Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • (Little old lady still smack-talking from across the house. No idea what she’s s

    (Little old lady still smack-talking from across the house. No idea what she’s saying. Probably something about the mess she made of her self eating the ribs I made for dinner. Me: “You keep talking to yourself we’re gonna put you in a home.”. Her: “Ha. Put you in a home with padded walls and a jacket first.” More mumbling. See? I suffer constant verbal assault from a cocky rotund 5′ Weeble, on an O2 leash. Every once in a while I sing “Weeeeebles wobble, but they don’t fall down …. (yet).” lol )

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 20:33:00 UTC

  • (Little old lady’s birthday today. So she feels she has the privilege to trash t

    (Little old lady’s birthday today. So she feels she has the privilege to trash talk. And she’s playing some card game over on the other side of the house and periodically calling me a ‘wus’. It’s adorable really. lol )

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 16:59:00 UTC

  • “PROPERTARIANISM” IS JUST A BRAND NAME Propertarianism is just a brand name for

    “PROPERTARIANISM” IS JUST A BRAND NAME

    Propertarianism is just a brand name for strictly constructed traditional anglo american constitutional law, that is an evolution of our law, that prevents the (((crimes))) invented during the twentieth century, that were used to undermine western civlization. “Propertarian” was an ‘insult’ that was levied against libertarians who reduced all questions of social science to measurement by property. Fortunately, all questions of social science, ethics and law, really are reducible to measurement by demonstrated interest that we call property. But, property, at least under our definition, is complete where under libertarianism it was insufficient. I chose the name “propertarianism” because it maintained this system of measurement, and “strictly constructed natural law of reciprocity” was too difficult a brand name. At this point I would change it to Sovereignty, or “European Traditional Natural Law.” or something else. But the ‘term’ has stuck as a brand name so it’s hard to change it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 15:40:00 UTC

  • THE THREE DEGREES OF AGREEMENT: THINK, TRUST, FEEL – AND THE VIRTUES, VICES, AND

    THE THREE DEGREES OF AGREEMENT: THINK, TRUST, FEEL – AND THE VIRTUES, VICES, AND COMMANDMENTS

    Autists need to think it, normies need to trust it, and empaths need to feel it. We all satisfy our need for understanding differently.

    All that matters is the physical law of the universe, the necessary law of evolution and transcendence, the natural law of man, the extension of natural law to the love of man, the debt we owe to nature and our ancestors. After that we need enough knowledge and skill to serve one another. and enough courage to defend one another.

    Whether you understand it, trust it, or feel it doesn’t matter.

    It’s not complicated.

    For children: “do not unto others as they would not have done unto them. do only unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

    For women, neither are the four agreements difficult:

    Agreement 1: Be Impeccable With Your Word

    Agreement 2: Don’t Take Anything Personally

    Agreement 3: Don’t Make Assumptions

    Agreement 4: Always Do Your Best

    For women, the christian virtues

    chastity

    temperance

    charity

    diligence

    patience

    kindness

    humility

    For Men, the Virtues are not difficult.

    The term “virtue” itself is derived from the Latin “virtus” (the personification of which was the deity Virtus), and had connotations of “manliness”, “honour”, worthiness of deferential respect, and civic duty as both citizen and soldier.

    The Four Greek Virtues

    Wisdom (vs cunning)

    Courage (vs victimhood)

    Moderation (epicureanism vs hedonism or asceticism)

    Justice (vs compassion)

    Doolittle’s Necessities

    Every man a craftsman (so he is not a scoundrel), a soldier (so he does his duty to his people), a warrior (so he is not a coward), Sheriff (so he defends the commons), judge (so he metes justice when he must), legislature (so he chooses his own path), and sovereign (so he takes responsibility for his actions).

    Aristotle’s Ethics

    As Aristotle says in the Nicomachean Ethics:

    “The golden mean between the extremes,

    at the right times (when),

    about the right things (what),

    towards the right people (who),

    for the right end (why),

    and in the right way (how).”

    THE VIA NEGATIVA

    THEVICES

    Pride

    Envy

    Gluttony

    Lust

    Wrath

    Greed

    Sloth

    THE CRIMES

    TEN COMMANDMENTS IN P-LAW TERMS

    (In response to James Dmitro Makienko and John Mark.)

    1 – God/Nature has given us the many laws of nature, the one natural law of man: reciprocity, and the one choice: transcendence into gods ourselves by those laws, or the end of our existence for failing.

