Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND MARKETS FOR SURVIVAL OF A POLITY Sovereignty

    SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND MARKETS FOR SURVIVAL OF A POLITY

    Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors.

    Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes).

    Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes).

    Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive).

    Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial).

    Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor).

    Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor).

    Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor).

    Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons.

    Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population.

    Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:59:00 UTC

  • ON “MATHINESS” IN PHYSICS ‘Mathiness’ is a f–cking pseudoscientific plague. And

    ON “MATHINESS” IN PHYSICS

    ‘Mathiness’ is a f–cking pseudoscientific plague.

    And people wonder why Hayek called the 20th century an age of mysticism, and I call it the age of pseudoscience.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathiness

    MATHINESS = SCIENTISM = PSEUDOSCIENCE = “LITERATURE”

    I think the pejorative “Scientism” refers to pseudosciences (overreach in particular), just as “Mathiness” Refers to pseudoscience (“Overreach”).

    FROM THE ARTICLE

    —“Physicists today “write a lot of papers, build a lot of [theoretical] models, hold a lot of conferences, cite each other — you have all the trappings of science,” he says. “But for me, physics is all about making successful predictions. And that’s been lacking.””—

    —“Theoretical physicists used to explain what was observed. Now they try to explain why they can’t explain what was not observed. And they’re not even good at that.”—

    THE ANSWER FROM ECONOMICS

    As far as I know the problem is (a) we have far too many unproductive academics paid to write papers rather than spending money on experiments. And (b) the low hanging fruit has been captured and we may not be able to (yet) capture and use enough energy to perform necessary experiments.

    SCIENCE IS THE DISCIPLINE OF TESTIMONY AND TESTIMONY REQUIRES OBSERVATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS REQUIRE TESTS

    Tests can be “PRE-dictive” if the production of the data is controlled, or “DE-scriptive” if the production of the data is uncontrolled.

    But if we don’t have an observation, and a system of measurement then we don’t have science.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:43:00 UTC

  • DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL I learned from this tw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1ishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1isGETTING DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL

    I learned from this two hour conversation that I can give a three hour lecture (with two long breaks) that would cover the epistemology thoroughly enough.

    Great stuff here. For the hard core guys here is pretty much the complete picture. And Eric did an amazing job of grilling me.

    ( @ Eric Orwoll )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:12:00 UTC

  • DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL I learned from this tw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1isGETTING DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL

    I learned from this two hour conversation that I can give a three hour lecture (with two long breaks) that would cover the epistemology thoroughly enough.

    Great stuff here. For the hard core guys here is pretty much the complete picture. And Eric did an amazing job of grilling me.

    ( @ @[602477171:2048:Eric Orwoll] )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:12:00 UTC

  • DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL I learned from this tw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1isGETTING DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL

    I learned from this two hour conversation that I can give a three hour lecture (with two long breaks) that would cover the epistemology thoroughly enough.

    Great stuff here. For the hard core guys here is pretty much the complete picture. And Eric did an amazing job of grilling me.

    ( @ Eric Orwoll )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:12:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://nypost.com/2017/01/14/its-time-to-face-facts-obamas-presidency-was-a-failure/http://nypost.com/2017/01/14/its-time-to-face-facts-obamas-presidency-was-a-failure/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 06:01:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://nypost.com/2017/01/14/its-time-to-face-facts-obamas-presidency-was-a-failure/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 06:01:00 UTC

  • Two hours tonight on podcast with Eric Orwoll discussing epistemology and I had

    Two hours tonight on podcast with Eric Orwoll discussing epistemology and I had a blast. I hop you will give it a listen/view when it comes out.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 21:14:00 UTC

  • ABRAHAMISM: 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdo

    ABRAHAMISM:

    1) Restatement of Myth as History

    2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law

    3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”)

    4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance.

    5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance.

    6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods.

    7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods.

    8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge.

    9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 17:57:00 UTC

  • “The dating scene in the bay area has turned me into a full on misogynist. I’ll

    —“The dating scene in the bay area has turned me into a full on misogynist. I’ll be writing my memoirs as a stunning exposè into the broken women of Western Civilization, I’m calling it “It’s Not OK Cupid”.—- A Friend

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 15:52:00 UTC