Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • “Natural Law Fundamentalism”– Well, don’t be an idiot. Of COURSE that’s what I’

    —“Natural Law Fundamentalism”–

    Well, don’t be an idiot.

    Of COURSE that’s what I’m doing.

    The most intolerant wins.

    And Truth is the most intolerant of all.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 18:52:00 UTC

  • “Vlad did everything right.”

    “Vlad did everything right.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 18:46:00 UTC

  • “Water, Power, and Wire, Fuel, Molotov, and Fire, Noose, Pike, and Pyre.”

    “Water, Power, and Wire,

    Fuel, Molotov, and Fire,

    Noose, Pike, and Pyre.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 18:46:00 UTC

  • THE IMPORTANCE OF THE GRAMMARS I’ve been fussing over the grammars for a few wee

    THE IMPORTANCE OF THE GRAMMARS

    I’ve been fussing over the grammars for a few weeks, and it’s occurred to me that this idea is as important as testimonialism, because it provides a means of comprehending the very great difference between reasoning and calculating.

    So, while I sort of treated it as ‘groundwork’ for testimonialism, I think I’m going to lift it up to it’s own subject under or epistemology.

    My intuition was to move it under Vitruvianism in metaphysics because it’s a system of measurement of sorts and the discussion naturally flows from one idea to the next.

    We’ll see.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 17:51:00 UTC

  • You know there are just enough morons crawling out of the woodwork to make you l

    You know there are just enough morons crawling out of the woodwork to make you lose your faith in humanity. Well, actually there are a perpetual series of tidal waves of them, and it’s really hard to get out of the way….

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 13:11:00 UTC

  • by Bill Joslin 1 – God exists through the belief of humans and can be measured b

    by Bill Joslin

    1 – God exists through the belief of humans and can be measured by the actions of believers.

    2 – We create God and make God real through our actions.

    3 – We can testify to this truthfully.

    Opposed to:

    1 – God create everything, everything indicates God’s existence.

    The later equates to a metaphysical lie.

    So, if you can have your God without lies.

    Why lie?

    To secure a monopoly on the authority of truth over reality itself.

    To secure opportunity via theft

    No more lies

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 11:28:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 11:05:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32385097_10156352923387264_73020638

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32385097_10156352923387264_7302063862038134784_n_10156352923382264.jpg JANUS MASK

    Past (via-negativa),

    Present (via-reciprocity),

    and Future (via-positiva).Brendan HegartyLu also sports this look in Gaul sometimes… IDK why though? Gauls didnt like to write things.May 13, 2018 10:58amBrendan HegartyMay 13, 2018 10:59amCurt Doolittlea lot of cultures valued memorization as a selection criteria and those who made livings on memories had no incentive for writing.May 13, 2018 10:59amBrendan HegartyMy IDK was for his tricephale not the non writingsMay 13, 2018 11:00amCurt DoolittleTaxation made writing necessary because the data was too irregular, and beyond our ability to recall.May 13, 2018 11:00amCurt DoolittleUm, don’t know the era of that illustration. Janus’ origins are not known, but the idea and name appear to have been IE, even if the god itself was a roman invention.May 13, 2018 11:02amBrendan Hegarty”Bas-relief discovered in Paris in 1867 and preserved at the Carnavalet Museum, from J.-L. Courcelle-Seneuil, Les Dieux gaulois d’après les monuments figurés (The Gallic Gods According to the Figurative Monuments), Paris, 1910.

    “May 13, 2018 11:04amCurt Doolittle—“Rübekeil[28] suggests that Lugus was a triune god, comprising Esus, Toutatis and Taranis, the three chief deities mentioned by Lucan (who, at the same time, makes no mention of Lugus), and that pre-Proto-Germanic tribes in contact with the Celts (possibly the Chatti) moulded aspects of Lugus into the Germanic god Wōdanaz i.e. that Gaulish Mercury gave rise to Germanic Mercury.”—

    Now, that makes sense.May 13, 2018 11:09amCurt Doolittlethe three faces is cool, but the three penises …. I’m thinking how fun a triple orgasm would be….May 13, 2018 11:09amBrendan Hegartylolz Celtic mythology seems sometimes as the most disorganized thing on earth I swearMay 13, 2018 11:11amCurt Doolittleit’s because it was more like folk tales to them than religion.May 13, 2018 11:12amBrendan HegartyThere was never a Homer for them I suppose to organize them into something coherent.May 13, 2018 11:13amCharlton WardI’ve seen a few that only have two faces, only future and past. From the Romans

    First thing I thought when I saw this was “holy trinity/christianity”May 13, 2018 11:17amBill JoslinI’d challenge the last point.

