Source: Facebook

  • We can even reduce the causal origin of civilizational strategies, as (a) the mi

    We can even reduce the causal origin of civilizational strategies, as (a) the military aristocracy against the body – state, (b) the military body for itself – law, or (c) the religious body against the military body – faith.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-03 18:21:00 UTC

  • “I Choose My Moments”– (sister) My sister is a flawless , archetypal, stoic, es

    —“I Choose My Moments”– (sister)

    My sister is a flawless , archetypal, stoic, especially for a woman. Rarely states anything, private or judgemental. When she does it’s a surprise. I state it’s uncharacteristic. Her response, “I choose my moments”. Another soic response.

    Not all women can be trained to be stoics. But those that are, are priceless.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-03 17:58:00 UTC

  • I’ve posted two articles on our website today – both that were written for quora

    I’ve posted two articles on our website today – both that were written for quora, and both have to do with differences in civlizational strategies. But they are too ‘inappropriate’ for facebook’s guidelines.

    1 – Q: Why is Western civilization the only one worthy of leading humanity?

    2 – Q: Chinese First? Europe Fastest: Chinese vs European Civilizations

    CONTEXT

    I think some of you might have noticed that I’m working with the theory put forth by Piaget and Fukuyama that the order in which civilizations develop their institutions determines the long term priority of the cognitive framework of the societies.

    I’ve expanded my work on (chapter on) group strategies to include this insight and am revising the criticism of abrahamism in particular (semitic religion first, vs european law first, vs chines state first) to reflect these insights.

    I think when I’m a little closer to done you’ll feel the work on comparative civilizations is as complete as the work on testimony and ethics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-03 14:03:00 UTC

  • THE ECONOMICS OF WHITENESS “Whiteness is just a technology; you can use it or no

    THE ECONOMICS OF WHITENESS

    “Whiteness is just a technology; you can use it or not.”

    – Curt Doolittle

    Thoughts

    by James Krieger

    Whiteness (Europeanism) is a technology, yes, just as damns are technology. However, adoption & maintenance costs vary across human subspecies, & since the gains are incurred largely as a function of time, there is very little incentive for certain subspecies to adopt Europeanism – particularly subspecies known for hyperbolic discounting.

    Europeanism as technology does have the advantage of framing failure as a product of choice—‘the technology is there why don’t you use it?’

    However, I think europeanism is more appropriately framed as an extended phenotype, just as damns are the product of beaver’s genetic information. It shifts the moral conversation from specifying & allocating blame for the failure to one of unapologetic commitment to ourselves & our mission:

    “We have no other choice than to be excellent. You are either coming along, contributing & carrying your own weight, or we will forcibly separate to remove the civilizational, institutional, economic, demographic drag.”

    As such:

    By @[100002194619079:2048:Joel Landoe]

    “The apparent privileges allegedly enjoyed by only one ethnicity (per social cartels, media etc) – Europeans – are due to an inequality of institutions, traditions, norms, paradigms, knowledge, values, resources, and goals [technology] that when applied in combination can be used by any person regardless of age, race, gender, or status for maximum self-actualization and development of good society.”

    Scientifically:

    By Curt Doolittle

    Only Europeans, and specifically male, conservative, and libertarian Europeans, paid the high cost, and counterintuitive cost, of discovering, adapting to, and applying the physical(material), biological (evolutionary), social (cooperative), laws of the universe, in thought, word, and deed, across the spectrum: personally, socially, economically, politically, militarily, and strategically (expansion, colonization, conquest).

    As such whiteness is a technology. It is a costly technology. It is paid for like all technologies. And the results are acquired at high cost no others are willing to pay.

    Evidentiary, warranted, warrantable Truth, reciprocity in display word and deed, competition in the service of others for survival by market adversity, meritocratic outcome in markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, common, polities, and most of all eugenic constraint on reproduction by test of meritocratic outcome – all of which are performed regardless of cost – are costs only Europeans evolved to bear.

    And even such only possible in the lesser classes by training in Christian exhaustive payment of psychological costs as virtuous contribution to the commons, and worthy of status even without intellectual, economic, political, and military success.

    As such only European lower classes were slowly reduced in number, and reduced in cost, providing the counterintuitive excellence of western civilization: our Christian underclass, laboring classes, working classes, and lower-middle classes do the world’s least harm, while middle and upper classes do the world’s most good.

    The counter-intuitive explanation for the three great ages of European success vs all other competing civilizations is that Europeans deviate the least from the laws of the universe and pay high costs for doing so but achieve the extraordinary returns for those investments.

    So Europeans are not privileged. We merely pay the extraordinary costs that others do not. Ergo others who come and don’t are thieves.Updated Sep 4, 2020, 10:32 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-03 13:17:00 UTC

  • Updated Sep 2, 2020, 10:56 AM

    Updated Sep 2, 2020, 10:56 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-02 10:56:00 UTC

  • “Whiteness is just a technology; you can use it or not.” – Curt Doolittle OP: Ho

    “Whiteness is just a technology; you can use it or not.”

    – Curt Doolittle

    OP: https://www.facebook.com/brandon.hayes.5851/posts/10104045851547971

    However, we’re going to keep using that technology even if you don’t;).

