Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31563963_10156323416332264_74497462

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31563963_10156323416332264_744974623090671616_o_10156323416322264.jpg WHAT DOES SJW “EQUITY” MEAN?

    It means they are rebelling against everyone else for their low sexual, social, economic, and political market value, because of their genetic, behavioral, and aesthetic inferiority.

    That’s actually the reason.

    They want equality of outcome, but they mean, literally changing their social status from undesirable to desirable.Colin EverettI stopped being a leftist the instant I stopped viewing myself as being in the bottom 50% and started viewing myself as being in the top 50%.Apr 30, 2018 7:59pmWHAT DOES SJW “EQUITY” MEAN?

    It means they are rebelling against everyone else for their low sexual, social, economic, and political market value, because of their genetic, behavioral, and aesthetic inferiority.

    That’s actually the reason.

    They want equality of outcome, but they mean, literally changing their social status from undesirable to desirable.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 19:56:00 UTC

  • “No, I prosecute disapproval, ridicule, shaming, gossiping and rallying as an in

    —“No, I prosecute disapproval, ridicule, shaming, gossiping and rallying as an infantile substitute for argument – it just so happens that (as you demonstrate) women have a far higher proclivity for emoting rather than debating. Which is why women have the deserved reputation for resorting to instinctual disapproval as if their approval mattered, rather than doing the work of reason to produce truth and truth alone, regardless of their approval or disapproval – which likewise dominates male discourse. Much to the frustration of feminists everywhere who desperately try create pseudosciences and excuses for justifying worthless opinion over valuable argument.”—

    CENSORED ON QUORA

    Science is apparently suppressed.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 19:50:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIANISM FAILS BUT SOVEREIGNTY DOESN’T —“How does libertarian/anarcho ca

    LIBERTARIANISM FAILS BUT SOVEREIGNTY DOESN’T

    —“How does libertarian/anarcho capitalism and aim to prevent company cooperation? If four health companies decided that they would hike prices and violently attack competition, what would stop them? They are health companies so can’t be boycotted.”—- Quora User

    Well, let’s keep in mind that Libertarianism is just Pilpul (Sophistry) for the suggestible but morally disposed. And so we can’t take anything Mises, Rothbard, or Hoppe or their anglo equivalents very seriously. While their work has grains of truth here and there, it’s only to obscure it’s falsehoods, deceptions, impossibilities and malincentives.

    Instead, if we simply look at western SOVEREIGNTY meaning RULE OF LAW, under RULE OF LAW of Torts, we individually own some things, familially own others, privately organize to own others, and publicly organize to own others. The only open community property we can seize is the opportunity created by the vast decrease in opportunity cost created by our the combination of our proximity and demand for reciprocity.

    So that without the state to interfere by providing license (privileges) to families, individuals, organizations, corporations of all kinds, then individuals and groups could bring suits in courts against violations of reciprocity (natural law) in any of those forms of property.

    As such while governments originally provided limited liability insurance that limited liability to the money invested in the corporation, they also granted all sorts of privileges by denying individuals and groups the right to sue private and public organizations for personal, private, and public property violations in the markets for goods, services, and information.

    So there is no reason you couldn’t organize a group of people to produce a ‘class action’ against a polluter, or a market manipulator under Rule of Law.

    The fact that you can’t today, means that we do not live under rule of law, but rule by legislation.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 19:41:00 UTC

  • STARBUCKS EXCLUDES THE ADL FROM SENSITIVITY EDUCATION (oh, the irony)

    STARBUCKS EXCLUDES THE ADL FROM SENSITIVITY EDUCATION

    (oh, the irony)

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/30/starbucks-adl-black-jewish-activists-511390

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 19:13:00 UTC

  • “A man may not prosecute a woman, and a woman may not prosecute a man.”

    “A man may not prosecute a woman, and a woman may not prosecute a man.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 19:12:00 UTC

  • My sister is more stoic, disciplined, and tough than 90% of the men I know. Wome

    My sister is more stoic, disciplined, and tough than 90% of the men I know. Women are capable of agency. I’m not sure they’re capable of politics and war, but agency – too many of them show that it’s a problem of training not of ability.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 18:50:00 UTC

  • “Who are you to…..!!!!!”— (sarcasm) Well, domesticated animals lack the agen

    —“Who are you to…..!!!!!”—

    (sarcasm)

    Well, domesticated animals lack the agency for self determination, and people below the threshold of reason and reciprocity, are just domesticated animals. Or as Heinlein said: “If you can’t do math you’re just an animal that’s house-trained and doesn’t need to turn around three times before laying down.” So I don’t grant sovereignty to those lacking agency, because they are incapable of it, any more than I let children run with scissors or women talk politics and war.

    lol

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 18:48:00 UTC

  • Now, I’m all for regime change in iran and the gradual rescue of our persian cou

    Now, I’m all for regime change in iran and the gradual rescue of our persian cousins from the arab conquest. And a non-nuclear, and militarily limited iran as the center of the northern states is ok. A nuclear and armed iran as that center isn’t tolerable.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 18:35:00 UTC

  • WOMEN’S MURDERING OF THEIR CHILDREN IS MORE COMMON THEN MEN MURDERING THEIR ENEM

    WOMEN’S MURDERING OF THEIR CHILDREN IS MORE COMMON THEN MEN MURDERING THEIR ENEMIES

    I suppose I could estimate the stats, but I’m pretty sure there is an even balance between the number of men killed by violence, and the number of children killed by their mothers. There are very good reasons women are treated as dangerous throughout all of history,and it was only the victorians and romanticists that changed that in order to encourage the barbarians to behave once let loose in society by the industrial revolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 18:28:00 UTC

  • ( Many times, as a young boy, I stood there, quietly, at night, in the dark, bre

    ( Many times, as a young boy, I stood there, quietly, at night, in the dark, breathing slowly, deeply, and carefully, over my sleeping father, with a knife in my hands, thinking how badly he needed to die – to stop his violence against us; but that I didn’t know what would happen to my mother and sisters afterward. And that uncertainty is the only reason I let him live. I am not afraid of death and never have been. I’m not afraid of killing and never have been. However, the cost is very high to those around you. And I have had my life’s mission to fulfill. And while there are many people who might need killing, the vast majority of them are simply too broken, stupid, and ignorant to know better. And hurting them is too much like cruelty, or cruelty to animals – which I can’t bear. It’s the people who self righteously, from positions of power, or greed, or envy that do need killing – not the idiot that simply needs to be treated as the domesticated animal he is – and kept from harming himself and others. It’s the lie that we are equal and these people don’t need such constraints and the lie that killing is evil when we punish the wicked that’s the source of our problems – christianity has been a disaster – hanging is far more successful than imprisonment. Either every man is a sheriff, and we are all brothers in arms, and we take responsibility for the extremely incompetent, the criminal, and the extremely unjust, or we are serfs, slaves, and prisoners of both the high and the low – for no other reason other than our lack of will. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 17:32:00 UTC