Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • NO MORE LIES Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are

    NO MORE LIES

    Statements are true or they are not.

    They are desirable or the are not.

    To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying.

    To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 20:09:00 UTC

  • To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the

    To: Kimberly Kay

    Statements are true or they are not.

    They are desirable or the are not.

    To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying.

    To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.

    There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed?

    Why didn’t china have a problem until marx?

    Why did india avoid the problem?

    Why is western civlization experiencing the problem?

    Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise?

    Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law?

    These are the big questions of our age.

    BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism.

    Statements are true or they are not.

    They are desirable or the are not.

    To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying.

    To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 20:09:00 UTC

  • “Well deserved constructive criticism of the church and its failure. I want to f

    —“Well deserved constructive criticism of the church and its failure. I want to fight for my God.”— J

    Thats one more in the handful of people who understand what I’m trying to do. 😉

    Appealing and appeasing doesn’t work.

    This will work.;)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 19:46:00 UTC

  • FROM ELSEWHERE (evidence the movement is spreading) —“… propertarians ….”-

    FROM ELSEWHERE

    (evidence the movement is spreading)

    —“… propertarians ….”—

    From Doolittle:

    “Why is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why are the left’s strategy of disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and *methods warfare* and *methods of argument* replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization?”

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 19:34:00 UTC

  • TERRIBLE ANSWERS, I’LL TRY TO IMPROVE THEM WITH THE SCIENCE OF IT Why the wealth

    TERRIBLE ANSWERS, I’LL TRY TO IMPROVE THEM WITH THE SCIENCE OF IT

    Why the wealth of western civilization?

    Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators.

    Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive.

    Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish.

    For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices. (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort.

    So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism.

    TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 18:18:00 UTC

  • “God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and

    —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 18:11:00 UTC

  • “Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care

    –“Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care how you do it if you’re trying. But you don’t seem to want to. So stop begging others to do it for you in the manner more to your liking without contributing to rule.”— Ospin88

    This is my underlying complaint about christians. I don’t believe them. All I see are women whining so that men will protect them.

    There was a reason it took the viking invasion and viking warriors to conduct the crusades. There was a reason the french couldn’t resist them.

    Christianity has only been strong when it wailing women handkerchief that inspires and licenses aryanism (heroic, expansionist, entrepreneurial, militarism).

    I am not the only person to say that christianity is a means of keeping the peasants pliable and working so that the aristocracy can afford expensive weaponry. Or that the only time christian banners fly is to legitimize aryanism.

    I mean, what separates a christian monarchy from a kingdom? The license of the church to use violence.

    If christianity s strong then christian men would be the first in line rather than constitutionalists and pagans, while docile christians show up and wave flags when the hard work is done.

    Give me a pope who defense europen civilization not the faith. Christianity is a third world religion.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 18:01:00 UTC

  • “You will either rule or be ruled. Blessed or not.”— Ospin88

    —“You will either rule or be ruled. Blessed or not.”— Ospin88

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 18:00:00 UTC

  • IGNORANCE BY DESIGN by Daniel Roland Anderson There were maybe 10-15 people in m

    IGNORANCE BY DESIGN

    by Daniel Roland Anderson

    There were maybe 10-15 people in my law school Constitutional Law class who’d read the entire Constitution.

    Only one had ever read the Federalist Papers—and that was before undergrad, not part of undergrad.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 17:58:00 UTC

  • POSSIBILITIES UNDER THE LAW One cannot legislate belief(thought) One cannot legi

    POSSIBILITIES UNDER THE LAW

    One cannot legislate belief(thought)

    One cannot legislate unbelief(thought)

    One can legislate public speech(display, word, and deed)

    One can legislate proselytizing(sale and distribution)

    One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 17:57:00 UTC