Source: Facebook

  • LOWER VERBAL ABILITY AND THE CONSEQUENCES by Liam Eddy Lower verbal ability is d

    LOWER VERBAL ABILITY AND THE CONSEQUENCES

    by Liam Eddy

    Lower verbal ability is due to the structure of the brain. The recognition of feeling occurs in the left hemisphere while the ability to speak is governed in the right. When there is a little cross over between the hemispheres alexithymia is common.

    Common in the people who demonstrate alexithymia are executive function defects.

    What happens when a person who cannot label their emotions, with little executive function (Impulse control etc), is in a public environment?

    Opportunity leads to crime.

    Frustration leads to aggression.

    —-

    ALEXITHYMIA: the inability to identify and describe one’s emotions. Dysfunction in emotional awareness, social attachment, and interpersonal relations.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 09:39:00 UTC

  • YES, STUPID PEOPLE CREATE MORE CRIME People commit crimes across the spectrum. S

    YES, STUPID PEOPLE CREATE MORE CRIME

    People commit crimes across the spectrum.

    State and Local IQ corresponds to crime rates.

    Stupid people get caught more often.

    Stupid people tend to pursue low risk low reward crimes. (those requiring little planning and high opportunism)

    When it comes to murder a surprisingly high percentage of murderers are caught.

    I use the term evil 80’s but the average criminal has an IQ of 93, which only serves to confirm my position that while the median of the distribution is 100, the medium of the distribution needs to be above 106, and closer to 110, leaving a full standard deviation between the median and the border of criminality 95 to preserve a high trust society.

    But in general the evil 80’s (probably up to 95) demographic (a) is universally outcast, (b) undesirable even to each other, (c) cannot trust information, particularly from each other, (d) personalizes it to ‘oppression’ rather than “avoidance”, (e) justifies his behavior as retaliation for that treatment (f) is still smart enough to profit from immorality if not smart enough to profit from morality. (g) this includes the ability to practice all forms of criminal behavior and develop skill at avoiding being caught.

    Not surprisingly (which is worth noting) criminals consistently measure with lower verbal ability. Hence my arguments that I’m not sure that the primary evolution out of africa is almost entirely verbal.

    —“Lower verbal ability is due to the structure of the brain. The recognition of feeling occurs in the left hemisphere while the ability to speak is governed in the right. When there is a little cross over between the hemispheres alexithymia is common. Common in the people who demonstrate alexithymia are executive function defects.”— Liam Eddy

    So just as you see greater verbal ability in ashkenazi, greater spatial in east asians, a balance in whites, you see deficiencies in every other group. But out of these deficiencies, (a) personality defects (b) cultural reinforcement of those defects, and (c) lower verbal IQ – exaggerate the problem.

    Worse, the ‘multiplier’ is aggression. Meaning that the higher the aggression in the personality the more expressed is the criminality of low IQ. Again, this is why I’m a critic of adding peoples who have not undergone the manorial transformation (filter) to the european gene pool, and social and political orders. They bring with them permanently defective genes.

    We forget that the primary difference between whites and ashkenazi of same ability is aggression, and that this aggression is as much or more responsible for their ability to carry intellectual workloads as well as make use of their intelligence competitively.

    African americans are highly pro social (extroverted), but very negatively distributed, and even in that distribution they are negatively biased in verbal ability, AND they mature much earlier, faster, and deeper.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 07:25:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 01:42:00 UTC

  • James Woods (@RealJamesWoods): This guy has done to beautiful London what centur

    https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/988493813533601794/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=989681969670836225Retweeted James Woods (@RealJamesWoods):

    This guy has done to beautiful London what centuries of invaders failed to do… https://t.co/cD1vRgy5Dn


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 21:45:00 UTC

  • A WORLD WITHOUT MONEY? —“What would happen if there were no money on earth?”–

    A WORLD WITHOUT MONEY?

    —“What would happen if there were no money on earth?”–

    (Repost) Answered May 1, 2013

    Believe it or not, this subject has been given quite a bit of treatment in the literature – mostly during the early part of the last century in response to the communist, socialist and fascist movements.

    REALITY:

    Almost everyone, on the planet, except for perhaps ~500M subsistence farmers would die in the first 30-90 days. Yes. Really. Seriously.

    MONEY

    Money makes planning of complex things possible.

    Humans literally cannot ‘think’ as we understand the term, without numbers, money, property, contracts, credit and interest. Just as drawings and written words help us remember things, numbers help us remember things we could not remember, think about, or compare without them. Money makes numbers possible to apply to things that are DIFFERENT. Whereas numbers without money can only be used for things that are the SAME. As such, we say that money makes it possible to compare objects that are otherwise incommensurable. Money renders the world commensurable: open to planning and the use of mathematics (measurement and forecasting).

