https://www.fastcompany.com/40563225/chinas-terrifying-social-credit-surveillance-system-is-expandinghttps://www.fastcompany.com/40563225/chinas-terrifying-social-credit-surveillance-system-is-expanding
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 19:59:00 UTC
https://www.fastcompany.com/40563225/chinas-terrifying-social-credit-surveillance-system-is-expandinghttps://www.fastcompany.com/40563225/chinas-terrifying-social-credit-surveillance-system-is-expanding
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 19:59:00 UTC
My understanding is that men cheat but rarely defect. Women cheat and more frequently defect. The reason being that other than novelty and cost of access, women are marginally indifferent in utility. Whereas other than novelty, men are marginally different in utility. Most of the time, people cheat for novelty, test of sexual market value, and retaliation.
Economics in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 18:41:00 UTC
INCOME DIFFERENCES
Specialization in truth, calculation, competition, risk, and winning conflicts is more of a competitive advantage at the top of the organization.
Salary Differences are most often (a) that specialization, and (b) loyalty payments.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 18:35:00 UTC
https://youtu.be/UxpVwBzFAkwWOMEN AND MEN DIFFER DRAMATICALLY IN LOYALTY
via @[100003258598828:2048:John Fouad]
This is the difference in our moral and political intuitions.
It’s an evolutionary necessity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 18:26:00 UTC
https://youtu.be/UxpVwBzFAkwWOMEN AND MEN DIFFER DRAMATICALLY IN LOYALTY
via John Fouad
This is the difference in our moral and political intuitions.
It’s an evolutionary necessity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 18:26:00 UTC
THERE ISN’T ANY SHORTCUT TO WISDOM
Bill just made a good point that I sort of beat around the bush about.
There isn’t any shortcut.
You are either going to read enough basic history, and then learn the operational deconstruction of incentives from me, or you aren’t.
There isn’t any shortcut. There isn’t one book. There is however a series of books that are the minimum you’ll need. But that’s not easy.
My book will teach you the science and logic of natural law, and all that it entails. But it will simply explain how to make all the knowledge of all the disciplines, commensurable – into a single universal language.
That said, history provides the storytelling. And it’s the stories we remember.
Stories serve as search algorithms.
Logic serves as recipes.
Science insures we don’t err.
We have had enough of us working to gether now that very smart people with a scientific education and knowledge of computer science, and a bit of history can grasp the ideas within a year.
For most people it takes two to understand, and another one or two to master the use of.
Which is like any other STEM discipline.
‘Cause it’s like any other STEM discipline…..
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 18:23:00 UTC
by Candice Mary
When foreigners kill men’s comrades and give them the option to surrender and become slaves, men attack.
Women ask instead “what language do we speak? What god do we worship?”
Women evolved to shape themselves to the men who capture them.
Now, just replace “Foreign men” with “Government” and there is the answer.
We can be mad about that or accept reality and manage it.
“Women seek and adapt to power.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 17:17:00 UTC
–“Melania Trump has more children than the leaders of Germany, France, England and Italy combined.”– Steve Pender
The leaders of genocide are genocidal. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 13:37:00 UTC
http://propertarianism.com/reading-listRECOMMENDED READING?
—“Curt, What are the top 3 nonfiction books (the less known, the better) you would recommend?”—
I don’t think I can narrow it to three. Maybe three in each discipline. My reading list is at propertarianism.com/reading-list http://propertarianism.com/reading-list and the first section “the short list’ includes what I recommend. Notice that I rarely if ever recommend philosophy, and almost always recommend history.
I think If I had to suggest the minimum it would be:
BASICS (EASY)
1 – Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain)
2 – Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition)
3 – Hazlitt: economics in one lesson
4 – Durant: Lessons of History
HISTORY
1 – Keegan’s History of Warfare
2 – Karen Armstrong : The Great Transformation
3 – Emmanuel Todd: The Invention of Europe
4 – Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law.
THE PROBLEM
7 – Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective)
8 – Fukuyama: The Origins Of Political Order 1
9 – Fukuyama: The Origins Of Political Order 2
Roughly speaking that gives you military, religious, economic-cultural, and legal history, which comprise, as I understand it, the social sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 09:51:00 UTC
http://propertarianism.com/reading-listRECOMMENDED READING?
—“Curt, What are the top 3 nonfiction books (the less known, the better) you would recommend?”—
I don’t think I can narrow it to three. Maybe three in each discipline. My reading list is at propertarianism.com/reading-list and the first section “the short list’ includes what I recommend. Notice that I rarely if ever recommend philosophy, and almost always recommend history.
I think If I had to suggest the minimum it would be:
BASICS (EASY)
1 – Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain)
2 – Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition)
3 – Hazlitt: economics in one lesson
4 – Durant: Lessons of History
HISTORY
1 – Keegan’s History of Warfare
2 – Karen Armstrong : The Great Transformation
3 – Emmanuel Todd: The Invention of Europe
4 – Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law.
THE PROBLEM
7 – Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective)
8 – Fukuyama: The Origins Of Political Order 1
9 – Fukuyama: The Origins Of Political Order 2
Roughly speaking that gives you military, religious, economic-cultural, and legal history, which comprise, as I understand it, the social sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 09:51:00 UTC