Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Um. I live in Ukraine. It’s not like I’m hidi

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Um. I live in Ukraine. It’s not like I’m hiding…. But yes I use my own domestic proxy servers. Don’t bother.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 20:09:20 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle wrote on Kelly Nosliw’s timeline. ( sorry man, accidentally block

    Curt Doolittle wrote on Kelly Nosliw’s timeline.

    ( sorry man, accidentally blocked you for a couple of minutes while trying to block the moron. thanks for the backup. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 19:42:55 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. I have picked up a new herd of trolls. (Doug

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    I have picked up a new herd of trolls.

    (Doug Mensheisen > Antifa)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 18:36:18 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“One of your recent posts inspired me to l

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“One of your recent posts inspired me to learn more about Western Civilization before Christianity. I’m wondering, do you have any reading suggestions you could give me?”—-

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 18:30:38 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a video. MIGHT DOES MAKE WHAT EXISTS WHETHER OR NOT IT IS

    Curt Doolittle shared a video.

    MIGHT DOES MAKE WHAT EXISTS WHETHER OR NOT IT IS RIGHT (RECIPROCAL). WE HAVE CONQUERED ONE ANOTHER SINCE THE BEGINNING OF OUR SPECIES.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 18:21:45 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. WE need a course on kings. there arent really

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    WE need a course on kings. there arent really that many

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 18:06:44 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. DO IT —“I’ve gotten in the habit of checkin

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    DO IT
    —“I’ve gotten in the habit of checking the last name of the author of everything I read. It’s helped tremendously.”—Darren O’Connor

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 18:05:55 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Hey Curt, I’ve got a question for you. I

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Hey Curt, I’ve got a question for you. I was wondering what your thoughts are on the abrahamic concepts of “sin” and “evil”. What are sin and evil to the Aryan, and how is it relevant to natural law?”— A Friend

    Um. Well, sin is nonsense right? The accumulation of knowledge of your possibility of exposure and punishment is not nonsense, because it is inevitably written on our face and in your body language and in how people treat you. So the only equivalent would be your Character (virtues).

    As to evil, the ancient meaning remains correct: Transgression (aggression against, imposition against)

    —“The modern English word evil (Old English yfel) and its cognates such as the German Übel and Dutch euvel are widely considered to come from a Proto-Germanic reconstructed form of *ubilaz, comparable to the Hittite huwapp- ultimately from the Proto-Indo-European form *wap- and suffixed zero-grade form *up-elo-. Other later Germanic forms include Middle English evel, ifel, ufel, Old Frisian evel (adjective and noun), Old Saxon ubil, Old High German ubil, and Gothic ubils. The root meaning of the word is of obscure origin though shown[7] to be akin to modern German Das Übel (although evil is normally translated as Das Böse) with the basic idea of transgressing.[8]”—

    I distinguish the following:
    || good > amoral > exchange > criminal > unethical > immoral > evil

    Where Evil refers to intending harm without even profiting from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 17:55:33 UTC

  • Markets are advocated under the presumption that in a world without government i

    https://www.quora.com/Do-free-market-policies-help-poor-countries/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=046bc1f0&srid=u4Qvhttps://www.quora.com/Do-free-market-policies-help-poor-countries/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=046bc1f0&srid=u4QvFree Markets are advocated under the presumption that in a world without government interference **comparative advantage** will provide the optimum market for goods, services, and information to everyone.

    However, this doesn’t turn out to be true.

    Free-Market is a code word for:

    1 – all government non-interference trade by taxation.

    2 – all governmental non-interference in trade by policy

    3 – socialist government interference in the organization of production, distribution, and trade.

    In the **developing world**, this translates to:

    1 – on one hand, ‘the reduction and elimination of corruption’ and

    2 – on the other hand ‘the privatization of common resources’ by internal members, and ‘the exploitation of common resources’ by outside members.

    In the **Developed World** translates to:

    1- Forcing all post-war nations to grant human (natural) rights (property rights), rather than territorial expansion (growth by warfare).

    2 – Forcing all post-war nations to compete entirely by meritocratic production distribution and trade, so that survival is dependent upon being a good market citizen of the world, thus reducing the chances of another world war.

    3 – (Failed Hypothesis) By encouraging democracy (which appears to have been a universal disaster) citizens both 1 and 2 will be brought to bear out of citizen’s self interest. (Despite the fact that communism and islamism are hostile to meritocracy.)

    **This is America’s postwar policy in a nutshell.**

    Add to this policy the unstated threat that ‘*You can Choose your own government under democracy but if you choose poorly we will punish you so severely that you’ll be back in the stone age.*”

    The problem is that America promotes the CARROT but doesn’t mention the STICK. And it turns out that Authoritarian State Capitalism, which is just monarchy at greater scale, is superior to democracy in every case OTHER than small homogenous protestant nation states where everyone is a sixth cousin at the outside.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 17:53:00 UTC

  • Markets are advocated under the presumption that in a world without government i

    https://www.quora.com/Do-free-market-policies-help-poor-countries/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=046bc1f0&srid=u4QvFree Markets are advocated under the presumption that in a world without government interference **comparative advantage** will provide the optimum market for goods, services, and information to everyone.

    However, this doesn’t turn out to be true.

    Free-Market is a code word for:

    1 – all government non-interference trade by taxation.

    2 – all governmental non-interference in trade by policy

    3 – socialist government interference in the organization of production, distribution, and trade.

    In the **developing world**, this translates to:

    1 – on one hand, ‘the reduction and elimination of corruption’ and

    2 – on the other hand ‘the privatization of common resources’ by internal members, and ‘the exploitation of common resources’ by outside members.

    In the **Developed World** translates to:

    1- Forcing all post-war nations to grant human (natural) rights (property rights), rather than territorial expansion (growth by warfare).

    2 – Forcing all post-war nations to compete entirely by meritocratic production distribution and trade, so that survival is dependent upon being a good market citizen of the world, thus reducing the chances of another world war.

    3 – (Failed Hypothesis) By encouraging democracy (which appears to have been a universal disaster) citizens both 1 and 2 will be brought to bear out of citizen’s self interest. (Despite the fact that communism and islamism are hostile to meritocracy.)

    **This is America’s postwar policy in a nutshell.**

    Add to this policy the unstated threat that ‘*You can Choose your own government under democracy but if you choose poorly we will punish you so severely that you’ll be back in the stone age.*”

    The problem is that America promotes the CARROT but doesn’t mention the STICK. And it turns out that Authoritarian State Capitalism, which is just monarchy at greater scale, is superior to democracy in every case OTHER than small homogenous protestant nation states where everyone is a sixth cousin at the outside.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 17:53:00 UTC