Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • NO. EUPHEMISMS OBSCURE CAUSE AND SOLUTION We aren’t living in ‘parallel societie

    NO. EUPHEMISMS OBSCURE CAUSE AND SOLUTION

    We aren’t living in ‘parallel societies’ we are living in a EMPIRE just like every other empire in history, and this particular empire has vastly outlived its usefulness.

    Revolt.Separate.Diversify.Specialize.Compete.Innovate.Prosper.

    The answer is simple. We are wealthy enough to afford to express our differing reproductive strategies – strategies in which we can signal our fitness for that strategy optimally.

    There exist only three methods of coercion? masculine violence, and hierarchy, neutral exchange and meritocracy, and feminine disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and rallying and equality.

    The political spectrum reflects these reproductive strategies. (conservative masculine concentration of capital, libertarian exchange-neutral production of capital, and progressive redistributive communal consumption of capital.

    The only solution by which each obtains his optimum interest is by the production of commons best negotiated in his interests.

    Ergo – revolte, separate, diversity, specialize, compete, innovate, and prosper.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 12:19:00 UTC

  • “…naturalistic fallacy…”— I don’t commit naturalistic fallacies – which st

    —“…naturalistic fallacy…”—

    I don’t commit naturalistic fallacies – which states that we must do something because it is present in nature. I simply describe what we do, as evidence we already mirror natural processes.

    The only moral rule is reciprocity (do not unto others). The pretense-of-kinship fallacy, is that we are obligated to redistribution and cooperation, rather than ‘cooperation is only valuable until it is not.

    you aren’t my associate, my friend, my kin, my people, and therefore you are only valuable to me as a trading partner and then only so if you are a productive trading partner.

    Otherwise you are just a competitor for resources.

    And I always have the choice of avoidance of your parasitism, trade, or predation upon you.

    And your argument is that you should be able to parasitically extract from me and mine.

    That is all you are doing. Pretense of kinship or partner, when you are merely seeking rents (parasitism).

    Your argument is testable. Sorry. It just is.

    All human argument is reducible to some transfer.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 10:27:00 UTC

  • Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide

    Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas.

    Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”.

    Peterson: “Like Canada”

    Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?”

    Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.”

    Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?”

    Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.”

    https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s

    Eric Danelaw

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 10:26:00 UTC

  • “All money is someone’s debt backed by a promise to redeem the debt. When the mo

    —“All money is someone’s debt backed by a promise to redeem the debt. When the money is issued by the state, then you have its vast assets backing its value and so liquidity is increased compared with individuals issuing currency. This is why the sovereign often appears on the currency.”—-

    Nope. credit money might be. But commodity money is a store of value already produced. That is what separates commodity money (value stored), fiduciary media (value borrowed), and credit money (value promised), and fiat money – meaning shares in the economy (future value speculated upon).

    You are using the term ‘money’ by cherry picking properties to suit your argument.

    The diagram above lists the categories of money from commodity through trade credit. Money = commodity money.

    Everything else is a substitute of decreasing liquidity of temporal value.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 10:21:00 UTC

  • YOUR PURPOSE? LET ME TELL YOU… Your purpose as is the purpose of every other l

    YOUR PURPOSE? LET ME TELL YOU…

    Your purpose as is the purpose of every other life form is to perpetuate your genes by the capture of differences in rates of entropy and to expend it as waste heat. That’s your purpose. You perpetuate the temporary concentration of energy as a means of producing higher returns on the concentration of energy.

    Our ability to think and remember evolved for very simple reasons: creatures that can empathize with intent, imitate, and cooperate without violating reciprocity, can, through the cooperateive concentration of energy on high returns, produce greater caloric capture than any other evolutionary solution the universe has yet discovered by trial and error.

    However, since self awareness has been a byproduct of that evolutionary innovation, and since along with that self awareness is the need to be valued by (useful to others) because otherwise we would have less incentive to cooperate and produce outsized returns – you need to find some means of surviving while at the same time either feeling not-harmful, useful if possible, and contributory if possible, and dramatically contributory if possible, because this is what status signals and fulfillment refer to.

