Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE MEANING OF “EDUCATION ASSOCIATED GENES” –

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE MEANING OF “EDUCATION ASSOCIATED GENES”

    —“Education-associated genes”? I’m a bit skeptical that such are really verified.”—Rich Berger

    It’s just a politically correct term for the 1000+ IQ correlated genes that have been discovered as yet. Most public estimations of IQ are done by degrees (a very bad proxy by the way), and by framing education related genes rather than IQ they circumvent criticism by the anti-IQ-measurement groups.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 17:12:38 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. ARISTOTLE: THOSE WITHOUT AGENCY ARE BEASTS TO

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    ARISTOTLE: THOSE WITHOUT AGENCY ARE BEASTS TO BE RULED
    From Alexander of Macedon by Peter Green

    “He had the whole body of Greek civilized opinion
    behind him. Euripides held that it was proper (eikos) for
    ‘barbarians’ to be subject to Greeks. Plato and Isocrates
    both thought of all non-Hellenes as natural enemies who
    could be enslaved or exterminated at will. Aristotle himself
    regarded a war against barbarians as essentially j ust.48 Such
    theories may well be dismissed as grotesque; but they are no
    more grotesque than de Gobineau’s concept of the Aryan
    superman. And grotesque or not, they have the power to
    compel belief, and thus to affect men’s lives in the most
    fundamental way. When Hitler exterminated the European
    Jews, he based his actions, precisely, on the belief that
    certain categories of mankind could be dismissed as sub-
    human — that is, like Aristotle, he equated them with
    beasts or plants.

    For Aristotle, however, the brute or vegetable nature of
    barbarians had a special quality, which must have struck a
    responsive chord in his pupil. ‘No one,’ he wrote, ‘would
    value existence for the pleasure of eating alone, or that of
    sex . . . unless he were utterly servile’ (i.e. slave or bar-
    barian). To such a person, on the other hand, it would
    make no difference whether he were beast or man. The key example he cites is the Assyrian voluptuary Sardanapalus
    (Assurbanipal): barbarians, it is clear, are to be despised
    above all because they live exclusively through and for the senses.

    The purely hedonistic life, in fact, was something which
    Aristotle taught his pupil to regard as beneath contempt.
    Such a doctrine must have had a strong appeal for Alex-
    ander, who always placed a premium on self-control and
    self-denial (at least during the earlier stages of his career),
    and whose enthusiastic, impressionable nature reveals a
    strong hero-worshipping streak. (It made no odds to him
    whether his hero was mythical or contemporary: he may
    have modelled himself on Achilles, but he was equally
    ready to adopt the quick-stepping gait of his old tutor
    Leonidas.) The Alexander who ate so sparingly, who gave
    away the spoils of war with such contemptuous generosity,
    keeping little for himself, and who said he was never more
    conscious of his own mortality than ‘during the time he lay
    with a woman or slept’50 — this, surely, was a man whose
    debt to Aristotle’s teaching and influence was fundamental.
    For good or ill, the years at Mieza left a permanent mark
    on him.

    Aristotle’s advice on the respective treatment of Greeks
    and barbarians is, of course, capable of a more mundane
    interpretation: that in order to get the best out of those
    whom one intends to exploit, one must humour them far
    enough to win their cooperation. Greeks required to be
    treated as equals, to have their sense of independence –
    however illusory -— fostered with the greatest care. Asiatics,
    on the other hand, would only respond to, or respect, a
    show of rigorous authoritarianism — the Victorian district
    officer’s creed. Whether Aristotle intended this lesson or not,
    it was one that Alexander learnt all too well. As we shall
    see, he applied it to every individual or group with whom he
    subsequently came in contact.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:47:43 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. IN OTHER WORDS AFRICA WAS A MICROCOSM OF AFRO-EURA

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    IN OTHER WORDS AFRICA WAS A MICROCOSM OF AFRO-EURASIA


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:28:09 UTC

  • Emmy Awards By Network: Netflix 112 , HBO 108. NBC 78, FX Networks 50, CBS 34, A

    Emmy Awards By Network:

    Netflix 112 ,

    HBO 108.

    NBC 78,

    FX Networks 50,

    CBS 34,

    ABC 31

    Showtime 21.

