question for I think three or four years now and the phenomenon is widespread, and not limited to religion, but philosophy, and the modern social pseudosciences, and even literature.

    We evolved in bands where the entire group functioned as a single distributed nervous system. We prospered by extending our numbers beyond our ability to perceive. So we needed rules (limits) and goods (objectives), and we eventually needed writing, numbers, money (prices really), and governments (commons), to coordinate our actions in large numbers.

    But while we gained increasingly diverse physical certainties, they came at the high cost of mental and emotional certainties. At this point we are comforted primarily by consumption and (at least in america) we are seeing extraordinary increases in suicide among the aged. So we are extremely ‘alone’. And as alone we search for some sort of membership and shared understanding, by which to obtain the certainty of our evolutionary history in bands.

    Hence the expansion of social media among the verbally acute.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-11 09:44:00 UTC

  • Mar 10, 2018, 9:36 PM

    https://www.quora.com/Who-is-the-most-influential-living-philosopher-1/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=b44bec67&srid=u4QvUpdated Mar 10, 2018, 9:36 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 21:36:00 UTC

  • THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and und

    THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES

    The lifting of the laboring and underclasses from subsistence to consumption was made possible by the increases in relative productivity.

    In other words, we are simply wealthy enough that we can afford (for a time) to reverse four thousand years of the domestication of human groups, by the rapid expansion of th eunderclasses and their movement from rural agrarian marginal self-sustenance to

    Nothing occurred because of feminine (left’s) good intentions, but instead the left caused the consumption of increases in productivity as increases in population rather than the traditional western means of increasing the commons.

    People were not oppressed. They were domesticated, generation by generation like every other animal through harsh winters, manorialism (most important) and aggressive hanging of up to one percent of the population every year.

    The industrial revolution reversed the trend, and we have already lost one standard deviation in median intelligence in the much of the west through dysgenia.

    Cities are exacerbating the issue since they are IQ and ovary graveyards.

    This is just the data.

    It is what it is.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 18:22:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 14:19:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline

    Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 14:19:00 UTC

  • “The 2nd amendment *IS* the Constitution. Everything else just describes procedu

    –“The 2nd amendment *IS* the Constitution. Everything else just describes procedure.”–

    – Steve Pender


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 14:18:00 UTC

  • Updated Mar 10, 2018, 11:30 AM

    Updated Mar 10, 2018, 11:30 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 11:30:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 11:30:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline

    Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 11:30:00 UTC

  • Oh. I like that framing: – You empty a 9mm – You double-tap/mozambique a 45. – A

    Oh. I like that framing:

    – You empty a 9mm

    – You double-tap/mozambique a 45.

    – And you fire a 10mm once.

    I think I’m going to stick with that one.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 11:29:00 UTC