Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 07:55:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
RULE IS THE MOST PROFITABLE INDUSTRY Let’s Return To Our Original Occupation
RULE IS THE MOST PROFITABLE INDUSTRY
Let’s Return To Our Original Occupation
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 07:54:00 UTC
-
WARS ARE FOR PROFIT ADVENTURES Venture Capitalism At It’s Finest
WARS ARE FOR PROFIT ADVENTURES
Venture Capitalism At It’s Finest.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 07:53:00 UTC
-
OMG. FAN HUMOR. AWESOME. LOLZ
OMG. FAN HUMOR. AWESOME. LOLZ
https://www.facebook.com/100010520417439/videos/592131091147566/
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 07:51:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 23:28:00 UTC
-
I’ve addressed why some people need drugs, alcohol, the new age, occult, religio
I’ve addressed why some people need drugs, alcohol, the new age, occult, religion, the fictionalisms, and why others do not. Its not that I don’t understand these needs. i understand why most women lack agency, and some men lack agency, an how these physical and emotional devices provide self medication for that lack of agency, under socialization, or low sexual, social, and economic market value. its just that they are irrelevant to decidability under law, just as they are to any other science.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 20:27:00 UTC
-
GOD WAS ENTHUSIASTIC WITH HIS MORON WAND (Modern Warfare Generations) The idea t
GOD WAS ENTHUSIASTIC WITH HIS MORON WAND
(Modern Warfare Generations)
The idea that governments are uniquely able to start fight and finish wars is a product of the treaty of Westphalia. This ‘irregularity’ of western civilization survived long enough that the average idiot can’t… https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/1015638886
—“This is a pretty gross misreading of history.”— Ed Rotski
That’s not an argument. Make one.
“Modern War begins after Westphalia.”
“Westphalia Gave The State A Monopoly on War.”
“Through all of history families, clans, cities, ethnic groups, religions, private companies (conquest of india) … fought wars.”
“The Church lost it’s ability to conduct warfare in Europe”
—“1. Treaty of Westphalia is hardly unique.
2. The whole arc of state building in the middle ages was to arrogate war making to the central government, that is, to abolish private war. That process was largely done by turn of the 16th century.”—- Ed Rotski
—-“Whoever told you modern war starts with Westphalia is just wrong.”— Ed Rotski
I will let you argue with William Lind, and every other military historian. Rather than waste my time with someone lacking basic knowledge of the generations of modern warfare and their beginnings in the 1640’s.
—“Really? Talk to Delbruck, or Kauper, or Lynn, Potter, Wilson, Weigley, Dodge, Duffy, Chandler, Nosworthy, or even Comines. Your assertions are not just bad, they’re “the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor” bad. You are hideously ignorant.”—-
1) OK. Game on. It’ll be good education for the audience. Here is the Generations of Warfare definition I made use of.
2) Delbruck defines ‘modern’ as beginning with the italian renaissance. Kaeuper is a medievalist and I don’t know how he defines ‘modern’. …
3) As far as I know Lynn defines modern as 1650 – the end of ‘pillaging’. So he agrees. Potter doesn’t make a distinction that I know of and I don’t know why you’d include him. Same with Wilson unless you’re referring to someone other than the Tower collection historian.
4) Same for Nosworthy? Are you just spamming names?
5) And Why not Lind, Keegan, or Van Creveld? Why aren’t they in your list?
6) Just search for “Generations of Warfare”.
7) And how does any author you listed have anything to do with my OP and its argument? How does it have anything to do with 4/5gw and the return of non-state actors? What rock do you live under?
8) an endless stream of morons waste my time.
—“Modern warfare doesn’t start until nation in arms and mass conscription, and the final adoption of the modern organizations, battalion, brigade, division, corps. That is so clear. And Lynn is wrong if he thinks people stopped pillaging in the 1650s.”— Ed Rotski
OMFG. Look, do you know how many historical models and cycles have been proposed? You can make any distinction yuo want. However, the one that I referred to was the one that every theorist I know and every other think tank I know of, uses.
So between your …. ‘opinion’. Your ‘straw men’ list, and the fact that the only person on your list who said anything close agrees with 1650, and that I pointed to a reference for an index of generations that gets 36M google hits, I”m gonna cast you as a basement dwelling loon.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 19:39:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/33986798_10156389112982264_81620581
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/33986798_10156389112982264_8162058147402350592_n_10156389112977264.jpg WHAT FAMOUS PERSON DOES THIS FACE BELONG TO?
