Source: Facebook

  • THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN

    THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of simply constructing only fair deals produces western civilization. And the balance of powers.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 10:03:00 UTC

  • THE RATIONAL VENEER OF LITERARY PHILOSOPHY The problem with those who favor lite

    THE RATIONAL VENEER OF LITERARY PHILOSOPHY

    The problem with those who favor literary thought is that they mistake the suspension of disbelief necessary to empathize, sympathize, and comprehend an author’s work, with the truth, goodness, and possibility of it.

    They rationally justify the quality and desirability of whatever arguments, no matter how sophomoric, but they are only making excuses for the fact that they as suggestible as children, and entirely dependent upon intuition: their reason is just a veneer.

    Science and Law are not seductive. Just the opposite. They are commercial transactions of commodities that allow you to act in the real world, with real costs, and real consequences.

    Fairy tales are for children. Even children of adult and later ages.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 09:59:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/06/10/erdogan-predicts-war-between-the-cross-and-crescent-over-austria-mosque-closures/http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/06/10/erdogan-predicts-war-between-the-cross-and-crescent-over-austria-mosque-closures/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 22:18:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/06/10/erdogan-predicts-war-between-the-cross-and-crescent-over-austria-mosque-closures/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 22:18:00 UTC

  • “Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law

    —“Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law by natural law, reciprocity, order, a competent militia willing to implement incremental suppression of parasitism, and nature (god). The gods (forces of nature) can no longer tolerate lies (superstition, ignorance, bias, deceit, wishful thinking, pseudoscience, parasitism, and theft). Religion is for peasants, truth is for sovereign men and the demand for them is growing.”— Curtus Maximus (who’s real name i do not know)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 22:01:00 UTC

  • How’s the business product coming along?

    How’s the business product coming along?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 20:36:00 UTC

  • I can usually, after a bit of trying, pick out clothes for women, jewelry a bit

    I can usually, after a bit of trying, pick out clothes for women, jewelry a bit harder, purses a bit harder, shoes a lot harder. But women like to take me with them clothing shopping. Personally I like bringing surprises. I’ll see something and say … omg she’d look great in that! and bring it with me.. Rarely wrong.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 17:12:00 UTC

  • I’ve written about the problem of men learning to listen to women for years now,

    I’ve written about the problem of men learning to listen to women for years now, and it seems like one of those things that we ought to be taught as a general man-rule.

    The trick two listening to women is listening 10% and thinking about something else 90% rather than asking a woman to distill her thoughts down to the 10% of facts that matter.

    Worse, we don’t get all the signaling involved between women – it doesn’t exist – so the entire point of communication may in fact be nothing other than the transfer of signals.

    Unfortunately there is no course in ‘woman speak’ for men to take. Even if it’s the most valuable course we could take.

    I just listen. And ask questions. The hard part is learning NOT TO TRY TO SOLVE A PROBLEM. Just listen.

    I think the problem occurs when women ask men to experience their emotions the way another woman does, when they share experiences. This forces men to lie – to pretend either that they understand them, or that they feel them, or that they even can feel them.

    What I’ve found is that if a woman explains how she felt I can undrestand it. But describing the circumstance itself does not help me understand it. Finally, to just show that I understand, and usually that her feelings were justified.

    The hard part is not trying to inquire or solve the problem but just show you understand, accept, and let her express (exit, expend, exhaust) her emotions.

    It’s different with staff. Some women need to be taught that when talking to men, it’s JUST THE FACTS, and WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO?. Otherwise the woman is using my much shallower emotional reservoir and clouding my judgement.

    Most people by a large margin prefer male bosses for the simple reason that we don’t get involved in the emotional stuff. But it’s actually because we don’t even see it, hear it, or understand it. And if we do, we consider it childish and it makes us angry.

    The trick for men with women is always patience. 😉

    Which is in fact, the trick with all human beings.

    Patience is the under appreciated and misunderstood.

    Why? ‘Cause it’s costly


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 14:30:00 UTC

  • THE LAW ALLOWS US TO CREATE RELIGIONS THAT ARE NOT FALSE —“Humans really don’t

    THE LAW ALLOWS US TO CREATE RELIGIONS THAT ARE NOT FALSE

    —“Humans really don’t live day to day in the “conscious” “rational” mode, you know this but it seems you unconsciously push against this fact.”— SG Simmons

    Because religions are relativistic and truth absolute.

    As such in matters of conflict, the truth and the law, supercede religion – for the simple reason that they do in fact supercede it.

    For some reason it is inconceivable to people that we can create religions (as the stoics tried to, as buddha tried to, and the japanese do) that are in fact, not false.

    But this is why I have to work on this problem so hard. And why law is so important. So that we can end the undecidability of religions and produce one that is decidable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 12:38:00 UTC

  • NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT It drives the Left nuts that the New Right owns the

    NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT

    It drives the Left nuts that the New Right owns the scientific discourse, and that it’s now clear progressivisms, in marxist pseudoscientific, feminist pseudoscientific, and postmodern pseudo-rational forms, are just another Religion.

    They can’t deal with the fact that New Right = Scientific Right.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:46:00 UTC