Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 18:25:42 UTC

  • YES. WHAT HE SAID! 😉 (i’m too busy writing Doolittleism to Read Doolittleisms.)

    YES. WHAT HE SAID! 😉
    (i’m too busy writing Doolittleism to Read Doolittleisms.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 17:26:52 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. PROPERTARIANISM IS FALSIFIABLE BUT VERY DIFFI

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    PROPERTARIANISM IS FALSIFIABLE BUT VERY DIFFICULT TO FALSIFY

    —“Since you pride yourself in being honest, may I ask what exactly one would have to prove in order to fully refute Propertarianism?”—Josef Kalinin

    —(Quoting Curt): “And my argument is that the west invented Truth coherent with reality and a social order also coherent with reality, and that this is the reason for our military, political, economic, scientific, and intellectual competitiveness.”— Nick Zito

    —“Property En-Toto & Acquisitionism is quite central to the entire Propertarian framework. Provide a substantive refute of these and you may cause a dent. You can find the full scoped definitions of these at Propertarianism.com”—Nick Zito

    ^ What he said. In addition, add reciprocity and reasonableness(rationality) of choice. both of which i think are nearly impossible to refute.

    The reason it’s falsifiable but difficult to falsify is that it’s not so much a model as a description of constant relations from physics through sentience. Three points test a line so to speak, and the more points the more certain the line.

    1) The Grammars(metaphysics), 2) Acquisitionism + Property in Toto (psychology), 3) Propertarianism (Sociology), and 4) Natural Law of Reciprocity (Cooperation) are falsifiable but extremely difficult to falsify.

    Even if we state how it can be done by stating the premises(dependencies) those premises are extremely difficult to falsify. The reason being that they are continuously consistent, correspondent, possible, and coherent with everything we know to date.

    I mean… that was my objective. A scientific language of cooperation (ethics, morality, law, politics, group strategy)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 17:20:58 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Existence is Persistence. Only Natural La

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Existence is Persistence. Only Natural Law persists. Gods are a educational means by which we use Fictional Archetypes to understand and implement said Natural Law in an organized society consisting of people with a distribution of understandings due to age, experience, and ability – be it Pagan aspects or wholesale icons such as the ‘Logos’ as Jesus Christ.”—@Andrew Robert

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 17:10:12 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. GRAMMARS: Myths > Fictionalisms > Literatures

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    GRAMMARS: Myths > Fictionalisms > Literatures (fictions) > Histories > Sciences > Logics > Senses

    The continuous recursive disambiguation of reality, from the most intuitionistic and subjective measurements, to the most non-intuitive and objective measurements.

    All speech consists of weights and measures. We just constantly improve our weights and measures.

    Parsimony(a fully accounted consistency, correspondence, possibility, and coherence) consists of the true names of the categories of the universe.

    They are just very costly and time consuming for humans to discover.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 17:05:46 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. So far, every argument every person has made

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    So far, every argument every person has made against Propertarianism (Natural Law under Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism) is trying to do nothing other than engage in persuasion by deception, rather than truthful, fully informed, productive, warrantied, exchange.

    “What can I get away with” is just an excuse. That’s what ‘justificationism means’

    There is only one question. If you won’t or can’t argue testimonials, then the only reasons are fraud, evasion of due diligence and liability (warranty), or both.

    It’s not complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 16:53:02 UTC

  • WE WILL DESTROY THEM FOREVER We are going to destroy them you know: 1) Reinforce

    WE WILL DESTROY THEM FOREVER

    We are going to destroy them you know:

    1) Reinforce Trademarks, Eliminate Copyrights and Drastically limit patents.

    2) Outlaw lying in the commons by involuntary liability and warranty of words.

    3) De-financialize the credit system and eliminate consumer interest on consumer capital assets (residences and appliances and autos).

    4) Eliminate the transportability (escape) of debt instruments while institutionalize the rights to income from it.

    5) Reform shareholder laws to prevent hostile takeovers, and to equalize risk and exit.

    6) Restructure taxation rates to reflect risk. Eliminate double taxation of dividends.

    This will have the effect of destroying nearly all manipulation of the population and all rent seeking.

    This will be the greatest competitive advantage since the invention of fiat credit.

    It means that there are no rents that allow you to escape the market – anywhere. Even at scale.

    Taxes for entrepreneurs, particularly small and medium businesses will nearly disappear.

    Huge reallocation of intellectual capital.

    Huge reduction in propaganda.

    Huge temporary expansion of courts and litigation until enough law accumulates on the books.

    STARVE THE BEAST.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 16:35:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. ENDORSEMENT: As an economist (not as a libert

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    ENDORSEMENT:

    As an economist (not as a libertarian or conservative) I am endorsing Bob Stefanowski for Governor of Connecticut.

    I don’t usually get involved with ‘domestic disputes’ but this man is rock solid and his plan will rescue the state from collapse both demographic, economic, legal, and financial.

    Connecticut, Massachusetts, and California are the three states where the left intellectuals (Yale, Harvard, Berkeley) were able to assert the greatest influence on policy due to the density of working class labor in the east, and the immigration wealth generated by the settlement and expansion of California.

    California has such immigration demand due to the desirability of pacific coastal living, theincrease in asian port activity, and the movement of the tech sector from Boston to San Francisco.

    Mass has partly corrected because the loss of the tech sector forced them to reorganize slowly since 1986.

    Connecticut has not corrected for reasons that include extraordinary tax income from NYC revenues, but CT residency, and the continuous flight of industry from the state. (And the rather high minded puritanical virtue-cycle self-delusional character of new englanders ).

    Connecticut has driven out anyone who can afford to leave. it has one asset and many liabilities. The asset is the territory itself which is an extremely desirable bit of greenery and rolling hills that make residential life … idyllic. The liability is that it’s populated with sh_t-holes from Springfield MA, south to Windsor, Bloomfield, Hartford, East Hartford, Manchester, Willimantic, Norwich, Newington, New Britain, Bristol, Waterbury, Wallingford, North Haven, Hamden, New Haven, Milford and Bridgeport.

    Basically everything within five miles of the north-south corridor is a sh_t-hole. Every small town on the other hand is a remnant of ‘little england’ and it’s migration to ‘new england’.

    This cannot be fixed without either radical exit of the working and underclasses (unlikely), or radical entry of SCIENTIFIC higher education (my idea), and radical attraction of wealthy settlers (coasts), and radical attraction of business.

    This Candidate may or may not succeed. But he is the real deal when it comes to finance, economics, and taxes.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 16:33:05 UTC

  • SEE. ITS WORKING (New temple to the Asatru in Iceland has enough members to supp

    SEE. ITS WORKING

    (New temple to the Asatru in Iceland has enough members to support it.)

    Religions work by satisfying the pack instinct.
    Historical polytheisms (ancestor worship) where ancestors represent archetypes, and where myths represent group evolutionary strategy both between men and between men and nature.

    “These ‘gods’ are just archetypes that teach us about the world we live in.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 16:03:35 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE GRAMMARS OF DECEPTION AND ADDICTION the p

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE GRAMMARS OF DECEPTION AND ADDICTION

    the purpose of christianity is subjugation (submission)
    the purpose of judaism is subjugation (submission).
    the purpose of islam is subjugation (submission)

    Abrahamic grammars of pilpul and critique are simply well constructed lies that through repeated use produce an addiction response, the same way that membership in (submission to) the pack or tribe produces an addiction response.

    It’s a brilliant hack really.
    Evil as hell.
    But brilliant.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 15:58:22 UTC