Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. WTH is wrong with you? An axiom is a declarat

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    WTH is wrong with you? An axiom is a declaration – an ideal. A theory is a contingent explanation – a real. Logical and ideal axioms. Descriptive and real theories. They are not synonyms.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 16:10:35 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Supernatural religions produce trust in a pro

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Supernatural religions produce trust in a proxy, and by conformity predictability in one another. This is a dramatic cost reduction over the need to learn about one another sufficiently to try trust.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:46:27 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:22:36 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. SHARING MATTERS. I don’t promote. Everything

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    SHARING MATTERS. I don’t promote. Everything we do is through word of mouth. And you are the means by which we introduce others to truth, natural law and an institutional solution to our conflict. -Thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:11:28 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:08:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE RIGHT IS SIMPLE BECAUSE TRUTH IS SIMPLE I

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE RIGHT IS SIMPLE BECAUSE TRUTH IS SIMPLE

    It is not that the left is not learned, it’s that so much of what they learned is false. It’s not that the right is unlearned, it’s that what can be learned that is true is quite simple: rule of law – meaning truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets in everything produce meritocracy, eugenics, and prosperity – and every alternative does not.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:04:41 UTC

  • “The West’s egalitarianism and loss of noblesse oblige: Atheists amongst the eli

    —“The West’s egalitarianism and loss of noblesse oblige: Atheists amongst the elite will attack the concept of religion on a whim, because they don’t need it, not considering they have a duty to society by virtue of their position, and different people have different needs to function optimally.”—Graham Davies

    my only comment is that once you open up democracy you are forced into the problem of the different needs of the classes. The necessary law of the aristocracy, the fanciful philosophy of the middle, and the supernatural religion of the bottom all must somehow compete – but they cannot be made commensurable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:02:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. (Movement) Yes, there are people who attempte

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (Movement)
    Yes, there are people who attempted to co-opt me and my work for use by the degenerate right. Yes I used them as long as it was valuable. Yes it was probably a bad trade in the long term. Yes they are gone. Yes they are still coopting some of my work. No it doesn’t matter. Why? A boys club of the unaccomplished, undesirable, and mentally weak cannot scale. What can scale is practical incentives, and possible solutions. I don’t for a minute think that techies and nerds make much difference other than repeaters. What matters is the men who will fight for fun and profit, and the a sufficient body of the population that will not resist or object to the solution.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 14:56:04 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 14:51:55 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. DO NATURAL RIGHTS EXIST? NO. BUT WE CAN CREAT

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    DO NATURAL RIGHTS EXIST? NO. BUT WE CAN CREATE THEM

    1 – There exists a natural law (necessity), and that is non-imposition (reciprocity, sovereignty). We do not have a choice in this. It is the product of physical universe, and the necessity of a species capable of the pursuit of self interest as well as cooperation in that self interest.

    2 – That necessity of natural law can be expressed positively (usefully) as a collection of rights of appeal to a court (insurer) of natural law (reciprocity, sovereignty).

    3 – In that sense, we can attempt to violate natural law, or we can attempt to construct natural rights (defenses of reciprocity). While courts of the common (natural) law of tort attempt to construct natural rights under rule of law, the state attempts (constantly) to violate that natural law by the construction of legislation that violates the natural law of reciprocity.

    4 – Natural rights do not exist, but instead, natural rights (specific insurances of sovereignty) are something we can seek to create through legislation (contract), that is then enforced by the courts (insurer).

    5 – Natural Rights are not something that exists without our creation of them under the natural law of non-imposition, reciprocity, sovereignty. The are merely something we desire to produce within the natural law of reciprocity, as specific guarantees of those instances of property: life, liberty, property, and interests in the multitude of physical, normative, traditional, and institutional commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 14:50:32 UTC