Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • YES, WHITE SHARIA IS A JOKE, BUT WE DON’T HAVE AN EQUIVALENT. —“White Sharia m

    YES, WHITE SHARIA IS A JOKE, BUT WE DON’T HAVE AN EQUIVALENT.

    —“White Sharia makes me laugh with some truth-like connections, but then cringe if it’s meant seriously. We’re better than that.”—Bryan Nova Brey

    Of course we’re better than that, because natural law is (a) scientific, (b) constantly evolving and adapting, (c) innovative, eugenic and transcendent.

    Sharia is none of those things. It’s supernatural, fixed, ignorance-creating, developmentally inhibitory, dysgenic, and devolutionary.

    That said, we don’t have an equivalent term for Zero Tolerance Law Every Man Must Enforce.

    I use Natural Law, The Oath, and Every Man A Sheriff. But the general idea that every member of a civilization must adhere to a law, an oath, and the duty to defend both, doesn’t have a name in western civilization precisely because prior to the present we had no idea *any alternative existed*.

    —“Sharia is the Bedouin equivalent of the Talmud.”—Howard Van Der Klauw

    And Natural Law, The Oath and Every Man A Sheriff and a Warrior, is the equivalent of those laws. The problem is, truth science evolves, our literature covers every discipline, and all must survive competition from one another – and theirs don’t. They are monopolies not markets.

    —“It’s a joke. But, White Sharia will be an even funnier joke once there are no more Muslims.”–Eli Harman

    Um… Eli is always on message. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 19:35:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW ON MISCEGENATION (this oughtta get me in trouble) —“Hi Curt … Re

    NATURAL LAW ON MISCEGENATION

    (this oughtta get me in trouble)

    —“Hi Curt … Regarding your post on natural law being sharia for whites … what would be the logical stance of natural law toward a nordic woman from Minnesota with a 125 IQ marrying an 85-IQ immigrant from Somalia? Would the negative externalities need to be incorporated into a natural law approach to this?”— A Friend

    Well first, putting aside that this example violates near universal demonstration of female hypergamy. But it does happen.

    Second, some group may choose NOT to invest in and insure their genetic commons, and some group might choose to invest in and insure their genetic commons. The longer term question of whether the dysgenic and the eugenic polities will eventually end up in conflict is a practical rather than legal question.

    Natural Law says only that we may not impose costs upon the investments others – particularly those that they choose to defend. So if you moved to a polity that didn’t insure the genetics of the group over the desires of the individual, then it’s not a violation. If instead you attempt to impose costs upon a group that insures the genetic commons of the group, then that’s a violation.

    I would say that it’s cause for exit or removal because (a) one cannot perform restitution for genetic dilution(pollution), and (b) one cannot perform restitution for the externalities created – all of which are bad. In fact, genetic disinformation (pollution) is perhaps the worst possible crime with the longest consequences. More so than murder.

    So the only form of restitution for those impositions of costs upon the genetic, cultural, and normative commons, is voluntary exist or forcible removal.

    My view is that reproduction under 92 should be prohibited, and under 100 limited to one child. (using current distribution numbers, where 106 is the ‘minimum median’).

    This is the only way reproduction is not damaging to the genetic commons for those groups that want to invest in the genetic commons, and pay the cost of insuring that commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 19:17:00 UTC

  • “Saw you in … “— ( Actually my phenotype (appearance) is fairly common in no

    —“Saw you in … “—

    ( Actually my phenotype (appearance) is fairly common in north and east France near the German border, and I have plenty of doppelgangers – most of whom are a bit taller than I am. one musician in Texas in particular. People used to send me pictures of ‘sightings’ when I was younger. Most people don’t travel enough to europe to see the remnants of our tribes.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 19:10:00 UTC

  • “I’m living this truth here in Brazil right now. They’ve managed to disarm the p

    —“I’m living this truth here in Brazil right now. They’ve managed to disarm the population 20 years ago. Now criminals are murdering everyone else to protect their right to bear arms. 60.000 people die per year in the process.”— Rodrigo Yoshima

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 19:00:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW ON KILLING —“Punishment for killing someone does not necessarily i

    NATURAL LAW ON KILLING

    —“Punishment for killing someone does not necessarily imply they had any actual value . At the societal level the punishment is automatic.”— Edgar Braintree

    They are not punishing you for killing the individual, but for not getting sanction from others before doing so. In other words, they are punishing you for hubris.

    Getting a dozen men (jury) together to hang someone from a tree is very different from killing someone vengefully. If death is sanctioned then appeal exists, hubris, and error limited. What we seek to limit is unsanctioned deaths, without appeal, insured against hubris, and error.

    If you act without sanction you are a risk to the group. If you act with sanction you reduce group risk.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:57:00 UTC

  • “Intolerance is the most masculine virtue one can have.”—Bashar Al Stedman (ev

    —“Intolerance is the most masculine virtue one can have.”—Bashar Al Stedman

    (every man a sheriff)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:52:00 UTC

  • SUCKERS (People are such suckers. All advertising is good advertising. All menti

    SUCKERS

    (People are such suckers. All advertising is good advertising. All mention is free advertising. All emotive mention better advertising. All notoriety is the best advertising. If you want to be discussed, then create controversy. Putting a quarter in the meme machine is the cheapest advertising of all. People can’t stop themselves. It’s hysterical. It’s like having an army of idiot savant pets working for you. I mean, the only thing that amazes me any longer is the stupidity of the gossiping classes. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:50:00 UTC

  • VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTORS Don’t kid your self. Investors matter. Investor person

    VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTORS

    Don’t kid your self. Investors matter. Investor personality matters more. Investor strategy regarding exit matters more. Investor’s funding source stability more so. They will always think they are smarter than you are for the simple reason that they have to. They aren’t. They are however, better at insuring you against failure. The simple act of keeping them informed so that they know your progress, while performing such that they don’t feel the need to ‘interfere’ is the way to use their insurance value to insure you maintain the right behavior. In every company I’ve NOT bought the central problem has been trying to expand too early so that the hard work of interacting with customers is offloaded so that the team can ‘masturbate’ by working internally rather than working with customers and constantly adapting the organization to those customers. In every company I have bought, the opposite is true: they are constantly focused on customers and they real problem is that they underinvest in sales and marketing.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:31:00 UTC

  • “Never appease Marxists, it only whets their appetite.”— Edward Townes

    —“Never appease Marxists, it only whets their appetite.”— Edward Townes

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:13:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS OF COUSIN MARRIAGE (summary: IT”S REALLY BAD)

    https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2018/05/economics-cousin-marriage.htmlTHE ECONOMICS OF COUSIN MARRIAGE

    (summary: IT”S REALLY BAD)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 13:37:00 UTC