    Amazon 0 (zero).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:13:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/36912310_10156491356507264_3357716410225655808_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/36912310_10156491356507264_3357716410225655808_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/36912310_10156491356507264_3357716410225655808_n_10156491356502264.jpg ARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISMAlex Annenhttps://youtu.be/6KqkyNnm7BcJul 12, 2018 4:28pmJim KosidloSmart manJul 12, 2018 4:42pmNicholas SmithDiversity divides.Jul 12, 2018 4:57pmJacob SmithIn republic Socrates states the importance of a brotherhood between Hellenic city states that forbids full scale war, advice that the ruling class of the time should have listened to.Jul 12, 2018 5:12pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume FayeJul 12, 2018 5:50pmVivek NaAmazing – he says exactly what I always believed and should be self evident from evolution.

    We are less chaotic when surrounded by people like ourselves. Familiarity breeds consentJul 12, 2018 6:13pmSavannah DicksonWho translated this?Jul 12, 2018 7:36pmSavannah DicksonEvery post of Nationalist SocialismJul 12, 2018 7:37pmAndrew ClaytonThe modern trend to treat democracy as a synonym for good is a terrible mistake, assuming it is a mistake… 🤔Jul 12, 2018 7:50pmChrisGabriel Ryan Jonathon PerdisJul 12, 2018 8:03pmDennis NikonovCurt I posted this on your timeline a couple months ago :)Jul 12, 2018 8:13pmOliver CrokeWhat book is that?Jul 12, 2018 8:22pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume Faye. It’s a great book and an easy readJul 12, 2018 8:23pmOliver CrokeThanks!Jul 12, 2018 8:23pmBrian D RobisonBill AlanJul 12, 2018 8:27pmFlorian GeyerMutilating the classics is an abominable crime.Jul 12, 2018 8:58pmJustico Mitchelldemocracy is trash, tho. not on some “voting is violence” “reeee, collectivism” type shit, either.Jul 12, 2018 9:33pmMatthew GenackIt’s less than ideal in a homogeneous country, and dysfunctional in a heterogeneous country.Jul 12, 2018 9:40pmJustico Mitchelli don’t use that many words to say “trash.” i don’t have a great vocabulary.Jul 12, 2018 9:41pmCurt Doolittlenot sure who I got it from other than it wasn’t sharable. Probably you then. lol ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmCurt DoolittleI’m slow sometimes….. ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmChris Dobsonlmao ive been sharing this with ppl for the last 5 yearsJul 13, 2018 12:24amAlex IrizarryWhy do I feel like most of you are confusing ethnic with racial?Jul 13, 2018 4:49amRyan Partingtonmight be trash, but it’s the trashbag with old food in it instead of the trashbag with old used needles in itJul 13, 2018 8:49amRyan PartingtonThis’d be arguing why mutliculturalism doesnt work then. That you can be any size, shape or colour of citizen, but if you dont take part in the culture you’re in it causes friction. Due to your status as a minority group you cant make any political decisions based on your group, which means you have to join up with a larger group. That’s why democrats want open borders and mass immigration, because they’re the party that gets the votes from non-americansJul 13, 2018 8:52amOscar Svanbergit’s true for race aswell.Jul 13, 2018 10:09amJordanus NicolausTiger

    wow what a truly excellent reading of aristotle

    unparalleled scholarshipJul 13, 2018 10:33amFrederic DurffDiversity of males that is.

    Women can adapt to any society as long as they’re provided for. Only males care about kinship.Jul 13, 2018 11:42amJay DizzleDoes anyone know where this came from?Jul 13, 2018 9:00pmMatt DiasBrandon DylanJul 16, 2018 8:29pmAlex IrizarryRyan Partington democrats don’t want open borders lolJul 16, 2018 8:49pmDan BeateauWould you mind telling me the text this is from?Jul 17, 2018 5:25amCurt DoolittleDennis Nikonov What book is the text from? do you know? It turns out I got this image from Twitter. So I don’t know.Jul 17, 2018 11:02amKevin FenchakWhy We Fight by Guillame FayeJul 17, 2018 12:35pmKevin FenchakHis “metapolitical dictionary”Jul 17, 2018 12:35pmDale MillerHISTORY REPEATING ITSELF ! WOW 😮Jul 17, 2018 6:35pmAna KrosniakAnd yet it is not right to reproduce with foreign women and create mutts within the country that is also harmful.Jul 17, 2018 7:57pmKarl SchmidtYeaJul 21, 2018 1:21amFrederic Durff1) That graph has been used over and over again in many debates. It’s highly flawed to use it imo for several reasons:

    a) A guy can date outside his race and still want kids from a female of his own race: I sleep with black women and Asian women a lot yet would never have kids with a non-white.

    b) Women on dating sites apply rational thinking to their dating preferences. A woman meeting a nice guy that’s not of her race in her every day life would care way less about his race as long as he’s not too ugly/dumb/poor.

    c) if that graph was the absolute truth you’d see equal representations in real life: yet black man/white woman is way more prevalent than black woman/white man.