    There are ancient arguments against the adoption of writting. It boils down to: writting loses the transfer of context when passed down through the generations. This opens up misunderstanding and error.

    Druids refused to write down their knowledge (which was apparently as sophisticated as the romans as per Areilius) for this very reason. Simply put- we don’t really know what they knew.

    Crushing the Celts (in all forms) by Rome might have more to do with crushing an upcoming civilizational competitor rather than stamping out a barbaric nuisanceMay 13, 2018 11:21amCurt Doolittle^of course it did.May 13, 2018 11:25amAloysius AugustusRECIPROCITY. ❤️May 13, 2018 11:35amNicholas SmithReminds me of the Slavic three face godMay 13, 2018 1:08pmCurt DoolittleyepMay 13, 2018 1:09pmYiannis KontinopoulosVia negativa – NAP

    Reciprocity – Mindfulness

    Positiva – VirtueMay 13, 2018 1:26pmCurt Doolittlenap is bullshit, but non imposition will do. that’s what you’re looking for. Otherwise that’s pretty good.May 13, 2018 2:06pmYiannis KontinopoulosHey Curt, thanks. Can you please link me to somewhere where you discuss on non-imposition per se so I can read into it?May 13, 2018 2:11pmCurt Doolittlehttps://propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/May 13, 2018 2:17pmToby MckinnonIs Propertarianism the path to the underverse? N E C R O M O N G E RMay 13, 2018 7:07pmCurt Doolittledon’t get me sexually excited… lolMay 13, 2018 7:12pmYiannis KontinopoulosMuch appreciated!May 13, 2018 7:26pmFawzi M. ChalaFunny you mentioned Janus . every time i bump into the liars/two timers that i know i call them son/daughter of janusMay 13, 2018 8:30pmJesse Schultzcool anus maskMay 13, 2018 10:15pmBill JoslinIsn’t this the mask from the movie Riddick?May 13, 2018 10:23pmBill JoslinMay 13, 2018 10:24pmHelga OdalThis can still be a day of days..May 16, 2018 12:21amJANUS MASK

    Past (via-negativa),

    Present (via-reciprocity),

    and Future (via-positiva).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 10:51:00 UTC

  • In any dispute between to testimonies regarding the same phenomenon, we have two

    In any dispute between to testimonies regarding the same phenomenon, we have two tests of decidability:

    1- Rationality (incentives)

    2 – Parsimony (occam’s razor)

    If the incentive exist to fictionalize, and if fictionalism is defeated by parsimony, then the person is in fact lying.

    The only time to use a god is via positiva (poetic meaning and communication) but it cannot be used via negativa (truth or argument).

    The reason gods were necessary is intergenerational transfer. if gods were mortal they could not explain the long standing.

    A god is just a unit of measure of the intertemporal.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 10:41:00 UTC

  • “A thought: this want of a pack leader; Do you think it is forever changing? At

    —“A thought: this want of a pack leader; Do you think it is forever changing? At first thought it would be a projection onto another, for whatever the reasons, then once one has acquired or matured those parts within themselves to a point they no longer need that leader, they move onto the next and repeat. Do you feel a link between internal maturation of the organism and projection onto another?”— Scott Claremont

    Scott,

    I’m not exactly sure what you are trying to say but if I’m guessing correctly, then yes, it’s forever changing both at the macro (group) and personal(individual) level, and that’s the evidence anyway if we look across time.

    I usually use the example of ethics:

    > infantile(selfish) > heroic(imitative), virtue(character) > rule (law, norm > discipline-rules) > and outcome.

    And that our ‘gods’ mature just like our ethics.

    But what does that mean for education, commons production, and justice (law)?

    I mean, if we acknowledge the needs of men we supply them with what they need to transition (mature), until that point they no longer can.

    How do we stop the propagation of falsehoods while preserving the utility of parable?

    How do we fulfill the pack leader demand, while not creating falsehoods?

    So far I can’t get past the homogenous polity and the king/emperor as pack leader. The universe as ‘divine order’ without divinity. And man’s purpose to become the universe’s gods.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 10:23:00 UTC