Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Persistent Hollywood Propaganda is the re

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Persistent Hollywood Propaganda is the result of who owns Hollywood, and the voices and bodies that are given power within it. It’s been a clear revelation this last year that they are not given power without requirements. But we continue to pretend this is not so.”— A Friend.

    ie: End copyright and replace it with creative commons and hollywood dies an economic death, along with the mainstream media. Why do we grant exceptional protection and therefore subsidy to the very people who work against our civilization?

    If we end copyright subsidies and make propaganda (falsehood and immorality) involuntarily warrantied and therefore liable in the commons, then Hollywood and major media will die.

    If we eliminate consumer interest and borrow direct from the treasury, insured by anyone with a license, then new york will die, and LA cannot be funded.

    (I do these things for reasons)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 15:01:36 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 14:48:40 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“The nanny state is discouraged, even prev

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“The nanny state is discouraged, even prevented, from raising adults. They need lifelong children who need their parenting.”— A Friend

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 14:41:26 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. ART AND NATURAL LAW Since art is fictional, a

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    ART AND NATURAL LAW
    Since art is fictional, and therefore analogical, we judge it by its morality first and truthfulness second. If a hero is a marxist it’s immoral. If it promoted abrahamism and marxism it’s immoral. it it misrepresents history it’s immoral. If it’s fiction and it claims to be, and it’s not immoral then it’s neither false nor immoral.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 14:39:25 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Retweeted Klivanophoros (@klivanophoros): @cu

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Retweeted Klivanophoros (@klivanophoros):

    @curtdoolittle the ancient world knew about actors. they kept them at the same level as whores and criminals. now we worship them.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 14:26:56 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. (My mother had blonde hair with brown eyebrow

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (My mother had blonde hair with brown eyebrows until her twenties. My sister is blonde. I had blonde hair as a child, that rapidly went brown. My father had blonde hair as a child that rapidly went brown. Maternal grandfather was blonde but matured to dark blonde. Maternal grandmother brown. Paternal grandmother and grandfather light brown. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 14:25:58 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. YES. AN INQUISITION Yeah. To some degree I wa

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    YES. AN INQUISITION

    Yeah. To some degree I want to make Truth and Natural Law a Cult – an extremely intolerant cult. A judicial priesthood. An Inquisition of Truth. Because that is the origin of western civilization: truth regardless of consequences.

    A militant, intolerante, prosecutorial, expansionist, inquisition.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 14:11:01 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. TRUTH IS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR THE DEMO

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    TRUTH IS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR THE DEMONSTRABLY SUPERIOR.

    I just argue that truth is also a signal and that superior peoples can in fact use truth for the same purposes (and in general they have). And it’s most important that while inferior groups can use falsehoods, only superior groups can use truth.

    Truth is a competitive advantage.

    (The opposite is also true. Falsehood is a competitive advantage for the demonstrably inferior.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 14:07:22 UTC

  • FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively eva

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssahttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssaPUNISHING FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY

    —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—

    (Via James Santagata)

    “Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 13:57:00 UTC

  • FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively eva

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssaPUNISHING FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY

    —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—

    (Via @[525087895:2048:James Santagata])

    “Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 13:57:00 UTC