—“If masculinity were truly toxic, then fatherlessness wouldn’t be correlated with literally every societal ill.”— Ana Stowe
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 18:01:00 UTC
—“If masculinity were truly toxic, then fatherlessness wouldn’t be correlated with literally every societal ill.”— Ana Stowe
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 18:01:00 UTC
( I am an american citizen. I have been writing patriotic advocacy since the early 1980s. I have an employee record as a member of the justice department, a long tax history, a long business history, and a contract with ‘the state department’ for certain unspecified services for which I would not have been permitted if I was other than a patriot. I use my real name. I say everything in the open. My objective is patriotic and in defense of the constitution. My purpose is to restore that constitution to its original intent by providing the means of strictly constructing natural law. I do not participate in or encourage direct action only counsel on what I understand is a deterministic future conflict due to deterministic, uncontrollable, conflicts of interest. I don’t ‘hate’ on anyone – I criticize all peoples equally. And I have done all this intentionally. When dam is going to break of its own natural accord, some of us plan for it, some of us scribe it so it breaks where its optimum, and some of us figure out what to do with the pressure released, so that it produces some form of good. I am absolutely certain that a very large percentage of the population will at least appreciate, if not advocate, the legal, political, and economic solutions I recommend -and that any who don’t, will self-select as identifiable criminals engaged in conspiracy and fraud – even if only conspiracy and fraud of ignorance and convenience. )
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 17:37:00 UTC
( I miss my dog. )
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 13:54:00 UTC
—“Understanding is hard. Obedience is easy. This is partially reversed if you’re autistic, but probably not fully.”— Ely Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 13:02:00 UTC
—“It’s only worthwhile to argue equality from a position of inferiority.”—Ely Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 12:23:00 UTC
“CURT: WHEN WILL THE NEXT CORRECTION (COLLAPSE) OCCUR?”
—“Curt, when do you think is the next economic / financial crisis slanted? Somebody I know well and trust, who got out of dodge last time around, is expecting it to be less than 18 months out, as indicated by the inverted bond yield curve. Is this accurate?”—- Moritz Bierling
I have been saying that it looks to me like 2017-2020 since 2006. And that we would have some vast reorganizational catastrophe between 2020 and 2025.
I was paying a lot of attention prior to the crisis, and so I was spot on (within 30 days) of estimating it correctly. Even the 2014 return.
(I was conversely waaaaaaaaay off on China, which I thought would run out of options by 2010, but is deftly managing their equilibration and converting to totalitarianism before their great correction).
I am not paying close enough attention to patterns today, so your friend is probably correct. I don’t need greater precision for my work. The reason being that I’m trying to provide “what to do about it” in advance – although still behind schedule.
My understanding, and my strategy, is that we will see convergence in the next 24 months and that will begin the next ‘great wars’ era, because (a) the civil unrest will occupy the west, and (b) world powers in waiting will seize the opportunity, (c) both because they can afford to, and (d) because our ‘model’ (democracy) will have been proven wrong, so they will ‘advance’ under a sense of ‘moral authority to right a tragic wrong’.
I think it is extremely unlikely that I err.
Why? Humans always pursue available incentives.
(PS:
1) I can tell by the loans being generated that we are at the limit of possible credit expansion and I suspect the bond yield is reflecting it.
2) I can tell by the absolutely certain future direction of oil prices that this will coincide with and partly drive the rest of the outcomes I anticipate.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 12:19:00 UTC
REGARDING “PROPERTARIANISM FOR DUMMIES”
FYI: It’s a joke. There is no possible way to make: Acquisitionism -> Testimonialism -> Propertarianism -> Natural Law, for ‘dummies’, any more than there is formal logic, systems programming, or the calculus.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:40:00 UTC
A judge of natural law does not depend upon the comprehension of the judged, any more than a mathematician on the comprehension of the audience.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:08:00 UTC
Understanding is overrated, and volition over-estimated. I don’t expect people to understand. I only expect them to obey natural law or bear the painful consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:04:00 UTC
Soldiers should believe themselves valorous and a general should let them. But the reason they win is they were given an opportunity by the generals such that valor was a plentiful reward for them to obtain.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:00:00 UTC