Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • (a) there is no god other than the fictions we create as false appeals to author

    (a) there is no god other than the fictions we create as false appeals to authority that justify our ignorance. Gandalf is as much a god as zeus/jupiter, jeohva or allah – and noticeably of better character. Authur has been more influential on the common anglo man than jesus. In my understanding Aristotle is the father of western thought and his works (those that were not destroyed by the christians and muslims and jews) the only bible (book of wisdom) worth reading. The combination of aristotle, zeno, epicurious, and the stoics constitute the western tradition in rational form.

    (b) there is no infinite regress, since time has no meaning outside of any given universe. As far as we know the universe(s) are just bubbles of space-time constantly in disequilibrium, and existence has no meaning outside of a universe. To state that the universe must be temporally intuitive to man contradicts the findings of the sciences – both at pre and post human scales. We have consistently found that our presumptions of causality are counter to anthropological and anthropomorphic intuitions.

    (c) natural law (reciprocity) is an evolutionary necessity for any species that evolves the capacity for sympathetic, voluntary, cooperation. All other strategies are contrary to survival.

    (d) evidence is that all groups rely on reciprocity for the simple reason that it is universally decidable in matters of cooperation and conflict.

    (e) ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy given all other known and hypothesized strategies.

    (f) markets are the optimum group evolutionary strategy given all other known and hypothesized strategies.

    (g) markets accelerate with the continuous expansion of the suppression of parasitism under the the natural law of reciprocity.

    As far as I know these are logical necessiteis that have been demonstrated empirically (evidentially) in competition against alternatives.

    NO MORE LIES. NO MORE ABRAHAMISM.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 12:44:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a memory

    Curt Doolittle shared a memory.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 12:30:55 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://twitter.com/SRCHicks/status/1019584761788956673/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=SRCHicks&utm_content=1019584761788956673https://twitter.com/SRCHicks/status/1019584761788956673/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=SRCHicks&utm_content=1019584761788956673

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 10:29:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://twitter.com/SRCHicks/status/1019584761788956673/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=SRCHicks&utm_content=1019584761788956673

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 10:29:00 UTC

  • RUSSIA’S FIELD TEST OF CHINESE TREASURY LIQUIDATION (ie: imho it’s paper tiger)

    RUSSIA’S FIELD TEST OF CHINESE TREASURY LIQUIDATION

    (ie: imho it’s paper tiger)

    —“In other words, in just two months, Russia sold a whopping $81BN in treasurys, a liquidation flow that was likely responsible for much if not all the blow out in rates over the period. Because what else happened as Russia was liquidating 85% of its Treasury holdings in 2 months? 10Y yields soared from 2.7% at the start of April to the 7 year high of 3.11% in late May. … So … we can’t help but wonder – as the Yuan-denominated oil futures were launched, trade wars were threatened, and as more sanctions were unleashed on Russia – if this wasn’t a dress-rehearsal, carefully coordinated with Beijing to field test what would happen if/when China also starts to liquidate its own Treasury holdings.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 10:04:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 09:06:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a memory

    Curt Doolittle shared a memory.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 08:30:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. Thanks for the Ask to Answer. THE CORRECT AND ANSW

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    Thanks for the Ask to Answer.

    THE CORRECT AND ANSWER: ITS SIMPLE.

    Anglo Empiricism evolved from Law; Science evolved from Empiricism; and Anglo Analytic philosophy evolved from Science. It’s continuously deflationary. Anglo analytic philosophy attempted to develop Decidability (Truth)

    Continental Philosophy evolved from Literature. It is conflationary. Seeking to provide Wisdom (Good)

    The only ‘enlightenment’ was the Anglo empirical. The rest of the continent (French, German, Jewish, and Russian) retaliated against the empirical enlightenment with literature that attempted to preserve the authority of church and state in secular prose, using the method of argument and values of the nation(culture) of the authors that produced them. French Maternal Authoritarianism, German Duty, Ashkenazi Separatism, and Russian Nihilism.

    Continental philosophy is best categorized as Wisdom Literature: Literary Moral Fictionalism. (Plato)

    Anglo analytic philosophy is best categorized as Law: Science of Testimony. (Aristotle)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 02:56:18 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. MAGICAL THINKING –“Magical thinking is the a

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    MAGICAL THINKING

    –“Magical thinking is the attribution of causal or synchronistic relationships between actions and events which seemingly cannot be justified by reason and observation. In religion, folk religion, and superstitious beliefs, the posited correlation is often between religious ritual, prayer, sacrifice, or the observance of a taboo, and an expected benefit or recompense.”–

    As you move east and south this seems to increases rapidly

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 01:09:43 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. IT”S JUST DEMOGRAPHICS. WE CAN ALL TRANSCEND

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    IT”S JUST DEMOGRAPHICS. WE CAN ALL TRANSCEND

    I’m going to repeat this again: The marginal differences between groups – differences that are non-trivial – are by and large the result of the size of our underclasses. It will be hard to produce Chinese memories, to produce ashkenazi speech, or to produce White creativity. But we don’t know what will emerge in other groups once they reduce the size of their underclasses and express their excellences.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 00:50:42 UTC