Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE COMPLETE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS 1 – The Decla

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE COMPLETE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS

    1 – The Declaration contains the appeal to Natural Law as justification for secession(independence).

    2 – The Bill of Rights codifies the natural law as they enumerated those rights at the time.

    3 – The Constitution describes the organization and processes of the government.

    I tend to tell people to read them in that order: Declaration, Bill of Rights, and Constitution: from the reason for the secession: violation of natural law, to the articulation of the specific defenses of it, to the institutions that protect it yet still allow for the production of commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 23:30:47 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. TWO IMPORTANT POSTS ON RULE OF LAW 1) RULE OF

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    TWO IMPORTANT POSTS ON RULE OF LAW

    1) RULE OF LAW – THE SPECTRUM OF WHAT IS AND ISN’T
    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156509147362264

    2) THE WEAKNESS IN THE RULE OF LAW: THE SUPREME COURT
    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156510056397264

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 23:30:15 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 23:16:10 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. WHITE NATIONALISM IS RIDICULOUS. NATIONALISM

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    WHITE NATIONALISM IS RIDICULOUS. NATIONALISM ISN’T

    When say that you are a White Nationalist your not solving the problem: building a worldwide movement, exiting leftists (defectors) from the gene pool, and saving another 5000 years of costly eugenics. We know we’ve spent 3500 years or more on eugenic evolution by cultural design, and it’s possible much more than that by accident. There is no need for a monopoly and to dominate. It’s not helpful. So voluntary separation is all that is necessary. And race is an insufficient criteria.

    The only thing that matters is voluntary association and disassociation. The markets for polities will solve everything for us just as all markets solve all other issues for us.

    Why? We can afford to produce commons that suit the genetic interests of different groups. So rather than fight an impossible fight, lets just serve one another’s interests.

    Serve EVERYONE’s political interests.

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    ====== UPDATE ======
    Funny that some people understand propaganda and some don’t. I have this suspicion that what makes our people fragile, is that we have been performing truth to power for so many thousands of years that it’s in our genes, and that is why we are both susceptible to propaganda and bad at making it.

    WN is Bad Prop. Nationalism and commons preferred by each group is GOOD prop. Good prop makes allies. Bad prop creates resistance.

    The simple and direct route is the one that is predictable. Great generals maneuver: they let the opponent take the direct route and take the indirect route to defeat them.

    The psychological drive for directness is male aggression. This is why some people fight physically, others legally, others politically, and others informationally.

    WN is bad Prop. Universal Nationalism to foster group flourishing is Good Prop.

    Help everyone to help ourselves.

    The bigger ambition provides the shortest distance and duration.

    ===== UPDATE ====

    NATIONALISM
    – ethnocentrism is the optimum group political strategy.
    – markets the optimum economic strategy.
    – eugenics the optimum group competitive strategy.
    – neoteny the optimum genetic strategy.

    ===== UPDATE ====

    THE DEAD END RIGHT: WN
    W.N. is a dead end. Nationalism is not.
    National Socialism is a dead end. Redistribution is not.
    Religion is Dead End. Institutional models are not.
    Takeover is a dead end. Separatism is not.
    Demonstrations are a dead end. Direct action is not.
    Solving your problem is a dead end. Solving everyone’s is not.
    Ideology is a dead end. Economics Incentives Are Not.

    THE SOLUTIONS MOVEMENTS NEED
    All revolutions occur because of a convergence between:
    (a) the state’s inability to modify it’s behavior to serve the diverging interests of the public.
    (b) a common knowledge of an alternative condition (order) that would be preferable,
    (c) a surplus of males that are agitated by this condition,
    (d) an economic or political event that provides opportunity for collective action that can ‘spiral’ (increase in momentum).

    REALITIES OF MOVEMENTS
    The early adopters seek the fringe. The population seeks an Overton Window. As movements age, they upgrade members from the fringe to the Overton Window: Fringe personalities perform research for talented personalities that perform research for mainstream personalities.

    We have better followers this year than last.
    We had better followers last year than the year before.
    We had better followers the year before last, than the year before … and so on.

    I don’t want to associate with the fringe that hinders capture of the Overton Window. They are a dead end. All that matters is the people who will fight, resist, advocate, or not get in the way. And those people will be captured by economic and cultural incentives – not ideology.

    REVOLUTION
    A moral License.
    A set of Demands.
    A plan of Transition.
    A means of raising the cost of the status quo.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 22:58:47 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE PROPER METHOD FOR THE SUPREME COURT’S DEC

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE PROPER METHOD FOR THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISIONS

    —” the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers mandates that judges anchor their analysis to the text as reasonably understood by the people of the time. If that leads to a violation of Reciprocity (Natural Law), then the proper avenue for redress is to amend the constitution so the text better and better codifies Reciprocity (Natural Law).”—

    I assume, and the minority of strict jurists assume that the founding documents consist of The Declaration, The Constitution, and The Bill of Rights. And if clarity of original intent is required then we resort to The Federalist Papers, or notes on the proceeds of the debate. Once the bill of rights was ratified, then the founding documents were complete.

    1 – The Declaration contains the appeal to Natural Law as justification for secession(independence).

    2 – The Bill of Rights codifies the natural law as they enumerated those rights at the time.

    3 – The Constitution describes the organization and processes of the government.