    In practical terms, money and prices form an information system that tells us all what to do in real time in response to what others want and need. It is how we tell each other how to cooperate. It is the human social system. And the use of that social system, plus the capture of fossile fuel, has taken us out of ignorance and poverty.

    CONVERSELY

    What money and credit have also done is make it possible to breed again up to new malthusian levels. While Malthus was only half right, he was half right. Group selection accomplishes what malthus did not account for. THe general belief of ‘progressives’ is that technology will ‘save us again’ just like agrarianism, and then pastoralism saved us in the past. But the truth is we just breed up to these levels again, and reduce ourselves back to poverty.

    The problem then is that we must control our breeding. And that has been, except for a brief period in china, or the middle ages in England under Manorialism impossible to achieve. Partly because it is so profitable to sell things to people who bear children, and those children as they too mature.

    EXAMPLES

    THe US economy is primarily driven by housing, and the high rate of return on lending for housing, and the large supply of labor jobs for the production of housing. From this perspective, the exceptional nature of the american economy is not the product of ‘democracy’ or innovation, but the product of selling off a continent to waves of immigrants and their offspring, and using the profits from the sale of the (conquered) continent to invest in increasingly complex technologies.

    THe Chinese for example have figured this out and are doing the same thing but moving people from the ‘poor’ village farm to cities where they *hope* the population will be more productive than they were at subsistence farming. China can do this bcause it adopted consumer capitalism (money, prices and interest) and abandoned communism (no money, no prices, and no interest).

    The problem other countries face (India and say, Ukraine) is india is so pervasively corrupt that it’s not possible to create infrastructure without privatization of the investment through corruption, and the population is still expanding unsustainably in a dirty and hot environment. THe problem Ukraine faces, is that it cannot play ‘china’ because the lower levels of government are so corrupt and the country sees no demand for its currency, so the government cannot issue credit, and therefore the people remain poor.

    IN CLOSING

    When you say ‘money went away’ what you must also understand is that with money and prices will go the ability to communicate, and think. Literally. Humans would not be able to cooperate, communicate, plan and think without money. Worse, they would have no incentive to do so, because to have an incentive one must be able to think of something to do. And you couldn’t think of anything to do that you couldn’t do with your own two hands.

    THere is about 4 days worth of energy, and 14 days worth of food in the pipeline. If you made money vanish, you would need to make 6B people vanish along with it.

    You may find a more thorough, or a more simplistic answer elsewhere. But this is the answer, and there isn’t any alternative.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 21:35:00 UTC

  • What is it with morons coming out of the woodwork lately?

    What is it with morons coming out of the woodwork lately?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 20:51:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.quora.com/Are-calls-for-dramatically-increasing-cultural-diversity-essentially-calls-for-the-replacing-of-Western-Civilization-with-something-else/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=520d2dba&srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 20:48:00 UTC

  • REGIONS SUCCEED FOR REASONS —“There is a sizeable body of research on what mak

    REGIONS SUCCEED FOR REASONS

    —“There is a sizeable body of research on what makes some regions consistently able to produce high-growth companies compared with other regions. Overall, what appears to matter most is a density of smart people of prime entrepreneurship age (mid-career) with an orientation towards entrepreneurship and the pursuit of enterprise in knowledge-intensive activities—plus a bunch of other stuff that we aren’t measuring very well in a systematic way (namely, network and culture).”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:27:00 UTC

  • THE MARKET FOR DRONE OPERATORS COWEN: Drones? SRINIVASAN: Underrated. COWEN: Why

    THE MARKET FOR DRONE OPERATORS

    COWEN: Drones?

    SRINIVASAN: Underrated.

    COWEN: Why? What will they do that we haven’t thought of?

    SRINIVASAN: Construction. There’s different kinds of drones. They’re not just flying drones. There’s swimming drones and there’s walking drones and so on.

    Like the example I mentioned where you can teleport into a robot and then control that, Skype into a robot and control that on other side of the world. That’s going to be something where maybe you’re going to have it in drone mode so it walks to the destination. You’ll be asleep and then you wake up and it’s at the destination.

    Drones are going to be a very big deal. There’s this interesting movie called Surrogates, which actually talks about what a really big drone/telepresence future would look like. People never leave their homes because, instead, they just Skype into a really good-looking drone/telepresent version of themselves, and they walk around in that.

    If they’re hit by a car, it doesn’t matter because they can just rejuvenate and create a new one. I think drones are very, very underrated in terms of what they’re going to do.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:15:00 UTC

  • It’s not that americans are necessarily dumber than europeans, but that they’re

    It’s not that americans are necessarily dumber than europeans, but that they’re worse educated, indisciplined, overconfident, and overzealous.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:07:00 UTC