SMALL HOMOGENOUS IS BEST
1-Narrow populations can (a) correct, (b) develop neoteny (c) drift. 2-Wider populations resist correction, neoteny, and drift. 3-The optimum population size for continuous domestication of the distribution is in the hundreds of thousands to low millions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 15:07:00 UTC
Retweeted Iosif Lazaridis (@iosif_lazaridis):
“We further show that these ancient Icelanders are markedly more similar to their source populations in Scandinavia and the British-Irish Isles than to contemporary Icelanders, who have been shaped by 1100 years of extensive genetic drift. “
https://t.co/ZuWBtvHolu
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 15:02:00 UTC
via Brandon Hayes
—“It’s not that Keynesian economics is unscientific it’s that it’s immoral. It’s not so much that German Rationalism and Jewish Cosmopolitan rationalism are not simply a backwards-expression of intuitionism and operationalism under empiricism, despite it’s inability to produce insights and only explain them. It’s instead, that the rationalist position is an attempt to intellectually outlaw investigation into emergent economic phenomenon – which is the purpose of scientific investigation, just as much as experimental psychology is the discipline that investigates first principles – and which has discovered the reason for our long list of cognitive biases that produce non-rational actions not anticipated by the classical model.” – Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 14:48:00 UTC
(repost suggested by Brandon Hayes)
“[A]s far as I know, the only meaningful reason to study economics for use in ethics and politics, is to justify the rule of law (Nomocracy), under the single rule of property rights, where property rights is as defined under Propertarianism, as property-en-toto (demonstrated property). And where that body of law suppresses sufficient involuntary transfer of property-en-toto, that the formation of a Nomocratic polity is possible. And where the formation and perpetuation of that polity is possible, because transaction costs are sufficiently suppressed that a rational choice for Nomocracy is possible, over a rational choice for statism. And that the normative preference of nomocratic rule over statist rule is maintained by the constant exercise of that body of law in daily life, rather than a phillosophical-rational, religio-moral, pedagogically-instructional, or normatively-habituated means of persistence.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 12:30:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/34102811_10156392959072264_4822289134196359168_o_10156392959052264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/33994789_10156392959057264_2659727702856040448_o_10156392959047264.jpg WHY NO TRAINS IN AMERICA?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 12:28:00 UTC
Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy Enforced By The Inquisition of Natural Law.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 12:25:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/THE “BOOK” ENDING THE JEWISH AUSTRIAN (MISESIAN-ROTHBARDIAN) PSEUDOSCIENCE
This ‘article’ is 21K words, or approximately an 80 page book, on ‘Correcting’ the Misesian (Jewish) wing, of the ‘Austrian'(Mengerian) school. It ‘corrects’ Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe – and indirectly explains Hayek.
I’ve put it into book form but i can’t afford to edit it and release it because my other projects take precedence.
There are a total of 200 pages or so in the book, which includes ideas from other posts on my site. However, for the truly interested party, the entire argument is in that shorter version.
Um, in simple terms, Just as Marxism, Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, Feminism, and Postmodernism (as well as the abrahamic religions) are elaborate sophisms, Misesian Economics consist of a single valuable insight (operationalism), made useless by a sea of sophisms.
I’m aware that probably only Hoppe can debate me at this level, but someone with MA or PhD in the philosophy of science should be able to keep up. If you are deeply enough involved in libertarian theory it may help you quite a bit transition.
But remember that the reason you are susceptible to rothbardianism is that you are suggestible. There are very few of us who are not suggestible (meaning we have very high agency.)
https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:42:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/THE “BOOK” ENDING THE JEWISH AUSTRIAN (MISESIAN-ROTHBARDIAN) PSEUDOSCIENCE
This ‘article’ is 21K words, or approximately an 80 page book, on ‘Correcting’ the Misesian (Jewish) wing, of the ‘Austrian'(Mengerian) school. It ‘corrects’ Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe – and indirectly explains Hayek.
I’ve put it into book form but i can’t afford to edit it and release it because my other projects take precedence.
There are a total of 200 pages or so in the book, which includes ideas from other posts on my site. However, for the truly interested party, the entire argument is in that shorter version.
Um, in simple terms, Just as Marxism, Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, Feminism, and Postmodernism (as well as the abrahamic religions) are elaborate sophisms, Misesian Economics consist of a single valuable insight (operationalism), made useless by a sea of sophisms.
I’m aware that probably only Hoppe can debate me at this level, but someone with MA or PhD in the philosophy of science should be able to keep up. If you are deeply enough involved in libertarian theory it may help you quite a bit transition.
But remember that the reason you are susceptible to rothbardianism is that you are suggestible. There are very few of us who are not suggestible (meaning we have very high agency.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:42:00 UTC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesisThe Red Queen is the Enemy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:26:00 UTC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesisThe Red Queen is the Enemy
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:26:00 UTC