facebook.comThe Propertarian InstitutePLEASE LIKE/FOLLOW THE PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE PAGE
WHY? We only get 5k slots on a personal page. And the Institute’s page allows us access to more features. Particularly Video (classes).
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 17:41:00 UTC
The Propertarian Institutefacebook.comPLEASE LIKE/FOLLOW THE PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE PAGE
WHY? We only get 5k slots on a personal page. And the Institute’s page allows us access to more features. Particularly Video (classes).
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 17:41:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 17:32:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1ishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1is
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 17:32:00 UTC
OPERATIONALISM?
—“Define operation(alism)”—
Let Me Google That For You:
Scientific Method ->
…. Operational Definition ->
…. …. Operationalism (Physical Sciences) /
…. …. Operationism (Psychology) /
…. …. Intuitionism (Mathematics) /
…. …. Praxeology (Economics)
ie: “Actions”.
See Wiki for simple versions, and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for advanced versions.
HOWEVER, since all science must be falsificationary, all arguments to justificationism (positivism) are false. As such the value of operational language (grammar and semantics) is to force empirical (existential) description as a means of avoiding hand waving, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit.
OTHER CONCEPTS
Critical Rationalism
Critical Preference
Justificationism
Falsificationism
Propertarianism (Vitruvianism, Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, Testimonialism, Natural Law) is all Falsificationary. In other words, like evolution, that which survives falsification is potentially true. And justification either is neutral or reduces the empirical (measurable) content of an argument.
VIA NEGATIVA (FALSIFICATION) VS VIA POSITIVA (JUSTIFICATION)
So imagine a pair of sculptors, one working in stone, subtracting (falsificationism), and the other working in clay, adding, (justificationism).
The two must match, or one, the other, or both is false.
In other words, just as the only test of production is a voluntary exchange, the only test of truth is survival in the market for competition.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 16:25:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/your_posts/35523572_10156436024792264_6576688205511262208_n_10156436024787264.jpg “INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”Günther Shroomachersmart contracts aren’t the same?Jun 18, 2018 3:21pmNick ZitoThere seems to be a close resemblance as I see it through my logic.
I have attempted to get Curt to cover smart contracts as relating to developing an efficient and ‘operational’ means of distributing a basic income but never received a response.
Can smart contracts cover the entire spectrum of due diligence when performing testimonlialsim? I think that would be a good starting point.Jun 19, 2018 9:07amCurt DoolittleyesJun 19, 2018 9:12amCurt DoolittleAlthough, smart contracts as currently constructed are not structured strictly enough.Jun 19, 2018 9:12amNick ZitoI agree. I think they are also currently too simplistic to perform the functions required to cover the scope of Propertariansim and Testimonialism.
I also think this scientific realism is already out of reach for most in terms of understanding and practice that by introducing actual coded forms of Propertariansim and Testimonliasm (law & ethics) is probably still far off any practical use. However, it does seem the logical step in development and implementation.Jun 19, 2018 9:20am”INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 15:19:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35523572_10156436024792264_6576688205511262208_n_10156436024787264.jpg “INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”Günther Shroomachersmart contracts aren’t the same?Jun 18, 2018 3:21pmNick ZitoThere seems to be a close resemblance as I see it through my logic.
I have attempted to get Curt to cover smart contracts as relating to developing an efficient and ‘operational’ means of distributing a basic income but never received a response.
Can smart contracts cover the entire spectrum of due diligence when performing testimonlialsim? I think that would be a good starting point.Jun 19, 2018 9:07amCurt DoolittleyesJun 19, 2018 9:12amCurt DoolittleAlthough, smart contracts as currently constructed are not structured strictly enough.Jun 19, 2018 9:12amNick ZitoI agree. I think they are also currently too simplistic to perform the functions required to cover the scope of Propertariansim and Testimonialism.
I also think this scientific realism is already out of reach for most in terms of understanding and practice that by introducing actual coded forms of Propertariansim and Testimonliasm (law & ethics) is probably still far off any practical use. However, it does seem the logical step in development and implementation.Jun 19, 2018 9:20am”INSTITUTIONS AS CODE”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 15:19:00 UTC
(Yes, the shogun and ghost nation episodes were wasted airtime and should have been split across stories. Otherwise the season’s been ok. Even if we can predict the ending now.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 15:06:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 14:40:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle
Tech has skin in the game. Media doesn’t.
Tech has credibility. Media doesn’t.
Tech is idealistic. So is Media.
Tech is egoistic. So is Media.
Tech is optimistic. Media is pessimistic.
We’re are going to solve both problems at once.
With Free Truthful Speech, and Warranty of Your Speech, and Restitution plus Punishment for False Speech.
The century of propaganda is ended.
No more gossip and lies.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 12:29:00 UTC