Source: Facebook

  • (Recorded a great podcast with Claire Khaw today. Had a blast. Smart lady.)

    (Recorded a great podcast with Claire Khaw today. Had a blast. Smart lady.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 10:56:00 UTC

  • THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IS A GOOD THING. —“What’s wrong with the milit

    THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IS A GOOD THING.

    —“What’s wrong with the military industrial complex?”—Steve Pender (rhetorical question)

    Nothing. At it’s very worst it is: (a) the optimum research and development investment, and (b) the optimum means of economic redistribution, (c) the optimum means of producing male investment in the social order, (d) the optimum means of producing male prosociality.

    (Besides we replaced it with the Cathedral complex and that’s the worst possible of each.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 10:52:00 UTC

  • The empirical revolution, and its counter-revolution “the enlightenment”: the in

    The empirical revolution, and its counter-revolution “the enlightenment”: the international attempt to restate local custom in local categories, relations, operations and values, other than deflationary empirical prose – because otherwise the extant order would not withstand such scrutiny.

    But that counter-revolution came from the most backwardly governed country in europe by a man of profoundly low (libertine) character who presumed an idyllic fictional (feminine actually) nature of mankind. A wish not a truth.

    Man is neither moral nor immoral, but amoral. It is just nearly always more rewarding to act morally – at least over any period of time.

    One cannot be philosophically literate without knowledge of economics (incentives) precisely for this reason: man’s amoralism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 08:48:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEBATE, NEGOTIATION, AND PROSECUTION SERIES: Intelligible

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEBATE, NEGOTIATION, AND PROSECUTION

    SERIES: Intelligible > imaginable(believable) > reasonable > rational > justificationary > logical > calculable > tautological.

    1) On can rely on intuitionism and start with reason in order to construct calculation, or one can start with logic explain calculation (transformation of inputs into outputs), and devolve calculation into increasingly incommensurable (deflated, inflated, conflated, fictionalized) categories, until we define the unintelligible.

    2) We can start optimistically with an attempt at negotiation and therefore cooperation, leaving open one’s choice of preference, or we can start pessimistically with prosecution and therefore and therefore a threat, leaving decidability (Truth) as the only means of escape.

    3) In the market and in philosophy we can choose, in law and the court we cannot, because if you cannot testify to it – which is what empiricism is reducible to – you cannot defend yourself from prosecution with it.

    So as I write natural law, I don’t negotiate, I prosecute.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 08:40:00 UTC

  • 1) Every definition of capitalism vs socialism that I know of, and as far as I k

    1) Every definition of capitalism vs socialism that I know of, and as far as I know, the very definition of the terms, is that of ownership. So as we say ‘word games’ are just that, and nothing more.

    2) interest is necessary for the purpose of intertemporal measurement of theories of production distribution and trade. It is possible to argue that under fiat currency interest on consumption does not fulfill this function, and that we should, if possible, seek to eliminate interest on end point (consumer) consumption. However without interest we cannot know if we created or destroyed capital (time).

    3) Marxists are wrong with the labor theory of value – labor (transformation) is effectively valueless, and it is the organization of production with or without labor that provides the multiples, and only voluntary exchange in the market that determines whether such hypothesized value was created..

    4) Socialist are wrong that (a) competitive production distribution and trade can be organized such that it supports any given scheme of production, (b) that people will do more than devote the minimum time and effort to production distribution and trade (c) that black markets will replace bad decisions, (d) that corruption is a given and funded by socialist means of production, (e) that any and all such attempts must of logical necessity fail.

    5) Social democrats have finally realized that the result of their organizations is the loss of intertemporal incentive and therefore population necessary to preserve intertemporal transfers.

    6) Keynesians have finally realized that their inflation effectively loses all productivity gains, and that the austrian predictions were correct that each attempt to suppress a correction only exacerbates the consequent corrections.

    7) All monetarists have learned that the presumption of an infinite ability to inflate and therefore eliminate debt is only as true as trading partners tolerance for the calculability of contracts, and the predictability of networks of sustainable specialization and trade.

    So, you know, I consider pretty much everyone an idiot at this point and that while we can cheat a little here and there because of the vast amount of noise in any economy, the logic of economics is pretty obvious.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 02:18:00 UTC

  • The reason to lead is because everyone else is even worse. Not because you want

    The reason to lead is because everyone else is even worse. Not because you want to – but because you must.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 00:13:00 UTC

  • a band becomes a militia, a militia an army, an army a nation

    a band becomes a militia, a militia an army, an army a nation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 21:36:00 UTC

  • i like intj’s in charge. i’m happy to play merlin for an arthur

    i like intj’s in charge. i’m happy to play merlin for an arthur….


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 20:56:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 20:41:00 UTC

  • via Steve Pender “Japan is an Island. It has NO mass migration or freedom of mov

    via Steve Pender

    “Japan is an Island. It has NO mass migration or freedom of movement policy. It is a top 10 world economy. It trains and educates its own young to work instead of importing cheap labour. Be like Japan not a dinosaur like the soviet EU”-Jason O


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 19:55:00 UTC