    2 – You shall not use reciprocity falsely, or criticize reciprocity, and spread irreciprocity – this is to criticize god, god’s law, and doom mankind to failure of transcendence.

    4 – You must return your parent’s investment in you with reciprocity of obedience, respect, and care.

    5 – You shalt not commit murder – reciprocity of life cannot be restored, reciprocity of revenge cannot be unmade, and reciprocity in trust forever lost.

    6 – You shalt not commit adultery – reciprocity of the marriage promise cannot be restored.

    7 – You shalt not steal – reciprocity of goods may be restored, but reciprocity of trust cannot be restored.

    8 – You shalt not lie – reciprocity of deceit may be restored, reciprocity of harm may not be, and reciprocity of trust cannot be restored.

    9 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s wife or husband – lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of a marriage.

    10 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s property, lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of property.

    3 – One day a week you shall spend contemplating your reciprocity irreciprocity, to past, present and future kin and kith, and seek means of restitution.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 15:00:00 UTC

  • SOMETHING: DOOLITTLE on the JFG/MOLYNEUX Debate from 0:00 to 1:12:00 ( Stefan Mo

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GRzHdA3lioLEARN SOMETHING:

    DOOLITTLE on the JFG/MOLYNEUX Debate

    from 0:00 to 1:12:00

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GRzHdA3lio&

    ( Stefan Molyneux )

    NOTES PRIOR TO SHOW:

    WHY IS CURT DOOLITTLE SO HOSTILE IN REFORMING LIBERTARIANISM INTO SOVEREIGNTARIANISM?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/242127430518751

    NOTES FOR GOING ON JFG’S SHOW

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/241938667204294

    (against gariepy)

    1 – STEFAN MOLYNEUX AND AND J F GARIEPY DEBATE WAS FKING EMBARASSING

    https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=594803234449904&id=100017606988153

    2 – JFG CLEARLY DOESN’T UNDERSTAND SUPERPOSITION

    https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=594829684447259&id=100017606988153

    (against molyneux)

    3 – MORE MOLYNEUX VS JFG AND A SHORT CRITICISM OF UPB

    https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=594894601107434&id=100017606988153

    (against libertarian and right in general)

    4 – THE REST OF THE RIGHT IS INTELLECTUALLY EMBARASSING

    https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=594817174448510&id=100017606988153Updated Apr 1, 2020, 2:58 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:58:00 UTC

  • SUMMARY OF JFG/DOOLITTLE ON THE MOLYNEUX DEBATE That was fun. I always enjoy JF.

    SUMMARY OF JFG/DOOLITTLE ON THE MOLYNEUX DEBATE

    That was fun. I always enjoy JF. The public isn’t used to seeing how philosophy, law, science and math are done between practitioners – tediously precisely. I realize this kind of thing is difficult for the audience. And JF has to keep the audience engaged. Between my long expositions and jf’s audience representation it required a little cat herding on my part. That said, I think we got there.

    SUMMARY:

    (a) we are born with a distribution of moral preferences (Demand for treatment from others, and resistance to demands from other)s,

    (b) we exercise our moral preferences in a market competition for cooperation wherein we discover cooperation (sexual, social, economic, political, military) with people that satisfy our moral preferences,

    (c) groups of people increase in a division of labor and as they do so converge on moral norms (requirements for cooperation) that allow them to cooperatively succeed in their geographic, demographic, economic, institutional, and military conditions – and some of these they institute as laws (punishments for violations)

    (d) across human groups we converge on the same underlying rule within each of those different markets (e) that rule is reciprocity that preserves cooperation and prevents retaliation, within the limits of proportionality that cause members to defect.

    (e) but moral rules are only useful in creating and preserving cooperation and the outsized returns on cooperation,

    (f) and cooperation must be more beneficial than parasitism(free riding, black markets, rent seeking, corruption etc), and predation (conquest).

    (g) all human organizations of all kinds seek the minimum morality, maximum free riding, rent seeking, and corruption until there is insufficient free capital to incentivize adjustment to shocks, and the civilization collapses

    (h) so there is no moral rule outside of the utility of cooperation because ‘moral’ can only mean ‘within the limits of reciprocity and proportionality among those of us cooperating’. There is no morality in war.

    (i) the only universal moral rule is reciprocity – do not impose costs, including risks, directly or indirectly upon the demonstrated interests of others in your group.