    (repost via Brandon Hayes)Updated Sep 2, 2020, 10:56 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-02 10:56:00 UTC

  • NATIONALISM IS A FRAUD (THIS IS SPOT ON) via Gerald Predmore Sep 2, 2020, 10:55

    https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/civic_nationalism_fraudCIVIC NATIONALISM IS A FRAUD (THIS IS SPOT ON)

    via Gerald Predmore

    https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/civic_nationalism_fraudUpdated Sep 2, 2020, 10:55 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-02 10:55:00 UTC

  • You don’t understand. If information is a good, and a service, then deplatformin

    You don’t understand. If information is a good, and a service, then deplatforming is cartelling. Yep. And that’s where we’re going. …. Cartels.

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-02 07:55:00 UTC

  • SCOPE OF ONE PERSON’S INFLUENCE Sep 1, 2020, 9:52 AM

    https://thewillcountynews.com/install/index.php/2020/01/11/complete-list-of-u-s-organizations-funded-by-george-soros/THE SCOPE OF ONE PERSON’S INFLUENCE

    https://thewillcountynews.com/install/index.php/2020/01/11/complete-list-of-u-s-organizations-funded-by-george-soros/Updated Sep 1, 2020, 9:52 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-01 09:52:00 UTC

  • EVOLUTION IS JUST CALCULATION AND IT”S FAST The universe appears to be construct

    EVOLUTION IS JUST CALCULATION AND IT”S FAST

    The universe appears to be constructed in binary at different frequencies. The frequencies in four bits producing eight dimensions of over two hundred possibilities. The fundamental forces out of four. All matter is constructed of only thee computable bits. All life in only four bits. And we write software with 16 bits just to make it easier for us to comprehend. The C language has only 32 keywords. We write all the English language in 26 bits (characters). We speak English language with only 44 sounds. And speech is infinitely calculable (unlimited).

    We can calculate by speech and organize our behavior. But that’s just an extension of every combination in evolutionary history.

    Bacteria (prokaryotes) reproduce (divide) between once every 12 minutes and once every 24 hours. And so the average lifespan of a bacterium is around 12 hours or so.

    Bacteria have between 130 kbp to over 14 Mbp. And while Eukaryotes (with nucleus) generally use point mutations, while prokaryotes (bacteria etc w/o nucleus) can capture or discard entire genes (sets).

    There are typically 40 million bacterial cells in a gram of soil and a million bacterial cells in a millilitre of fresh water. There are approximately 5×1030 bacteria on Earth, forming a biomass which exceeds that of all plants and animals.

    Errors in replication (reproduction) are random, with longer genomes having more opportunities for change. (number of computations)

    Errors in replication occur in parallel (parallel computation)

    Sexual Reproduction Rapidly Increases sharing of new genomes (recombinant computation.)

    Sexual SELECTION rapidly increases sharing of new beneficial genomes.

    As life evolves in complexity the rate of evolution increases. But we trade off rates of reproduction (bacteria) for energy consumption (advanced life).

    So no. the universe produces a hierarchy of increasingly complex combinatorics (combinations) from energetic vibrations to sub-particles, to particles to elements, to molecules, to bio-molecules, organelle, cells, tissues, organs, systems, organisms, sentience, awareness, consciousness, speech, and calculates in massively parallel, and recombines gains in entropy (energy), through reproduction (communication, transfer), at rates that are terrifyingly rapid.

    The simple neural cells in your body from your nerves to your brain come in just three variations from minuscule granule cells to terribly long (toe to brain) nerve cells. Your brain is able to sense, perceive integrate, and predict the world around you, and then choose alternative predictions (imaginations) by using 100 billion neurons and trillions and trillions of dendrites in massive parallel.

    There are about 54 regions neo cortex composed of 1,000,000–2,000,000 cortical columns, each composed of 100,000,000 cortical minicolumns with up to 110 neurons each, together having 100,000,000,000 neurons, with about 1000 dendrites per neuron and 1000 synapses per neuron or ~1.5×10^14 synapses.

    And there are billions of people on this earth. And look what we are calculating and acting, to change the universe together.

    So massive parallelization and massive computation even by random error calculate absurdly fast, in general producing great leaps when a new opportunity is exploited by evolution.

    So no. Life forms very quickly just like all molecules form very quickly because it’s all just parallel computation by trial and error calculating improvements in the capture of energy from entropy, and then distributing that new technology by reproduction.

    Billions if not trillions of parallel computations ever few minutes to hours by every single organism, recombining through asexual capture of sexual reproduction to compute increasingly superior means of capturing energy.

    It will happen wherever it can as fast as it can and it’s fast.

    It’s trivially easy for the universe to produce life IF it has the time. The problem appears to be that the vast majority of the universe is an irradiated wasteland. So it’s not even vaguely surprising that life and advanced life evolve – it’s as deterministic as gravity. What’s surprising is that there is a spot in this galaxy that’s dying already that isn’t an irradiated wasteland. I mean, a safe place in the galactic suburbs, between spiral arms, a certain kind of sun, a certain distance, a Jupiter to protect us, a moon to keep the core liquid, and a liquid core that protects us from radiation.

    Life requires:

    Available Energy (the sweet spot)

    The Capture and storage of energy

    Growth (transformation of energy)

    Reproduction (reproduction of transformation of energy)

    Reaction to the world around it (‘irritability’)

    There are no problems with Darwinism. None. Zero. It’s just calculation.

    BTW: the moron at yale who last came up with this nonsense-argument is a theologian not a mathematician biologist or physicist – or even philosopher.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-01 09:32:00 UTC