    Most unsatisfied (unfulfilled) people are unwilling to or unable to admit their low potential, low value, low status, and low contribution and will not spend the effort to obtain mediocre returns suited to their abilities.

    hence why charity is so attractive and useful – it takes very little effort to produce outsized cooperative returns for those of even less value to others than you are.

    This chain of providing value to those less valuable to than you are is how the entire in-class, and cross-class, social, economic, political, and military hierarchy manages to function given that some of us are unfit, unattractive, have undesirable personalities, and are stupid, are from bad families, and bad groups – and some of us are fit, attractive, have desirable personalities, are intelligent and from good families and groups.

    Come to terms with your status and ability and serve those who need your service. This is why christians are so disproportionately happy and christian civilizations are so disproportionately productive: we are mercilness with producing purely empirical status signals. everyone else tries to fake them.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 10:05:00 UTC

  • SUPERIORITY AND INFERIORITY ARE PURELY EMPIRICAL MEASURES Inferiority and superi

    SUPERIORITY AND INFERIORITY ARE PURELY EMPIRICAL MEASURES

    Inferiority and superiority are simply a measurement of agency. They’re purely empirical assessments. Either one possesses agency of the self, the group, the environment, the universe, or one does not. The inferior cannot compete. The superior can. This competition whether internal interpersonal political environmental or physical is the only empirical test of superiority and inferiority. Evolution and entropy never stop. They are ceaseless. The superior evolves, adapts, increases its agency, and the inferior does not, and dies, and evolution and entropy continue their battle. This is not an opinion or a value statement, it is a description of every single process in the universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 09:47:00 UTC

  • WHY WESTERNERS ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO ETHICAL DUPLICITY Israeli (self) vs other (hos

    WHY WESTERNERS ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO ETHICAL DUPLICITY

    Israeli (self) vs other (host) ethics is a continuation of ghetto ethics (one standard for you and one for me) – western ethics requires reciprocity. We hear (((arguments))) assuming reciprocity. (((They))) make (((arguments))) assuming reciprocity. That is why we are fooled, every day, time and time again by (((pilpul))) – we are the only high trust civilization that metaphysically assumes reciprocity, and therefore we are we are uniquely vulnerable to (((deception))), just as we are far less vulnerable to violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 09:42:00 UTC

  • OUR ONLY ASSET IS TIME. POVERTY DIDN’T EVOLVE. WEALTH DID. Poverty didn’t evolve

    OUR ONLY ASSET IS TIME. POVERTY DIDN’T EVOLVE. WEALTH DID.

    Poverty didn’t evolve, wealth and money evolved.

    Poverty is merely a relative assessment of one’s ability to consume.

    Hence why indigenous peoples commit suicide in droves once aware of their relative condition.

    That relative condition is poverty.

    However, it can only be known to be poverty once one is aware of a relative condition.

    Prosperity (wealth) evolved from the division of labor.

    Money of some kind (commodities) is necessary to remove frictions to the coincidence of wants in a division of labor.

    Prices are necessary to allow planning, complex production of multi-part products and services, credit, and debt.

    Non-Commodity Money is necessary to reduce frictions to the coincidence of wants, that limits the expansion of trade.

    ****Our only asset is time. We are not wealthier than cavemen. We have simply made all goods, services, and information cheaper, through the division of knowledge and labor using the information system we call money and prices. This is the most important lesson of economics. All understanding of wealth exists in this one paragraph.****

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 09:31:00 UTC

  • “Traditionalists make the presumption that Christian ideas had positive effects

    —“Traditionalists make the presumption that Christian ideas had positive effects in Europe. But Ideas do not change behaviour – law does. Christianity put in places LAWS which had a positive effect and those laws were largely Celtic and Roman derivatives. The ideas meant very little, law on the other hand we know has had measurable effects.”— Bill Joslin

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 01:24:00 UTC

  • Mar 13, 2018, 1:13 AM

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-7-deadly-sins-of-programming/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=b6e44f8d&srid=u4QvUpdated Mar 13, 2018, 1:13 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 01:13:00 UTC