    I tend to tell people to read them in that order: Declaration, Bill of Rights, and Constitution: from the reason for the secession: violation of natural law, to the articulation of the specific defenses of it, to the institutions that protect it yet still allow for the production of commons.

    Unfortunately, first, reciprocity is not specifically stated as the first rule of natural law. Second, there is no requirement that the judiciary certify the constitutionality of legislation, and instead, all legislation ascends until falsified by the court. In other words, the market tests the legislation, and if conflicts arise the court corrects legislation.

    This approach continues the no-prior-restraint of the Anglo Saxon (Germanic) law versus the prior-restraint of continental (french and roman) law. And this is yet another example of ‘markets in everything’.

    Worse, without specifying Reciprocity, there is no means by which the initial rights can be limited, and therefore no means by which the court can limit the grant of rights rather than permissions and obligations.

    Worse, there are no means by which the court can return the legislation to the legislature and demand correction. Nor are there means by which the court can suggest corrections or amendments to rectify the deficiency, and return to the legislature.

    As such the court must, as the president must, choose ‘line item veto’ so to speak, or to veto the entire piece of legislation. So that is what the court does.

    And the court members use different criteria for determining the power of the legislature:
    1- Rule of Law (Substantive) in which the legislature and the people may only act in concert with natural law (reciprocity), or ;
    2-Rule by Law (Formalist) in which the legislature can do what it wants;
    3-Rule by Law (Majoritarian), in which the people can do whatever they want.

    In other words, there are always at least THREE parties to a matter before the court: Plaintiff, Defendant, and Legislature. And the court cannot demand remedy of the legislature. And that is the oversight.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 22:52:22 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Every time one of you ‘gets’ some part or oth

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Every time one of you ‘gets’ some part or other (Bill just blew my mind) I feel elated. Why? Unless you’ve been following me for years, you don’t know how hard I worked to make this understandable, and when you understand it’s proof I (we together) can.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 22:35:57 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. IS LEFTISM A DISEASE? WE ARE SPECIATING (divi

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    IS LEFTISM A DISEASE? WE ARE SPECIATING
    (dividing into species)

    —“Curt do you think that leftism is simply a mental illness or is there an actual reason why people adopt such an unreasonable belief system?”—

    I think it’s a pre-cognitive genetic (evolutionary) strategy that some people have evolved just as conservatism is a genetic (evolutionary) strategy that others have evolved.

    And I think the difference is caused by the female reproductive strategy that favors women and the lower classes, and male reproductive strategy that favors males and the middle/upper classes.

    And this is confirmed pretty simply by the reproductive attractiveness of conservatives and liberals. Conservatives tend to be more reproductively desirable, and have greater agency. These are genetic markers.

    My view is that we WERE speciating regionally by race when we discovered metalworking.

    My view is that we are wealthy enough to speciate by need for commons – and that’s what we are in the process of doing.

    And that the mistake is to think that our interests are better served by the production of COMPROMISE commons versus SPECIALIZED COMMONS that suit our reproductive strategies.

    All peoples are better served by the production of SPECIALIZED COMMONS. And we can (finally) afford to produce them.

    And that is what we see across the world.

    WE NEED TO SPECIATE.

    WOLVES(conservatives) Packs, and SHEEP(liberals) Herd.

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 22:13:28 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. UNPLEASANT TRUTHS THE DEAD END RIGHT W.N. is

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    UNPLEASANT TRUTHS

    THE DEAD END RIGHT
    W.N. is a dead end. Nationalism is not.
    National Socialism is a dead end. Redistribution is not.
    Religion is Dead End. Institutional models are not.
    Takeover is a dead end. Separatism is not.
    Demonstrations are a dead end. Direct action is not.
    Solving your problem is a dead end. Solving everyone’s is not.
    Ideology is a dead end. Economics Incentives Are Not.

    THE SOLUTIONS MOVEMENTS NEED
    All revolutions occur because of a convergence between:
    (a) the state’s inability to modify it’s behavior to serve the diverging interests of the public.
    (b) a common knowledge of an alternative condition (order) that would be preferable,
    (c) a surplus of males that are agitated by this condition,
    (d) an economic or political event that provides opportunity for collective action that can ‘spiral’ (increase in momentum).

    REALITIES OF MOVEMENTS
    The early adopters seek the fringe. The population seeks an Overton Window. As movements age, they upgrade members from the fringe to the Overton Window: Fringe personalities perform research for talented personalities that perform research for mainstream personalities.

    We have better followers this year than last.
    We had better followers last year than the year before.
    We had better followers the year before last, than the year before … and so on.

    I don’t want to associate with the fringe that hinders capture of the Overton Window. They are a dead end. All that matters is the people who will fight, resist, advocate, or not get in the way. And those people will be captured by economic and cultural incentives – not ideology.

    REVOLUTION
    A moral License.
    A set of Demands.
    A plan of Transition.
    A means of raising the cost of the status quo.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 21:54:22 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. (Quote of the Day) —“I don’t agree that phy

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (Quote of the Day)

    —“I don’t agree that physical violence is always the answer, but thats only because I prefer to mentally violate people who cant be reasoned with.”— A Female Friend

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 21:12:02 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/israel-jewish-state-law-formalizing-common-understanding/https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/israel-jewish-state-law-formalizing-common-understanding/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 20:42:00 UTC