Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 06:18:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
The American electoral system makes us vote given our responsibility for the com
The American electoral system makes us vote given our responsibility for the commons. If we restored property it would fix most. if we restored male head of household it would restore all.
once you start thinking the equilibrium between density and the discount on opportunity, versus sparsity, and the premium on the commons, you understand that value judgements of the urban vs suburban, vs rural people.
The lower density the more responsibility for commons and the more costly are oppportunities. Whereas the higher density the lower responsbility for commons and the lower cost of opportunities.
Hence why density determines value judgements regarding the private and common.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 22:35:00 UTC
-
“If you aren’t willing to die for freedom you’re already a slave”— Kevin Rucku
—“If you aren’t willing to die for freedom you’re already a slave”— Kevin Ruckus
(I’d use sovereignty instead of freedom or liberty but the sentiment is the same 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 22:16:00 UTC
-
“CURT, ON IRELAND’S REFERENDUM. YOUR POSITION ON ABORTION?”— Well, you know, I
—“CURT, ON IRELAND’S REFERENDUM. YOUR POSITION ON ABORTION?”—
Well, you know, I would have said something very different before I worked on natural law, because my intuitions are pretty libertarian. But now that I have, I’m against abortion, pro birth control, pro enforced birth control, and pro sterilization. And I would rather see punishment of girls who get pregnant, and the boys that get them pregnant, than tolerate abortions – even if the data says that unwanted children produce extraordinarily bad externalities. Altruistic punishment of those who fail to suppress their impulses a good thing. Fear of failure to suppress your impulses is a good thing. Having been there myself I understand. I also understand that the option only subsidizes the problem And even though I hate the idea myself, like capital punishment some unpleasantries are what they are. Some things are not to be trifled with, and creating life is one of them. And decidable is decidable, and it’s when we lie to ourselves and each other, that we have difficulty solving problems that are in fact, always decidable. Abortion is decidable. The decision is ‘no’.
.
(I didn’t want to publish this, but … it’s my job, so I did.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 22:04:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 19:44:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 19:40:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 15:22:00 UTC
-
NEW WORLD ORDER: THE FIRST STEP WAS TO KILL THE KINGS New World Order = Rule by
NEW WORLD ORDER: THE FIRST STEP WAS TO KILL THE KINGS
New World Order = Rule by Merchants.
by Bill Anderson
The first step was to kill all the kings. Completed via WWII. The king is the Father of the Nation, biologically related to his subjects, the embodiment of the genetic self-interest of a nation.
The moderns are very careful to propagandize monarchy as evil and wicked, because the king has the incentive to limit the opportunities of the merchant class to profit from the consumption of capital of the nation.
The Merchants frame the story of America as the culmination of the defeat of kings, raising anti-monarchy to religious fervor, and sacralizing the value. Monarchy is a heresy to them. This value system led America to become the Kingslayer and kinslayer in both WWI and WWII. Little did we know that when we slew the Fathers of the nations, that we were killing our Father in our collective cultural psyche, rendering a final judgement against authoritarianism as evil, and enshrining that value system. It’s the value system of the Son in rebellion against the Father.
Now we see this anti-Father value system reaching the flower of its expression : where all masculinity is toxic, where men no longer defend their borders or their breeding rights.
The restoration of Men, of patriarchy (rule by fathers), requires the re-sacrilization of the Father in our value system. This requires the destruction of the mythos of the merchants, including the propaganda that the American project was noble or virtuous only because it destroyed kings. The was virtue in being explorers and conquerors, but not in leading the charge to institute rule by merchant.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 14:38:00 UTC
-
The vast majority of us would have little need for philosophy if we started work
The vast majority of us would have little need for philosophy if we started working prior to adolescence. It’s the institutionalized infantilism of mandatory but largely useless education after grade six, that forces us to grasp at rhetorical straws out of sequestration, ignorance, and propaganda.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 14:38:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32624876_10156355769522264_42944547
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32624876_10156355769522264_4294454773257601024_n_10156355769517264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32479841_10156355784962264_123486034951405568_n_10156355784957264.jpg WE CAN”T GET OUT OF IT. PEOPLE AT THE BOTTOM WILL INCREASE DRAG
the OECD also highlights a decoupling between productivity growth and higher real average wages in many countries, resulting in continued declines in labour’s share of national income.
In turn, the Compendium shows that the contribution of labour utilisation (hours worked per capita) to GDP growth has risen markedly in a number of countries, notably in the United Kingdom and the United States.
However, rises in labour utilisation reflect two opposing effects: higher employment rates but lower average hours per worker, which points to more part-time working, often in low productivity jobs.
Higher employment rates are welcome. But the fact that they, rather than increases in labour productivity, have been the most important driver of GDP per capita growth in many economies in recent years is a concern for long-term economic prospects, it adds.
The OECD says productivity is ultimately a question of “working smarter” – measured by ‘multifactor productivity’ – rather than “working harder”. It reflects firms’ ability to produce more output by better combining inputs through new ideas, technological innovations, as well as by way of process and organisational innovations, such as new business models.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 14:23:00 UTC