POPE?
Too liberal? He’s looked at the numbers and the church is and always has been a business – and he’s following the incentives: the church is only going to survive in room temperature IQ communities. Foolish because it’s not that we don’t want the church. We just want our own.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:50:00 UTC
THE FREQUENCY OF DISASTERS
The causal relation between disasters and frequency is population density to lower the cost of infrastructure so that taxes can be directed to the bureaucracy’s payroll and pensions (really, thats the reason).
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:50:00 UTC
I thought only little girls used name calling, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and gossip as a substitute for argument. Men make arguments, and warrant their veracity at the risk of violence. If you decide to wear pants, and make an argument, I’m happy to defeat you. 😉
Unfortunately, we must now perform our ‘mansplaining’ for overweight, low testosterone, fatherless, uncompetitive, unproductive, video-game playing, comic-reading, underdeveloped males as well as our wives and daughters. 😉 it’s a dirty job but men have to do it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:50:00 UTC
—“We suffer under Universal-Suffrage Authoritarianism.”— Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 15:35:00 UTC
( I quote the church all the time, but I translate the work of the scholastics into secular prose)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:44:00 UTC
KILL ALL THE PSEUDOSCIENTISTS, AND PHILOSOPHERS, THEOLOGIANS? 😉
The philosophy of Marx, Lenin, and Mao (version two) cost >100M lives and the World wars, as well as that of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (version one) cost > 500M lives (islam), the destruction of the four great civilizations of the ancient world(islam), and a 1500 year dark age (christianity and islam).
And that’s before we even start thinking about all the others. The damage Kant did alone to german thought (Rousseau > Kant > Continental Philosophy > Marxism > Postmodernism) is certainly as damaging as version one (judaism, christianity, islam).
Why are the idealists, utopians, and theologians all writers who cause deaths by the excitement to suicide of millions?
Philosophy in its forms of pseudohistory, pseudoscience, pseudorationalism, and occult, has done more damage than anything other than malaria, smallpox, and the great plagues.
I mean, by this measure, we should kill everyone who speaks in fictionalisms: pseudoscience, rationalism, utopianism, supernaturalism.
It might be the single best improvement in mankind since the invention of antibiotics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:40:00 UTC
BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy is limited to the determination of personal choice, and interpersonal good. And that is probably all that is left for philosophers to judge.
Truth is now in the domain of science – as it should have been all along.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:29:00 UTC
Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the commons) is an excellent idea, as long as (a) this does not affect the monarchy and the military, and (b) as long as it is not asymmetric among the classes. In other words, those who have greater responsibilities and those who have lesser responsibilities must both agree. The real problem of democracy was (a) women and (b) underclasses and (c) vast immigration of underclass (including the catholics who are white.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:06:00 UTC
The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence.
In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men.
Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:49:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veVONaeTBVMYOU DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT YOU MUST.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.Updated Mar 16, 2018, 12:48 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:48:00 UTC