    2) the 90% not feminist figure is stupid and only exists because of the way the question is asked and how women associate feminism with nagging, bald or pink-dyed hair activists. But 99% of Western women are feminists.Jul 21, 2018 5:24amARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:08:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36912310_10156491356507264_33577164

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36912310_10156491356507264_33577164

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36912310_10156491356507264_3357716410225655808_n_10156491356502264.jpg ARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISMAlex Annenhttps://youtu.be/6KqkyNnm7BcJul 12, 2018 4:28pmJim KosidloSmart manJul 12, 2018 4:42pmNicholas SmithDiversity divides.Jul 12, 2018 4:57pmJacob SmithIn republic Socrates states the importance of a brotherhood between Hellenic city states that forbids full scale war, advice that the ruling class of the time should have listened to.Jul 12, 2018 5:12pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume FayeJul 12, 2018 5:50pmVivek NaAmazing – he says exactly what I always believed and should be self evident from evolution.

    We are less chaotic when surrounded by people like ourselves. Familiarity breeds consentJul 12, 2018 6:13pmSavannah DicksonWho translated this?Jul 12, 2018 7:36pmSavannah DicksonEvery post of Nationalist SocialismJul 12, 2018 7:37pmAndrew ClaytonThe modern trend to treat democracy as a synonym for good is a terrible mistake, assuming it is a mistake… 🤔Jul 12, 2018 7:50pmChris@[100000554603882:2048:Gabriel Ryan] @[100001051667274:2048:Jonathon Perdis]Jul 12, 2018 8:03pmDennis NikonovCurt I posted this on your timeline a couple months ago :)Jul 12, 2018 8:13pmOliver CrokeWhat book is that?Jul 12, 2018 8:22pmKarl SchmidtWhy We Fight, by Guillaume Faye. It’s a great book and an easy readJul 12, 2018 8:23pmOliver CrokeThanks!Jul 12, 2018 8:23pmBrian D Robison@[100006869018359:2048:Bill Alan]Jul 12, 2018 8:27pmFlorian GeyerMutilating the classics is an abominable crime.Jul 12, 2018 8:58pmJustico Mitchelldemocracy is trash, tho. not on some “voting is violence” “reeee, collectivism” type shit, either.Jul 12, 2018 9:33pmMatthew GenackIt’s less than ideal in a homogeneous country, and dysfunctional in a heterogeneous country.Jul 12, 2018 9:40pmJustico Mitchelli don’t use that many words to say “trash.” i don’t have a great vocabulary.Jul 12, 2018 9:41pmCurt Doolittlenot sure who I got it from other than it wasn’t sharable. Probably you then. lol ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmCurt DoolittleI’m slow sometimes….. ;)Jul 12, 2018 9:51pmChris Dobsonlmao ive been sharing this with ppl for the last 5 yearsJul 13, 2018 12:24amAlex IrizarryWhy do I feel like most of you are confusing ethnic with racial?Jul 13, 2018 4:49amRyan Partingtonmight be trash, but it’s the trashbag with old food in it instead of the trashbag with old used needles in itJul 13, 2018 8:49amRyan PartingtonThis’d be arguing why mutliculturalism doesnt work then. That you can be any size, shape or colour of citizen, but if you dont take part in the culture you’re in it causes friction. Due to your status as a minority group you cant make any political decisions based on your group, which means you have to join up with a larger group. That’s why democrats want open borders and mass immigration, because they’re the party that gets the votes from non-americansJul 13, 2018 8:52amOscar Svanbergit’s true for race aswell.Jul 13, 2018 10:09amJordanus Nicolaus@[623365840:2048:Tiger]