(It’s someone you probably know)James Cohenmediterranean phrenologyMay 29, 2018 6:22pmSG SimmonsI feel like I know this one but am having troubleMay 29, 2018 6:22pmJames Cohennikola tesla?May 29, 2018 6:23pmDavid ShieldsRecently living or long dead?May 29, 2018 6:23pmPaul Nunezpeter cushingMay 29, 2018 6:24pmRuth StathamI was thinking him too.May 29, 2018 6:24pmCJ VandalTesla’s death mask, age 86.May 29, 2018 6:24pmMichael D. AbbottTesla.May 29, 2018 6:24pmKaiser SchimdtMike Enoch of The Daily ShoahMay 29, 2018 6:25pmSG Simmonswow, nothing like I pictured though
amazing what hair does lolMay 29, 2018 6:25pmLouis Van BoydJulius Caesar?May 29, 2018 6:28pmJoseph HowellEmbarrassed to Harry Potter post but that looks a lot like VoldemortMay 29, 2018 6:28pmKaiser SchimdtEmbarrassed to Harry Potter post but Voldemort didn’t have a noseMay 29, 2018 6:30pmTaylor RaggGrand Moff TarkinMay 29, 2018 6:30pmGregory GichevNosferatu?May 29, 2018 6:30pmSteve PenderTesla?May 29, 2018 6:30pmDavid PhelpsEyes too far apart.May 29, 2018 6:30pmJoseph HowellDaaaaammn you’re right.May 29, 2018 6:30pmJoseph HowellSo it’s def not “he who should not be named”May 29, 2018 6:31pmTyler Lee@[100012997380601:2048:SG Simmons]May 29, 2018 6:32pmTravis CooneyIt’s teslaMay 29, 2018 6:34pmMichael ChurchillThe English dude who played the butler in “Arthur.”May 29, 2018 6:37pmAndrei VamenscuEverytime I look at this I keep wanting to say GoebbelsMay 29, 2018 6:39pmDaniel Roland AndersonGoogle “Nikola Tesla death mask”
https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/images/tesla-death-mask-displayed-nikola-tesla-museum-belgrade-serbiaMay 29, 2018 6:41pmCurt Doolittle( Tesla, sure, but he sure looks like Nosferatu. )May 29, 2018 6:46pmKyle BrownBelaegosiMay 29, 2018 6:52pmDaniel Roland AndersonYou mean they aren’t the same guy? Like Superman and Clark Kent.
Why don’t you go tell some little kids there’s not Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus.
Damn Curt!
Truth has no mercy, but . . . damn.May 29, 2018 6:55pmEli HarmanMy first thought was “Bertrand Russel.”May 29, 2018 6:56pmJames Cohenit’s the med skullMay 29, 2018 7:16pmJames KnowlesNosferatuMay 29, 2018 7:20pmJohn Horatio FitzgeraldFerdinand CelineMay 29, 2018 7:24pmTobias LangleyMay 29, 2018 7:26pmCJ CarverOne of the coolest incels of all time.May 29, 2018 7:35pmKyle BrownTolkeinMay 29, 2018 8:16pmColin HigginsI think that is correct. I was going to say CushingMay 29, 2018 8:16pmEric RushborisMay 29, 2018 8:17pmAnthony RodriguezThe guy who gets choked to death by Darth Vader.May 29, 2018 8:53pmLincoln ThurmanTesla.. But my first thought was DraculaMay 29, 2018 8:56pmJohn StephensI though it looks like Maynard from Tool. LOL.May 29, 2018 10:28pmJohn Horatio FitzgeraldDefinitely Celine.May 29, 2018 10:41pmJosé Francisco MayoraReinhard Heydrich…?May 29, 2018 10:57pmMatthew LindemanGovernor TarkinMay 29, 2018 11:18pmTorian BlackwellI DONT CARE! You want me to believe Cory Weiss is the devil because he looks like an evil little gremlins. I DONT. Leave my life alone.May 30, 2018 7:23amCurt DoolittleITS NICOLA TESLAMay 30, 2018 1:31pmAlex MacleodNo he had a REALLY gregarious nose.May 30, 2018 4:19pmAndrea RoyallVoldemort with noseJun 01, 2018 7:55pmAndrea RoyallHe had a shekel snozJun 01, 2018 7:57pmWHAT FAMOUS PERSON DOES THIS FACE BELONG TO?
(It’s someone you probably know)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 18:20:00 UTC
-
NOTES: Constant vs contingent vs inconsistent vs non-relations. Recursive Contin
NOTES:
Constant vs contingent vs inconsistent vs non-relations.
Recursive Continuous Disambiguation vs Scale of Set of Constant Relations(density)
Cumulation of association vs falsification of associations
Computational efficiency.
State Persistence vs breadth search, vs depth search
We cannot know the intelligence of distant ancestors.
Planning a series of steps in sequence must emerge – which requires recursion.
Consciousness must emerge, meaning, the ability to compare states.
Cooperation must emerge, meaning, the ability to empathize with intent.
At some point we must develop sufficient computational ability to manipulate our bodies in some way that allows for unambiguous communication, or a means of continuous disambiguation, that is fast enough for one another to make use of in real time, and easy enough for one another to retain.
And at some point, given sufficient computational ability, memory, and state persistence independent of recursion, language must emerge.
At some point the value of such communication much be such that the cost of it is offset by the rewards of it.
And we should see a cliff in history where there is a dramatic change when we did develop those abilities. And we do see it – rather recently.
But language requires a system of measurement. The system of measurement is limited by our senses. And as such meaning refers to a set of measurements, eventually reducible to analogies to human experience.
So while semantic content (measurements) must vary from species to species, grammar (continuous recursive disambiguation) should be universal in the sense that it varies predictably with computational abilities.
We can understand a child, a person with 60IQ, 70IQ and so on, up to 200+ IQ. But as far as I can tell the set of measurements (basis of semantics) remain the same, and all that changes is the scope of the state persisted, the depth of recursion, and the density and distance of relations, and the ability to model (forecast). In other words, simple people are in fact simply ‘more simple’ in the density of content of their semantics, use of grammar, and models (Stories) that they can construct with them.
So universal grammar as a set of computational minimums and efficiencies, should always exist, and human universal grammar as universal grammar limited to human measurements (semantics), does exist. And any organism with sufficient computational (neural) capacity, should develop some means of communication using some variation of universal grammar, and some sense-perception – action dependent semantics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 16:28:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 16:01:00 UTC