Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36408614_10156459019487264_30659262

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36408614_10156459019487264_30659262

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36408614_10156459019487264_3065926240624967680_o_10156459019477264.jpg Trent FowlerCurt: “Have you guys heard the good news of Propertarianism?”

    Them: “Stop. You had me at ‘Aristocracy’”Jun 28, 2018 2:23pmRichie MonteroWhat am I witnessing?Jun 28, 2018 2:25pmRolo Tomasiyou are always with beautiful ladiesJun 28, 2018 2:26pmAndrew SpivakI thought It was Lars Ulrich from Metallica for a second.Jun 28, 2018 2:42pmZach MattoWhen you’re enjoying a night out on the town and you spot an AbrahamistJun 28, 2018 2:45pmStephen KlostermeierniceJun 28, 2018 6:57pmJason Adam MeentemeyerCurt, where are you?Jun 29, 2018 1:44am


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 14:22:00 UTC

  • Evidence that the left is top down organized by narrative-producers, is the shoc

    Evidence that the left is top down organized by narrative-producers, is the shock and silence today just like the few days after the election, while they talk with one another trying to find some narrative.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 14:02:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Curt does your book include a new constit

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark

    Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution.

    The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory.

    The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book.

    This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law.

    What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure.

    And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected…

    The clock ticks,
    the world turns,
    the window opens,
    anger burns.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 13:56:23 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE Reason M

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE

    Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests.

    <-Female———-Ascendent Male——-Established Male->
    ….Consumption………..Production………………Preservation…
    ….Short Term…………Medium Term……………..Long Term…..
    ….Socialism……………..Libertarian………………..Aristocracy….
    ….Gossip…………………..Exchange……………………Force………

    (a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending)

    (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish)

    (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical)

    (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian)

    (e) Where does each sit on this scale?

    Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left.

    In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 13:33:12 UTC

  • OUR WARNING *We alone possess agency, will to create sovereignty, and demand for

    OUR WARNING

    *We alone possess agency, will to create sovereignty, and demand for transcendence. There is no transcendence, no sovereignty, no agency for the weak, the cowardly, the timid, or the dim. And no liberty, nor freedom, nor subsidy for any if we fail.*


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 13:23:00 UTC

  • AGENCY (FULL DEFINITION IN CONTEXT) —“What is the definition of “agency” as the

    AGENCY (FULL DEFINITION IN CONTEXT)

    —“What is the definition of “agency” as the term is used here?”— Daniel Roland

    —“The capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own free choices subject to personal or external limitations. By contrast, *structure* refers to those factors that determine or limit an individual and his or her decisions, such as gender, social class, ethnicity, religion, customs, education, economic institutions, government, propaganda, ability, knowledge, ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deceit. Meaning that one’s agency is determined by the combination of beneficial institutions, abilities, and knowledge and inhibiting institutions, abilities, and knowledge”—

    As an example, God would have perfect agency, because would have perfect knowledge(omniscience), perfect reason, perfect emotions, perfect mindfulness, perfect ability to act (omnipotence), unlimited resources, and no competition, no need to cooperate, and therefore no need for conventions, laws, institutions, or infrastructure.

    As humans we have imperfect knowledge, imperfect reason, imperfect mindfulness, imperfect emotions, limited range of actions, limited resources, and we live in a world where we must compete, must cooperate to compete, and to do so require conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure.

    So, Agency consists of the degree to which one approaches perfect ability to act, when not limited by knowledge, reason, emotions, mindfulness, range of action, available instrumentation, available resources, competition, cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions and infrastructure.

    Given we can never have unlimited knowledge, unlimited resources, and we have limited ability to be free of competition, need for cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure, we can seek largely to improve our knowledge, reason, mindfulness, and assets so that we maximize our agency within the availble limits.

    CONVERSELY (VIA NEGATIVA)

    Remove sources of lack of fitness, lack of character (virtue), lack of resources, sources of normative and institutional resistance, sources of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit – all the impediments to agency – and agency will result. Then selecting a philosophy – a means of decidability – by which one can obtain one’s ends, and an aesthetic that values one’s passions in accordance with that philosophy.