    wow what a truly excellent reading of aristotle

    unparalleled scholarshipJul 13, 2018 10:33amJay DizzleDoes anyone know where this came from?Jul 13, 2018 9:00pmGregory Aluf KoshkinWhich book?Jul 16, 2018 7:12pmGregory Aluf KoshkinIt works well in Switzerland and Hong Kong. Small scale and homogeneous.Jul 16, 2018 7:14pmMatt Dias@[100013876667622:2048:Brandon Dylan]Jul 16, 2018 8:29pmAlex IrizarryRyan Partington democrats don’t want open borders lolJul 16, 2018 8:49pmDan BeateauWould you mind telling me the text this is from?Jul 17, 2018 5:25amCurt Doolittle@[1300401473:2048:Dennis Nikonov] What book is the text from? do you know? It turns out I got this image from Twitter. So I don’t know.Jul 17, 2018 11:02amKevin FenchakWhy We Fight by Guillame FayeJul 17, 2018 12:35pmKevin FenchakHis “metapolitical dictionary”Jul 17, 2018 12:35pmDale MillerHISTORY REPEATING ITSELF ! WOW 😮Jul 17, 2018 6:35pmMirko LopezLots of luck! America is a diverse, multi ethnic and multi racial society. It works just fine. Get over it!Jul 18, 2018 6:33pmKarl SchmidtYeaJul 21, 2018 1:21amARISTOTLE’S ETHNOCENTRISM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:08:00 UTC

  • GOOD PROPAGANDA MUST BE TRUE via Cole Williams —“… Good propaganda does not

    GOOD PROPAGANDA MUST BE TRUE

    via Cole Williams

    —“… Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that the people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run. A good propaganda will always come along that serves a good cause. But propaganda is still necessary if a good cause is to succeed. A good idea does not win simply because it is good. It must be presented properly if it is to win. The combination makes for the best propaganda. Such propaganda is successful without being obnoxious. It depends on its nature, not its methods. It works without being noticed. Its goals are inherent in its nature. Since it is almost invisible, it is effective and powerful. A good cause will lose to a bad one if it depends only on its rightness, while the other side uses the methods of influencing the masses. We are, for example, firmly convinced that we fought the war for a good cause, but that was not enough. The world should also have known and seen that our cause was good. However, we lacked the effective means of mass propaganda to make that clear to the world. Marxism certainly did not fight for great ideals. Despite that, in November 1918 it overcame Kaiser, Reich, and the army because it was superior in the art of mass propaganda…” – Dr. Joseph Goebbels.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:04:00 UTC

  • “If you worship your enemy, you are defeated. If you adopt your enemy’s religion

    —“If you worship your enemy, you are defeated. If you adopt your enemy’s religion, you are enslaved. If you breed with your enemy, you are destroyed.” — Polydoros of Sparta


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 15:38:00 UTC

  • Adam. How many people know you well enough to understand your journey over the p

    Adam. How many people know you well enough to understand your journey over the past twenty years? I mean. I’ve known you since maybe… 2010 at most? No one can accuse you ever of having a fixed perspective, or not experimenting with what life has to offer. I mean. damn. You’ve sort of explored it all. And that’s what makes your observations so interesting.

    (To Adam’s friends: I love this man, and he has a depth of character that I’m envious of.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 15:11:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PHILOSOPHY? 1) To develop mental fitness and distance fro

    WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PHILOSOPHY?

    1) To develop mental fitness and distance from our impulses (to develop agency)

    2) To accumulate an inventory of human errors and bias so that we do not make them in our own lives, and are not affected by others who employ them.

    3) To survey the sets of myths and paradigms (stories we tell ourselves) such that we can choose goals in our lives.

    4) (the bad part) to find a verbal means of achieving some degree of the mindfulness that is trainable through religion(mythology), ritual (prayer or repetitious action), and self authoring (stoicism – a ritual), and meditation (a ritual in and of itself). Mindfuless serves as a sedative for animal impulse, without the soporific affect of chemicals

    that interfere with processing in general..

    As far as I know that is the end of philosophy. The rest is just left to religion(nonsense/lies) or science (decidability/truth).

    Nearly all of the corpus of philosophy is reducible to fantasy moral literature (french), or fantasy psychological Literature (german), fantasy pseudoscientific literature (ashkenazi), or the attempt to develop scientific versions of those fields (english, American.)

    The problem with science, law proper, and truth proper is that in matters of the personal and social we are not ambivalent neutral surveyors of the material – but seek only personal and group advantage in whatever we can filter from it to advance our interests.

    Yet science and truth are uncomfortable and dehumanizing.

    So to no small degree, philosophy is PRACTICED as the pseudoscience and pseudo-rationalism of finding excuses that comfort us given our genetic, social, economic, cultural, and temporal conditions without relying on the demands easily falsified and supernatural faith.

    In other words, like religion, it’s therapeutic self medication – sedation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 15:02:00 UTC