Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Any evidentiary claim must be either an example (meaning) that is followed by op

    Any evidentiary claim must be either an example (meaning) that is followed by operational construction (falsification), or by non operational correlation, exhaustive evidence, illustrating the limits (falsification). These are the only two search criteria available for scientific(testifiable, due diligence, warrantable) statements.

    Here is what we do in P:

    Create a series of references (examples) that define the limits of the constant relations (properties you’re arguing). This usually takes three or more examples. In most cases I use civilizations.

    We call this disambiguation by serialization and operationalization.

    Then define or explain the term in the series by stating a constructive argument from a sequence of incentives using physical and natural law.

    Then falsify it by testing against all eight dimensions.

    This is the propertarian methodology.

    And this is why it is so difficult to be wrong when making a P-argument.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 11:47:00 UTC

  • THE REVOLUTION IN THE ANCIENT WORLD The revolution in the ancient world was demo

    THE REVOLUTION IN THE ANCIENT WORLD

    The revolution in the ancient world was democritus’ atomism, socratic skepticism (failure), platonic idealism(failure), and the success of aristotelian reason, empiricism, proto-science, stoic and epicurean replacement of conflationary religion, and roman law and administration, creating markets for all peoples – but the semites (the equivalent of ghettos) couldn’t grasp that ‘uncontrolled vision’ and sought to restore controlled (feminine) monopoly and conflation using female methods of deceit, and the female method of undermining from within.

    The revolution in the modern world starts with aesthetics in italy and makes its way into the legal minds who apply it to science producing the anglo revolution (athens). The germans(spartans) reacted by doubling down on it and becoming the worlds best materialists, and the americans inherited both civilizations for a time when the french and russians instigated the third war of german containment.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 11:37:00 UTC

  • IT’S NOT FREE MARKETS ITS RULE OF LAW Free market capitalism is not what raises

    IT’S NOT FREE MARKETS ITS RULE OF LAW

    Free market capitalism is not what raises people. It’s rule of law that limits irreciprocity and forces people into LIMITED MARKETS, not ‘free’ markets. Those markets are limited to the prohibition on externalities. Free market capitalism was invented by the abrahamists to circumvent those limits and to profit from false promise, baiting into harm, harmful externality, and social undermining.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 11:23:00 UTC

  • GETTING TO YOUR PERSONAL EPIPHANY —“I feel you are missing the archetypal expe

    GETTING TO YOUR PERSONAL EPIPHANY

    —“I feel you are missing the archetypal experience description. I get that that could be included in testimonial but feel empirical science/lawful testimony and mystical testimony are two different functions.”—Bill Smith

    Try again. I can sense something there and I probably know how to answer it but I’m not sure.

    —“Scientific experience is summarized in scientific testimonial which leads in the direction of expressions of empirical natural law. … Mystical experience is expressed in poetry, the development of religious structures that send one down a destination-less path and manifestations of the ephemeral like the Runes. … I believe they are different things requiring different metrics and modes of expression and experience.”—Bill Smith

    Correct. The question is, must they be coherent compatible and commensurable even if they are expressed in different grammars: deflationary-scientific vs inflationary-poetic. And my answer is yes. There is no reason for conflict. And it is this conflict that undermines our civlization from within.

    —“If you’re saying what I think you’re saying I’m about to tear up due to the truth you’re conveying… as I’ve never known anyone else who did or even could communicate that fundamental lack intrinsic to our culture.

    That was a powerful experience.

    Actually I think you might have broken me. At least … I hope you did.”—Bill Smith

    Broken means bad? lol.

    What does that mean?

    I’m scared.

    —“Broken as in the change in conscious experience of reality due to a distinguishable event or experience but is dependent on previous works or studies.”—

    Ok. “a moment of sudden revelation or insight.” Revelation, Epiphany, Paradigm Shift.

    (Good. I don’t have to feel guilty all day now. lol -hugs.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 11:21:00 UTC

  • ETHNOCENTRISM, SOVEREIGNTY: RULE OF LAW – ITS ENOUGH. The Via- Positiva Small, h

    ETHNOCENTRISM, SOVEREIGNTY: RULE OF LAW – ITS ENOUGH.

    The Via- Positiva

    Small, homogenous, low power distance, polities under rule of law, and their naturally limited capacity for fiat currency inflation demonstrate the optimum mixed economies for both trade and redistribution.

    The optimum organization of such a polity is by Sovereignty, Rule of law of Reciprocity, an independent cult of the judiciary, a universal militia, a standing professional army of warriors, a monarchy as a judge of last resort, houses for the classes demonstrating contribution to the commons for the production of commons. And markets in everything.

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy because kin selection favors – or at least doesn’t resist – loyalty, high trust, commons, and redistribution.

    Ethno-supremacism is a necessary property of ethnocentrism.

