Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Retweeted Steve Stewart-Williams (@SteveStuWi

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Retweeted Steve Stewart-Williams (@SteveStuWill):

    Dunning-Kruger strikes again: People in the lowest IQ quartile overestimate their IQ; people in the highest IQ quartile underestimate theirs https://t.co/Aqqm8PFXYj SEI = self-estimated intelligence https://t.co/gu6A5Em3z5


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:14:34 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Retweeted Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit): “Many

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Retweeted Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit):

    “Many foreign shopkeepers packed up shop early on Sunday out of fear of being attacked.” By this is meant Indian and Chinese shopkeepers, who are a favorite target for black mobs in that country.
    Won’t be long before total collapse. https://t.co/Ff82PFRdqd


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:11:19 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Analytic Philosophy One of the nonsense descr

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Analytic Philosophy

    One of the nonsense descriptions of analytic philosophy is that one is required to write in ‘clear’ prose. This is yet another bit of rationalist nonsense.

    —“it is characterized by an emphasis on argumentative clarity and precision, often making use of formal logic, conceptual analysis, and, to a lesser degree, mathematics and the natural sciences.”—

    The analytic philosophy movement (anglo) evolved out of the anglo predisposition for legal prose, the conversion of mathematics from prose to symbols, and the (desperate) desire of philosophy to find a pretense of calling itself a science.

    As far as I know the movement is dead, as have been most philosophical movements. At present, I am not sure much philosophy exists outside of a study of the evolution of math, logic, science, law, politics, and theology.

    So, it’s not that analytic prose must be clearer per se, in the sense that the average idiot should be able to understand it in colloquial prose (we leave that to the left and the europeans) – it’s that it must be constructed out of terms, phrases, and sentences that are logically testable, and free of analogy, the imaginary, and the phenomenal(experiential) – and the undecidable left to scientific investigation.

    Or as I would say it: it must be stated as mathematical, logical, operational, or scientific argument under natural law.

    The problem is that:
    1) While relations are constant in mathematics they are also trivially simple (positional).
    2) There are always more dimensions in a comparison of references than there are constant relations (this is a truism).
    3) Closure does not exist (overplay contradiction)
    ….
    Argh. I don’t want to go through all this again….
    Rationalism is usable only for interpretation of scriptural law. It evolved out of it. (Pilpul and Critique).

    Justified true belief is nonsense. No amount of justification will determine what is true. It is only survival from criticism that determinse a truth candidate, and justification merely explains one of the roads to rome (understanding).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 23:47:15 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/3/21/14990732/kennedy-retire-supreme-court-scalia-gorsuch?utm_campaign=vox.social&utm_medium=social&utm_source=sprout&utm_content=1530202225https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/3/21/14990732/kennedy-retire-supreme-court-scalia-gorsuch?utm_campaign=vox.social&utm_medium=social&utm_source=sprout&utm_content=1530202225SEE?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 22:46:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/3/21/14990732/kennedy-retire-supreme-court-scalia-gorsuch?utm_campaign=vox.social&utm_medium=social&utm_source=sprout&utm_content=1530202225SEE?

    https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/3/21/14990732/kennedy-retire-supreme-court-scalia-gorsuch?utm_campaign=vox.social&utm_medium=social&utm_source=sprout&utm_content=1530202225


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 22:46:00 UTC

  • Retweeted John Robb (@johnrobb): “World War III is a guerrilla information war w

    Retweeted John Robb (@johnrobb):

    “World War III is a guerrilla information war with no division between military and civilian participation.”

    Marshall McLuhan (1970)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 22:40:00 UTC

  • Retweeted GroyperBot20K (@KANTBOT20K): As a libertarian I believe the market has

    Retweeted GroyperBot20K (@KANTBOT20K):

    As a libertarian I believe the market has once again achieved the most efficient result, the commodification of tragedy by the media has culminated in active shooters simply attacking news outlets directly thereby cutting out the school middle man and reducing child-waste


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 22:39:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Saku P 🚀 (@sknthla): Still blows my mind that culture can take us from

    Retweeted Saku P 🚀 (@sknthla):

    Still blows my mind that culture can take us from a hunter gatherer society where 1/3 of men die from murder, to a society where people go to cupcake stores and take improv classes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 22:37:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. AGENCY, VIA POSITIVA AND VIA NEGATIVA Again,

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    AGENCY, VIA POSITIVA AND VIA NEGATIVA
    Again, whether we are talking the existing definition in social science, or my extended definition in natural law, Agency refers to the absence of impediment, the same way that truth refers to the absence of falsehood. We do not know what the unknown impediments and falsehoods consists of we only know that they are removable.

    As such:
    One can grant authority (permission in your stead).
    One can delegate (assign tasks and responsibilities).
    One can educate (remove ignorance)
    One can physically emotionally and mentally train (give discipline)
    One can discover (produce new knowledge with which to educate)
    One can remove impediments (govern or rule)

    So again, via positiva the sculptor constructs (justifies) with clay, or via negativa removes (criticizes) the stone.

    The scientist via positiva creates an opportunity for knowledge( hypothesis), and via negativa performs criticism (theory), then submits it to the market for further testing (survival)

    Just as via positive the abrahamist (sophist) via positiva constructs an excuse (Lies) with Pilpul to cause a moral hazard, or via negativa evades (Lies ) with Critique to destroy a moral good.

    The truth is created by a market competition between via positiva and via negativa. A sophism is created by the avoidance of market competition in both the real (physical) and ideal (imaginary) worlds.

    WHAT KIND OF IMPEDIMENTS?

    Well, we don’t know what future limitation we might encounter, but we are impeded (limited) in mental capacity, mindfulness, knowledge, physical ability, resources, time, social, political, our physical world, and the laws of nature.

    So imagination, thought, independence from emotions, impulses and biases, knowledge, models of knowledge, the rate of knowledge accumulated, physical size, strength, speed, perception, health, cellular degeneration, biological composition, energy, physical resources, time, limits of imposed upon us by others, and the limits of controlling of others, and the limited abilities of others, and the limitations of the environment and the physical universe.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 22:31:33 UTC

  • Retweeted Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit): The Inquisition was basically about the co

    Retweeted Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit):

    The Inquisition was basically about the continued “groupness” of Jews who had converted or pretended to convert to Catholicism (Separation & Its Disconents, Ch. 4). It was a mild procedure by the standards of its time. https://t.co/MIxyAyvLa4


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 21:44:00 UTC