Source: Facebook

  • The Grammars is going to turn on a light bulb in your head that will change you

    The Grammars is going to turn on a light bulb in your head that will change you forever.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 12:52:00 UTC

  • DEMARCATION BETWEEN ANIMAL AND HUMAN? Is the demarcation between animal and huma

    DEMARCATION BETWEEN ANIMAL AND HUMAN?

    Is the demarcation between animal and human speech or agency? Because I am increasingly convinced it’s agency and the vast majority of humans are in fact merely animals.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 12:50:00 UTC

  • MOST IMPORTANT SINGLE PAPER YOU CAN READ (repost, via John Mark)

    http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.htmlhttp://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.htmlTHE MOST IMPORTANT SINGLE PAPER YOU CAN READ

    (repost, via John Mark)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 12:49:00 UTC

  • MOST IMPORTANT SINGLE PAPER YOU CAN READ (repost, via John Mark)

    http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.htmlTHE MOST IMPORTANT SINGLE PAPER YOU CAN READ

    (repost, via John Mark)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 12:49:00 UTC

  • MONEY AND MONETARY AGGREGATES: MALINCENTIVES ALL AROUND Yes, I work from the Mis

    MONEY AND MONETARY AGGREGATES: MALINCENTIVES ALL AROUND

    Yes, I work from the Misesian premise of full accounting when referring to money and its substitutes, and the totality of monetary aggregates.

    However, the problem with the Austrian model is (as has always been stated) it’s overly respectful of lenders (asset holders) without accounting for the moral hazard most money lenders profit from.

    This is ‘unsaid’ in the literature of both sides. It’s this competition between the moral premises of consumer vs lenders vs the judiciary (state) that over the priority to which we must grant the malincientives of either party and therefore the rewards of either party.

    I tend to err on the side of lender beware almost always, and the lender and borrower beware of the state at all possible times.

    All parties: state, lender, and borrower have malincentives.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 12:09:00 UTC

  • ARGUMENTATIVE WEAPONRY —“I know it’s public, but I thought it’d still be polit

    ARGUMENTATIVE WEAPONRY

    —“I know it’s public, but I thought it’d still be polite if I asked. Would it bother you if I used a specific comment you made on one of your statuses in a conversation? You make some really good points.”— A Friend

    Look. Here is how this deal works. I get to use the public as a testing ground, and in exchange (a) you get to learn how to argue, and (b) you get to use my work products as you see fit.

    My job, our job, is to create argumentative weaponry in order to provide libertarians and aristocrats (conservatives) a post-moralizing (and therefore scientific) means of argument against the pseudoscience, pseudorationalism, and outright lying of leftists.

    It’s a good deal for both of us. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 11:54:00 UTC

  • “For Russians a true free will (volya) is enjoyed either by Tsar, an absolute mo

    —“For Russians a true free will (volya) is enjoyed either by Tsar, an absolute monarch, or by free roaming cossack, vagabond, criminal, who does not have to take the wishes of other people into consideration and either goes into unsettled land where he may continue to live unattached, or to go underground into criminal world, or to become a Tsar. Stalin embodied both criminal and Tsar russian archetypes.”—Igor Rogov

    The origin of our differences: Limited to Reciprocity vs Unlimited by Reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 10:51:00 UTC

  • TEMPORAL VS INTERTEMPORAL DECIDABILITY The difference between law and science is

    TEMPORAL VS INTERTEMPORAL DECIDABILITY

    The difference between law and science is that in questions of law, individuals in conflict demand a decision from judge and jury in the present where in science we explicitly deny this demand, and in philosophy where we never do so, and in religion we presume it already made.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 10:46:00 UTC

  • GENERAL IDEAS: A “FIELD” IN MATHEMATICS (repost by request) Given a six sided di

    GENERAL IDEAS: A “FIELD” IN MATHEMATICS

    (repost by request)

    Given a six sided die, and the single operation “roll the die”, we can produce a noisy distribution of :

    1(x1), 2(x1), 3(x1), 4(x1), 5(x1), 6(x1).

    Given two six sided dice, and the single operation “roll the dice and sum the results”, we can produce a noisy distribution of:

    2(x1), 3(x2), 4(x3), 5(x4), 6(x5), 7(x6), 8(x5), 9(x4),

    10(x3), 11(x2), 12(x1).

    The difference between the one-die and two-die distributions is that while the results of rolling one die are equidistributed between 1 and 6, with two dice the results of rolling can produce more combinations that sum to 7 than there are that sum to 2 and 12, and therefor the results are normally distributed: in a bell curve.

    We can produce the same results with logic instead of numbers: For example, we can take the two words “Even” and “Odd”, and define two operations: “addition” and “multiplication”. Then apply the operations to all pairs:

    Even + Even = Even,

    Even + Odd = Odd + Even = Odd,

    Odd + Odd = Even,

    Even x Even = Even x Odd = Odd x Even = Even,

    Odd x Odd = Odd.

    And we can produce the same set of results with *any grammatically correct operations on a set, given the operations possible on the set*; including the set of Ordinary Language using Ordinary Language grammar. Although, unlike our simple examples using dice, the set of combinations of ordinary language is not closed, and so the number of combinations is infinite.

    So any grammar allows us to produce a distribution of results, and a density (frequency) of result.

    In mathematics this result set is called a ‘field’. A field consists of all the possible results of a set of operations on a set’s members, that are selected from the range of possible operations on those set members.

    So in any set of results there will be a range of very dense, less dense, sparse, and empty spaces in the set’s distribution.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 10:22:00 UTC

  • WISDOM VS TRUTH There is a reason the operational name of mythology is “Wisdom L

    WISDOM VS TRUTH

    There is a reason the operational name of mythology is “Wisdom Literature”. Because it contains wisdom that has survived market competition for centuries if no millennia.

    I have a rather defensive posture with regard to the term ‘truth’. So in order to defend the word ‘truth’ from abuses, the correct term is not ‘truth’ (most parsimonious description in operational terms) but ‘wisdom’ (analogy or general rule).

    It is the survival of this wisdom from market competition over time that provides the empirical evidence of the wisdom therein.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 10:10:00 UTC