Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35539426_10156437694012264_3968698662250348544_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35539426_10156437694012264_3968698662250348544_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35539426_10156437694012264_3968698662250348544_o_10156437694002264.jpg Tim SpillaneClear, concise, and forceful- love it!Jun 19, 2018 11:47amMichael PattinsonClear, Succinct & Sovereign.Jun 20, 2018 8:08am


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 11:09:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35539426_10156437694012264_39686986

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35539426_10156437694012264_39686986

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35539426_10156437694012264_3968698662250348544_o_10156437694002264.jpg Tim SpillaneClear, concise, and forceful- love it!Jun 19, 2018 11:47amMichael PattinsonClear, Succinct & Sovereign.Jun 20, 2018 8:08am


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 11:09:00 UTC

  • NO, EQ IS NOT A THING, BUT…. WHEREAS Intelligence is a Thing Personality Trait

    NO, EQ IS NOT A THING, BUT….

    WHEREAS

    Intelligence is a Thing

    Personality Traits are a Thing. (Conscientiousness and Agreeableness and Neuroticism in particular)

    The Solipsism vs Empathy vs Autism spectrum is a Thing.

    Class Behaviors are a Thing.

    As such it’s (EQ) a questionable proxy for personality traits rather than intelligence. And (I am in the camp) that we should treat intelligence as a personality trait.

    AND WHEREAS

    Higher IQ people are demonstrably more moral than Low IQ people – yes. Although (a) they can afford to be, and (b) they are also less likely to have other defective personality traits and cultural/class behaviors.

    THEREFORE

    So the problem is that people who argue scientifically know EQ is not a thing but pseudoscience that attributes an equality to intelligence to behavioral properties, when in general even intelligence should be classified as a personality trait, and it is personality traits in toto that determine behavior.

    AND THEREFORE

    So what is going on when we criticize use of EQ, is fighting a common problem we deal with in leftism, whether or not one is actually arguing a leftist position, but using the pseudoscientific language of leftists.

    IN OTHER WORDS

    Either learn to use the relevant personality traits or at least recognize you are talking in pseudoscientific nonsense terms.

    Curt.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:37:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35686699_10156437582682264_3235566204592586752_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35686699_10156437582682264_3235566204592586752_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35686699_10156437582682264_3235566204592586752_o_10156437582667264.jpg William L. BengeBOOM! Perfect bifurcation seems so simple and easy to grasp for the masses YET only after someone untangles the irrelevant tangentials and establishes a truthful argument for actual relationalism, and proven function and place and measured order.

    Well done, sir!Jun 19, 2018 10:57amMatt BlackburnMarcos FriasJun 19, 2018 10:39pmMarcos FriasYes. Agreed. I like this. Thank you for showing this to me. This is exactly the school of thought that I appeal to. That and some Rawls, Kant, and Harris thrown in there.Jun 19, 2018 11:35pmMatt BlackburnRight on brotherJun 19, 2018 11:49pm


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35686699_10156437582682264_32355662

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35686699_10156437582682264_3235566204592586752_o_10156437582667264.jpg William L. BengeBOOM! Perfect bifurcation seems so simple and easy to grasp for the masses YET only after someone untangles the irrelevant tangentials and establishes a truthful argument for actual relationalism, and proven function and place and measured order.

    Well done, sir!Jun 19, 2018 10:57amMatt Blackburn@[660034941:2048:Marcos Frias]Jun 19, 2018 10:39pmMarcos FriasYes. Agreed. I like this. Thank you for showing this to me. This is exactly the school of thought that I appeal to. That and some Rawls, Kant, and Harris thrown in there.Jun 19, 2018 11:35pmMatt BlackburnRight on brotherJun 19, 2018 11:49pm


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35744046_10156437580427264_7108138778589396992_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35744046_10156437580427264_7108138778589396992_n_10156437580417264.jpg Kari Anne DorstadLolJun 19, 2018 8:58pm


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:05:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/AJesterWearsAHornedCrown_10155937479802264/35744046_1015643758

    photos_and_videos/AJesterWearsAHornedCrown_10155937479802264/35744046_10156437580427264_7108138778589396992_n_10156437580417264.jpg Kari Anne DorstadLolJun 19, 2018 8:58pm


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:05:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35628860_10156437579362264_6096343289374441472_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35628860_10156437579362264_6096343289374441472_o_10156437579357264.jpg


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:04:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35628840_10156437579302264_3939036960974176256_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35628840_10156437579302264_3939036960974176256_o_10156437579297264.jpg


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:04:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35891924_10156437579032264_3492992233483796480_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35891924_10156437579032264_3492992233483796480_n_10156437579027264.jpg


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 10:04:00 UTC