Curt Doolittle shared a link.
Retweeted The Nationalist â (@Nationalist7346):
Let us make a government that does not require voting or even politicians. Where markets can be used or created to replace a voting referendum, they must. We need a market for the production of commons. Remove that monopoly from the govt and it will all click into place. ð DT.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 12:11:06 UTC
(worth repeating)
—As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.—
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 12:09:00 UTC
From Aug 01, 2018 12:30pm to Aug 01, 2018 2:30pmДля багатьох моїх друзів в Україні.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 11:13:00 UTC
THOUGHTS ON THE GERMAN POSTWAR THEORY: ORDOLIBERALISM
—“Is ordoliberalism an effective economic theory in your opinion? Why/why not?”—
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism
THE CORRECT ANSWER
Ordoliberalism refers to the state-private alliance used by Germans after world war two. The premise is for the state to extend the market such that it provides desired goods and services rather than to take over the market for the production of goods and services.
Ordoliberalism (geramn) differs from classical liberalism (anglo) just as continental law (german/french) differs from common law (anglo), in that the anglo seeks to suppress the state’s interference in the market (optimistic), and the german seeks to guard and manage the market (pragmatic to pessimistic).
The anglo model is Imperial and expansionist (seizing all growth opportunities), and the german is domestic (maximizing known wants).
The principle issue here is (a) demographic and (b) cultural. You can only conduct the german model with a martial (professional) bureaucracy and very honest people (farming). You can only conduct the anglo model when innovation is accessible (sail, piracy, conquest).
So again, there is no ‘best’ model of government, there are only organizations that satisfy wants, needs, and exploit opportunities.
The german postwar model was somewhat like the Chinese postwar model, and that is when you are ‘behind’ and want to ‘catch up’ it is a problem of organization. When you are ‘ahead’ and want to ‘stay ahead’ it’s a problem of innovation. The german model would be ‘bad’ for imperial purposes, and ‘good’ for postwar purposes.
Germans are unique because of superior and homogeneous genetics, superior political culture due to lack of a central state, superior culture due to mastering craftsmanship for production of quality products, and the professionalization of the bureaucracy in imitation of Frederick the Great – and the subsequent investment in technical education that allowed Germany to produce the scientific (rather than British empirical) revolution – from which the postwar era has so soundly benefitted. In other words, the Germans and the Japanese both pursued superior export goods as a postwar strategy – and they COULD because of genetic(demographic) and cultural superiority. This is not a strategy all peoples can pursue – they lack the genetics, culture, and institutions to do so.
As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 11:10:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 10:57:00 UTC
THE LAST WORD ON EQUALITY
We are no different from any other domesticated animal. We control domesticated animal’s reproduction and evolve them for cooperation with us (use by us). We control human animal’s reproduction and evolve them for cooperation or not.
The difference between groups is mostly sexual dimorphism, sexual maturity, and size of the underclass in relation to the upper middle class. In other words, our upper middle and upper classes do not differ because they converge on neoteny, dimorphism, intelligence and temperament and are less dependent upon peers for knowledge and decisions. Our working and lower classes diverge in lower neoteny, biased dimorphism, lower intelligence and less civil temperament.
Like anna karinnena’s families, and like the range of domesticated animals, to produce a ‘human’ requires many genetic things to go right, and if any one of them goes wrong then we are less human and more animal. As such we have domesticated one another and ourselves over millennia of demand for increasingly complex forms of cooperation.
We consider humans to be defined by communication using language, but this is just a complex form of signaling. instead, the definition of human vs animal is AGENCY.
Equality does not exist. Even when we claim it’s a necessity under dispute resolution in the law of torts, it is our property that is treated equally – not us. As such it is the equality of our property that exists under rule of law.
Everything else is both dishonest, pseudoscientific, and dysgenic. And advocacy of dysgenia is just a means of warfare and conquest on a longer time line.
We are either producing agency (humans) or reducing agency (animals).
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 10:54:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/What-might-happen-to-our-society-if-race-was-no-longer-used-as-a-form-of-identity/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=51afdcb7https://www.quora.com/What-might-happen-to-our-society-if-race-was-no-longer-used-as-a-form-of-identity/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=51afdcb7—“What might happen to our society if race was no longer used as a form of identity?”—
Your question answers itself if asked operationally with correct grammar:
–“What would be the observable consequences if people no longer predicted peoples value, neutrality and threat by visible and behavioral traits.”–
The answer is that we would cease making use of the most accurate measurement in social sciences: stereotypes, and render ourselves interpersonally blind, and as such give unlimited opportunity to people who lie, cheat, scam, and steal.
Stereotypes are the most accurate empirical measurement of display(appearance), word(thought) and deed(action) because they are tested every single day by millions and millions of us.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 10:37:00 UTC
—All nations of any scale are now fascist (intolerant) mixed economies, with minor variations in corruption and liberty.—
(worth repeating: h/t to Brandon Hayes)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 10:37:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/What-might-happen-to-our-society-if-race-was-no-longer-used-as-a-form-of-identity/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=51afdcb7—“What might happen to our society if race was no longer used as a form of identity?”—
Your question answers itself if asked operationally with correct grammar:
–“What would be the observable consequences if people no longer predicted peoples value, neutrality and threat by visible and behavioral traits.”–
The answer is that we would cease making use of the most accurate measurement in social sciences: stereotypes, and render ourselves interpersonally blind, and as such give unlimited opportunity to people who lie, cheat, scam, and steal.
Stereotypes are the most accurate empirical measurement of display(appearance), word(thought) and deed(action) because they are tested every single day by millions and millions of us.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 10:37:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/What-might-happen-to-our-society-if-race-was-no-longer-used-as-a-form-of-identity/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=51afdcb7&srid=u4Qvhttps://www.quora.com/What-might-happen-to-our-society-if-race-was-no-longer-used-as-a-form-of-identity/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=51afdcb7&srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 10:36:00 UTC