    (j) there are no possible via positiva universal moral statements. Anything that is not immoral (reciprocal) is moral. People who claim otherwise are engaging in an act of fraud by claiming their preference must be paid for by others irreciprocally. They claim debts or injustice when there is none.

    CLOSING

    As such, JF was correct at the personal level in that all individuals demonstrate variation in moral demand of others;;

    And SM was half right at the socio-political level, and half right at the universal level, but stated the via positiva preference for a good instead of via negativa prohibition on the bad.

    In this sense both parties, adopting ideal types, rather than the use of series, talked past each other.

    P-law makes use of disambiguation through “operationalism, competition, and serialization’, and relies on the logic of incentives, supply and demand.

    We convert psychological , social, legal and political concepts into economic terms to take advantage of the minimization of error that results, at the expense of more reasoning and less intuiting.

    -Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:57:00 UTC

  • PREDATORS AND PARASITES We’re apex predators. The problem is they’re apex parasi

    PREDATORS AND PARASITES

    We’re apex predators.

    The problem is they’re apex parasites.

    Parasites are the most effective weapon against apex predators.

    That’s the narrative.

    How does one obtain restitution from the parasite?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:57:00 UTC

  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: “YOU CAN’T GET THERE FROM HERE” —“We can’t approach a

    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: “YOU CAN’T GET THERE FROM HERE”

    —“We can’t approach anything like intelligence with artificial neural networks … not in their current form.”— Hawkins

    —“All the trickly things we have done over the past seventy years hasn’t mattered – we’ve just taken advantage of moore’s law … it’s all short term gains.”— Rich Sutton (“Bitter Lesson”)

    —“If we scale up the current technology it won’t make any difference.”—

    —“You can’t mathematically model anything as complex as the brain, only mathematically explain why the biology does what it does, but it can’t be analyzed completely… it’s out of the realm of possibility. (we can build )”–

    —“Sparse Representations”–

    The neural networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons, and preparatory dendrites, compete over time to ‘announce’ a winner that’s passed forward for integration into the current hierarchy of models. Very hard to fool, very robust networks.

    —“Machine learning… the next step has to be orthogonal to what we’re doing, because we’re at its limit.”—

    —“and ANN needs a lot of data. The human brain doesn’t. It’s extremely efficient.”—

    WHY I MOVED ON FROM AI

    This is why I stopped working on AI in the 80’s. Intelligence requires completely different computer architectures. It’s interesting that I got so close with the “before(state) during(change) after(state)” data structure: sequences; and with a hierarchy of geometric representations. But at <5mhz and 64k, even working in assembly language, I could already tell that it couldn’t be done with existing computers. We would need to invert the entire architecture to millions of tiny cores with local durable memory, at low power. If I had instead written and published a paper at the time rather than ‘moving on’ I would have bragging rights today. lol.

    If we had followed turing’s advice and made logical computers rather than numerical, we would be closer. but our emphasis on mathematics (the math trap again!!!) pushed engineering of computers in the wrong direction.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:56:00 UTC

  • HIERARCHY OF NEEDS FOR ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE. —Curt, can you clarify

    HIERARCHY OF NEEDS FOR ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE.

    —Curt, can you clarify on what you mean by making logical computers instead of numerical? what would that look like vs a numerical one?”—Caesar Nguyen

    Undecidable, true, false, not 0,1.

    Logical operations not arithmetic operations.

    Build arithmetic from logical.

    HIERARCHY OF NEEDS FOR ART. GENERAL INTELLIGENCE.

    Analog (world)

    … Logical (circuits)

    … … Arithmetic (current computers)

    … … … Geometric (current video cards)

    … … … … N-Dimensional Manifolds (future computers)

    … … … … … Competitive Recursive iterations of N-dimensional Manifolds (intelligence)

    … … … … … … Symbolic-Grammatic Competitive Recursive Iterations of References to N-Dimensional Manifolds (General Intelligence)

    … … … … … … … Cooperative symbolic Symbolic-Grammatic Competitive Recursive Iterations of References to marginal indifferences in N-Dimensional Manifolds.

    The weak point in our architecture is the central processing unit.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:55:00 UTC

  • Any movement works from the fringe to the center of the movement’s maximum reach

    Any movement works from the fringe to the center of the movement’s maximum reach. People on the fringe are novelty seekers. People in the middle are solution seekers. It’s a marketing funnel. There is no difference between a movement and any other product, service, or information.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:55:00 UTC