THERE IS NO NATIONAL INTEREST WITHOUT A NATION
There is no national interest without a nation. A nation consists of a tribe of people of not dissimilar language, myths, rituals, traditions, and laws.
If there are competing interests on any of those things you have a bureaucratic empire, not a nation-state.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:29:00 UTC
WE MUST CORRECT OUR ERROR. WE BEGIN AND END WITH THE MILITIA.
We must discard our belief that sovereignty, reciprocity, monarchies, houses, and an independent jury cannot be improved upon. The uncomfortable truth is that either the militia owns the state, the military owns the state, or the bureaucracy owns the state, or the church(academy) owns the state. Or the financial sector owns the state. The only equality of intersets in that list is the MILITIA.
Western civilization begins and ends with the militia. This is how you distinguish between a conservative and a libertarian. Those who fight, and those who preach.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:28:00 UTC
LIMITED LIABILITY IS FINE. IT”S LOSS OF STANDING IN THE COMMONS THAT IS THE PROBLEM
Limited liability is an extension of the function of insurer of last resort to investments, so that individuals can take risks limited to the invested capital unless they engage in fraud. The problem with corporations is that the state has usurped our ability to sue them for impositions of costs on the various commons. This is a simple fix to rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:27:00 UTC
THE MARKET IS A CONSEQUENCE OF SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY, TRUTH, DUTY, AND THE INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY COMMON OF THE COMMON (Tort) LAW.
We create a market by creating sovereignty. we expand the market by incremental suppression of impositions of costs upon the investments made by others. We create private, corporate, and common assets. And we suppress impositions against them. The central problem of sovereignty is reduction of the lower classes that cannot survive in the CURRENT market order. In other words, we must genetically improve our distributions as we improve our productivity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:26:00 UTC
WHY WAS THE EMPIRE LOST?
Well, it was lost by fighting a pair of unnecessary wars in which Germany was in the right, and thereby hollowing out Europe of it’s ancient cultural origins. Doing so collapsed the empire. And the people did not immediately replace a global imperial government with a local national one. As such Britain as much as France, drove marxist imperialism just as hard as the soviets.
The problem was not gutting the government OR working with the USA to restore the British empire. One or the other. But in typical British fashion, just as the french lost their civilization at the loss of the monarchy, just as the Spanish civilization died at their loss of empire, and British lost theirs – and became as useless as the french and Spanish.
Between 1830 and 1914 the British broke from germanic civilization and became Diasporics in every possible sense.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:26:00 UTC
WARRIORS AND TONGUE WAGGERS LIBER-TINE/TARIAN-ISM IS DEAD – IT WAS ALWAYS A LIE
Libertarians (libertines) and ancaps are statistically irrelevant. Predisposed to tongue wagging and not to violence necessary to impose rule of law. So the issue here is that libertinism (rothbardianism, ancapism) is dead. And that classical liberalism is largely dead. And that all that can be learned from the failures of the past 350 years, is that markets-in-everything mean that we should have given additional houses to additional classes as they became participatory, and preserved the houses as a market for commons between the classes, and likewise prohibited the production of law (legislation), only contract between the classes under usual contractual terms.
We had the perfect government with the Scandianvian and germanic monarchies under sovereignty (rule of law of reciprocity, universal standing, and universal applicability), with the monarch as the judge of last resort, and able to dispense with bureaucracies or the government at a whim.
THIS MEANS LIBERTARIANISM IN ALL FORMS WAS ALWAYS A LIE…… Both anglo (classical liberal) and jewish (libertine) were both lies. There is only one law and only one means of imposing it: the organized violence of enough men that the state cannot withstand their revolt.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:23:00 UTC
CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT
THE NEW RIGHT IS THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT
Conservatives were stuck with a moral, religious, traditional set of arguments without themselves understanding why our civilization had ‘sped faster than the rest’. Worse, they bought into the lie just as libertarians bought into the lie of an aristocracy (sovereignty) of everyone.
THE NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT. The alt right uses ridicule, but by and large the new right differs from the old right in that we now have DATA and we have it from a century of failures with the falsehoods of classical liberalism, and the falsehoods of marxist-postmodernism.
My work is just going back to our roots: impose the law with violence and incrementally suppress all transgressions of it. Men will naturally insure kin, so create nation states, or at least small local polities in the Swiss model with federal governments providing only reciprocal decidability over inter-state conflicts, and acting as insurer of last resort.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:23:00 UTC
LISTEN. PEOPLE REVOLT UNDER PREDICTABLE CRITERIA
Listen, people revolt when (a) there are enough excess(unsatisfied) young men, (b) the status quo is no longer tolerable (c) there is some factor that is discreet enough to rally against, (d) they have something to revolt in favor of, (e) they have some idea of the sequence of actions to bring it about, and (f) a vision of the consequences that is better than the status quo.
Talk is cheap. Actions are not. Plans are not. Because both actions and plans are testable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:22:00 UTC
THE LIES OF THE ENLIGHTENMENTS
–“[we suffer from] ideological weakness”—
Actually It’s classical liberal dishonesty combined with malincentives of global empire. There is no possibility of an aristocracy of everyone, nor are we in any way equal. That was just a ruse to sieze power from the landed aristocracy the same way the marxists/socialist/postmodernists have used similar arguments to undermine America – via women’s inclusion in the voting booth. The lie of the bourgeoise society – the theft of aristocratic civilization by classical liberal (middle class) ruse, the way it’s been stolen by the radical (underclass/academic) ruse by claiming oppression.
That lie is what begins it all. There is no such thing as bourgeoise civlization other than the tents of diasporic trade route travelers and pirates, hawking goods in bazaars without liability of warranty.
Aristocracy = Sovereignty. Aristocratic Egalitarians: those who will carry the burden of reciprocal insurance (sovereignty and reciprocity) may join the aristocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:21:00 UTC
ARISTOCRATIC CIVILIZATION = MARKET CIVILIZATION
(period, problems solved)
Power matters. Power is obtained by violence. Laws are imposed. One can either impose natural law (reciprocity) or unnatural law(arbitrary logic).
If libertines and libertarians and classical liberals weren’t perpetuating the lie, and just chose sovereignty and reciprocity which produces nothing but property and markets, then you would have your answer. It’s really simple.
The bourgeoise era has been nothing but a lie.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:21:00 UTC