    AGENCY = POTENTIAL ENERGY

    by Simon Ström

    Agency = potential energy (PE)

    Force = applied energy (F)

    Event = Impulse (Imp), [force vector + temporal dimension]

    Consequence = displacement vector (s)

    Action = work (W)

    Externalities = Waste heat (h)

    W = F * s

    SPEAKING IN OPERATIONAL GRAMMAR IS A TEST OF AGENCY

    It is very hard to migrate

    FROM thinking in terms of:

    1 – meaning or experience to your self

    2 – empathy for or meaning to others

    3 – empathy with others intentions

    INTO

    4 – nothing but objective statements of incentives, actors, actions, and consequences.

    Note:

    The degree with which you can do this kind of speech is a direct measure of your own agency.

    SOVEREIGNTY = perfect (exceptionless) reciprocity by perfect (exceptionless) reciprocal insurance, in numbers sufficient to deny violations of reciprocity to all possible (exeptionless) extant numbers.

    PERFECT RECIPROCITY = limiting one’s actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of property – in – toto, limited to productive externalities.

    PROPERTY IN TOTO = That in which one has expended any resource with intent to obtain an interest, without imposing a cost on that which another has expended a resource with the intent to obtain an interest. Synonym: ‘demonstrated property’

    INTEREST: = ergo, leaving only homesteading, transformation, and exchange, as means of obtaining an interest. Synonym: monopoly share (a possession), proportional share (citizenship in a commons), proportional share (private in a common contract), demonstrated share ( a denial of opportunity( such as norms and traditions)

    RESOURCE : life, body, effort, time, attention, kin, material possession, material interest (share), organizational interest, normative interest, institutional interest, informational interest. Synonym: “capital”.

    YIELDS:

    Possession(insured by self defense) > consensual property (insured by reciprocity) > normative property(insured by normative enforcement) > property right (insured by third party enforcement) > natural right(ideal between government and citizens) or human right(ideal between governments). Technically speaking,under rule of law, under natural judge-discovered common law, under perfect reciprocity (sovereignty), natural rights can be brought into existence.

    Under these conditions it is possible to create sovereignty in fact, liberty by permission, freedom by utility, and subsidy by preference.

    (Good luck getting that degree of precision out of parasitic libertines) 😉

    ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY

    Aristocracy: the production of Agency (peers) by the incremental suppression of parasitism, by the use of the common law, leaving no option for survival but market production: the civilization-wide industrialization of the domestication of the animal man, for fun and profit.

    WE ONLY ASK COOPERATION OF THOSE WITH AGENCY OR ITS PROMISE

    We don’t ask cooperation of beasts

    We don’t ask cooperation of domesticated animals.

    We don’t ask cooperation of pets

    We don’t ask cooperation of children

    We don’t ask cooperation of the incapable

    We don’t ask cooperation of those without agency.

    We ask little cooperation of those who request subsidy.

    We ask more cooperation of those who request freedom.

    We ask even more cooperation from those who request liberty.

    We desire the full cooperation of those who possess agency.

    We require and cannot avoid the full cooperation of those who desire sovereignty.

    The few rule the many, to transcend mankind.

    We can rule and transcend, or be ruled and fail to.

    We can possess sovereignty in fact, or something less by permission.

    But to possess sovereignty requires we possess agency.

    And to possess agency we must possess the ability, the knowledge, the fitness and will…

    … the will to fight, kill, slaughter, and destroy.

    There is no transcendence, no sovereignty, no agency for the weak, the cowardly, the timid, or the dim. And no liberty, nor freedom, nor subsidy for others if we fail.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 12:57:00 UTC

  • PARSIMONY BUT INCOMPLETENESS Agency = Action | Truth = Knowledge We never have c

    PARSIMONY BUT INCOMPLETENESS

    Agency = Action | Truth = Knowledge

    We never have complete knowledge(omniscience) or complete agency (omnipotence).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 12:56:00 UTC

  • *Very few of us have the agency to think without the animal in us determining th

    *Very few of us have the agency to think without the animal in us determining the outcome.*


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 12:24:00 UTC

  • “Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project?

    —“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark

    Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution.

    The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory.

    The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book.

    This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law.

    What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure.

    And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected…

    The clock ticks,

    the world turns,

    the window opens,

    anger burns.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 09:56:00 UTC

  • REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of

    REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE

    Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests.

    <-Female———-Ascendent Male——-Established Male->

    ….Consumption………..Production………………Preservation…

    ….Short Term…………Medium Term……………..Long Term…..

    ….Socialism……………..Libertarian………………..Aristocracy….

    ….Gossip…………………..Exchange……………………Force………

    (a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending)

    (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish)

    (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical)

    (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian)

    (e) Where does each sit on this scale?

    Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left.

    In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 09:33:00 UTC