Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline

    Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:42:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:41:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline

    Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:41:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:40:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline

    Eric Danelaw shared a post to your timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:40:00 UTC

  • Mar 17, 2018, 6:50 PM

    https://www.quora.com/Have-you-met-anyone-truly-evil-What-makes-them-evil-according-to-you/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=3892a4b3&srid=u4QvUpdated Mar 17, 2018, 6:50 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 18:50:00 UTC

  • I SAY ‘NO COUNTRY HAS EVER BEEN SO FRAGILE, AND NO GOVERNMENT SO DESPISED AND RE

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/britain-apos-four-meals-away-060000661.htmlWHEN I SAY ‘NO COUNTRY HAS EVER BEEN SO FRAGILE, AND NO GOVERNMENT SO DESPISED AND REVOLUTION IS TRIVIAL’ — this is the reason why.

    Three hours of electricity. two days of water, three days of food.

    In the LA Riots …..Updated Mar 17, 2018, 2:20 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:20:00 UTC

  • MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LIBERTARIAN IDENTITY —“And you call yourself libertar

    MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LIBERTARIAN IDENTITY

    —“And you call yourself libertarian. Lol”—

    So you mean, you don’t understand semantics, grammar, consistency, correspondence, coherence, parsimony and falsifiability?

    The only requirement for a libertarian identity is sovereignty, and therefore reciprocity, and therefore reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity.

    Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate reciprocity and therefore sovereignty, and therefore insurance of reciprocity and sovereignty.

    Either you can warranty your words our you are externalizing costs of doing so onto others.

    Truthful – meaning warrantied – speech doesn’t violate reciprocity. Un-warrantied speech does.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 11:40:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/28828175_199350507328514_91570000979

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/28828175_199350507328514_91570000979

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/28828175_199350507328514_9157000097975688251_o_199350507328514.jpg OMG. PERFECTIONOMG. PERFECTION

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 11:17:00 UTC

  • “BUT WHAT DID ROTHBARD INNOVATE?”— 1 – (Respectfully) I always think that’s a

    —“BUT WHAT DID ROTHBARD INNOVATE?”—

    1 – (Respectfully) I always think that’s a rather ridiculous question since of empiricism (Aristotle), Self Improvement(Zeno), Moral Literature (Plato), and Rational Mythology (Augustine), it’s easy to state that all of philosophy is merely footnotes stated in current vocabulary.

    2 – My reading of rothbard, particularly “for a new liberty” was that he was (a) trying to restated jewish borderland (ukrainian) low trust ethics, in anglo-jeffersonian high trust terms, and (b) trying to reduce social science to an informal logic. Did he or did Hoppe?

    3 – My reading (because I learned it from him) is that Hoppe completed that program, unfortunately, using Kantian > Marxist rationalism, rather than anglo empiricism (law). I just converted it to scientific rather than justificationary prose.

    4 – Every thinker is only partly right. My beef with rothbard is that he conflated low trust ethics with high trust ethics, and conducted an pseudoscientific war on the commons as marx did on private property. The only one who was right was Hayek: it’s all just reducible to law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 10:52:00 UTC