    Europeans are demonstrably superior genetically, culturally, scientifically, medically, technologically, institutionally, civilizationally to all other civilizations in the ancient and modern worlds.

    And we are so for one reason: sovereignty. Everything in our civilization descends from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:55:00 UTC

  • THE FULL CIRCLE OF CURRENCY – by Bill Joslin – From what i understand currency p

    THE FULL CIRCLE OF CURRENCY

    – by Bill Joslin –

    From what i understand currency pertained to debt tracking before it was used for trade. (in group tally of debts within small communities that distributed resources and only engaged in formal trade across groups)(greaber’s Debt)

    (oddly we’ve come full circle with currency created when debts are issued)

    -by Paul Franklin –

    Coinage, then, might have been an attempt to create professional armies to avoid paying them through plunder? Philanthropic.

    Paper money, according to Ezra Pound, was ‘philanthropic’ invention of a Chinese Emperor in a drought, issued to the starving illiterate peasants that they might buy enough of the grain they grew from the Barons who kept it, and not die.

    The barons redeem the paper for the promise of gold declared for their presentation before the Emperor.

    Promise? Is this the same post?

    One message I have for Christians, one thing that I can tell you with the same certainty I can predict tomorrow’s sunrise will occur – Christ is definitely not coming.

    No point in waiting for that promise to be fulfilled.

    Although the implication is therefore that he must already be here?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:49:00 UTC

  • THE CONSISTENCY OF EUROPEAN NATURAL RELIGIONS —“The transition in Hesiod’s the

    THE CONSISTENCY OF EUROPEAN NATURAL RELIGIONS

    —“The transition in Hesiod’s theogony from primordial forces of nature (Titans) through the Titanomachy where the immortals gain mastery over these forces is the same sequence found in the Scandinavian transition from the older Vanir nature gods to the Aesir.”—Scott De Warren

    OUR DESTINY IS GOD HOOD

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:45:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IN ETHNOCENTRISM —“Baiting people into the same Ethno-supremacist bullsh

    TRUTH IN ETHNOCENTRISM

    —“Baiting people into the same Ethno-supremacist bullshit that is the main characteristic of modern day Israel? … Pilpul.. … Still some sharpening to do here.”—Noel Fritsch

    Are you saying that small, homogenous, low power distance, polities under rule of law, and their naturally limited capacity for fiat currency inflation don’t demonstrate the optimum mixed economies for both trade and redistribution?

    Are you saying ethnocentrism isn’t the optimum group strategy?

    Are you saying that ethno-supremacism isn’t a necessary property of ethnocentrism?

    Are you saying that europeans are not demonstrably superior genetically, culturally, scientifically, medically, technologically, institutionally, civilizationally to all other civilizations in the ancient and modern worlds?

    Are you the one engaging in deceit?

    I don’t use pilpul – it requires internal inconsistency and P-logic prevents internal inconsistency.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:43:00 UTC

  • RELIGION WITHOUT LIES IS POSSIBLE: The alternative is european, history, stoicis

    RELIGION WITHOUT LIES IS POSSIBLE:

    The alternative is european, history, stoicism (mindfulness), epicureanism (living within your means), ancestor worship (recognition of debts of intergenerational transfer), the play (tragedy), sport(hunt) and festival (feast).

    No more lies.

    My exploration of paganism is reducible to the ethnocentric advantage of ancestor worship, the raising of ancestors to archetypes, and the market adaptability of the pantheon of archetypes without the need for altering the group strategy or narrative.

    In other words, it facilitates the natural hierarchy of abilities, and it eliminates the need for lying that produces anchoring.

    Like many things our greco roman ancestors had most of the institutions correct – they overextended into civilizational diversity and encountered anceitn primitive people bent on lying.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:35:00 UTC

  • ABRAHAMISM AS LYING TO DISTRACT FROM EVOLUTIONARY DENIALISM by Martin Štěpán and

    ABRAHAMISM AS LYING TO DISTRACT FROM EVOLUTIONARY DENIALISM

    by Martin Štěpán and Curt Doolittle

    Stephen J Gould was posing as an evolutionary biologist where in reality, he was an evolutionary denialist.

    Liars all: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr.

    These people are all evolutionary denialists. Every single one of them. That’s what separates them from the european intellectual tradition, and why they were wrong about everything.

    Why do you think they evolved at the same time as Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzsche?

    Why do you think you have control over the lies your telling now, or that any of these people had control over the lies they were telling?

    In order to prevent falsehood, we categorize lying as not trying to lie, but as not performing due diligence against lying.

    If you try to justify a prior – you’re lying. What science did these people do: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr.

    The scientific method exists to stop you from a justifying a prior, a cognitive bias – or a group’s mythology.

    They didn’t do any science. They made it up.

    Abrahamism = Evolutionary Denialism.

    Why?

    Female group strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:13:00 UTC