Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:30:00 UTC

  • YOU CAN”T ARGUE WITH THE LEFT. ALL WE MUST DO IS CONTINUE TO CONVERGE ON A SOLUT

    YOU CAN”T ARGUE WITH THE LEFT. ALL WE MUST DO IS CONTINUE TO CONVERGE ON A SOLUTION TO OUR SELF PRESERVATION.

    You can’t argue with the left – that’s their whole point.

    (a) they don’t believe in truth, reason, or science – only power.

    (b) This means you cannot negotiate with them only use power.

    (c) The only power that will alter the course of events is not interpersonal but martial (revolutionary)

    The left lacks agency. They have collected a series of fictions into a religion of untruth, unreason, unscience, for the pursuit of power ,- just as did the christians, jews, and muslims: they operate by SELECTIVE DENIALISM.

    The most difficult challenge for libertarians (burghers) and conservatives (aristocracy), is our exhaustion of all opportunities for truth, compromise, and exchange.

    The left has adopted the female reproductive strategy of sheer numbers regardless of quality.

    The libertarian and right adopted the male strategy of quality and competitiveness instead of numbers.

    These reproductive strategies are attempts AT SPECIATION.

    We are finally able to afford to speciate by participating in the great sort make possible by male modernity.

    There is no solution but war, and extermination, or conquest or separation.

    I prefer separation and speciation. I will accept conquest and rule if necessary – though I believe it is destructive in the long term since our people disappear whenever we rule and commingle. I will not tolerate being conquered. And I will not tolerate the consequences of conquest which will lead to yet another dark age – without a reservoir of aryans to rescue us this time.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:30:00 UTC

  • Find a woman who wants six or more children. Live where you can afford to have t

    Find a woman who wants six or more children. Live where you can afford to have them. The rest of the defectors will be outbred in three generations (90 years).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:22:00 UTC

  • ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT. —

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT.

    —“Interesting thought from Kevin MacDonald that I haven’t pondered before – many high-performing whites so aspie that they feel nothing for their people?”— John Mark

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793

    Jayman and HBDChick both suggest that we developed lower clannishness, and the research supports it. The question is why. Either the value of human life in low population density (cold), or the cold’s influence on neoteny, or both.

    Since it does not appear in the siberians/alut/amerindians (they are super predators) but it does in the east asians who have even greater neoteny than we do (to their detriment – although they use nationalism and racism as a defense against the weakness).

    I suggest that it’s more likely the result of the mixture of pastoralism agrarianism metalworking, and winters, and the downward expansion of the middle class under manorialism.

    I also suggest whites have far greater agency than any others, which is a male genetic property. This is why we differ from east asians. We have greater agency despite our parallel neoteny.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:20:00 UTC

  • ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT. —

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT.

    —“Interesting thought from Kevin MacDonald that I haven’t pondered before – many high-performing whites so aspie that they feel nothing for their people?”— John Mark

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793

    Jayman and HBDChick both suggest that we developed lower clannishness, and the research supports it. The question is why. Either the value of human life in low population density (cold), or the cold’s influence on neoteny, or both.

    Since it does not appear in the siberians/alut/amerindians (they are super predators) but it does in the east asians who have even greater neoteny than we do (to their detriment – although they use nationalism and racism as a defense against the weakness).

    I suggest that it’s more likely the result of the mixture of pastoralism agrarianism metalworking, and winters, and the downward expansion of the middle class under manorialism.

    I also suggest whites have far greater agency than any others, which is a male genetic property. This is why we differ from east asians. We have greater agency despite our parallel neoteny.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:20:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/israel-us-elections-intervention-russia-noam-chomsky-donald-trump-a8470481.html?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1532977765https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/israel-us-elections-intervention-russia-noam-chomsky-donald-trump-a8470481.html?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1532977765

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 10:41:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/israel-us-elections-intervention-russia-noam-chomsky-donald-trump-a8470481.html?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1532977765

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 10:41:00 UTC

  • (compared to most I have led an extremely lucky life other than my aspiness, hea

    (compared to most I have led an extremely lucky life other than my aspiness, health, and violent childhood. I can’t claim privilege other than genetic but I made my way on my own. You have to work very hard and be pretty smart to compete at the top. You have to work smart and invest in capital in the middle. Work hard and limit your expenses at the bottom. The major difference being that the wealthier you are the more entertainment you can manage – although you probably have less want of it. Why? The man at the top finds entertainment in his gains and wants to preserve the income stream. The man in the middle appreciates his condition and is careful with his entertainment. The man at the bottom generally bears high emotional, intellectual, and especially physical cost, and needs sedation (pain killing) to persist it. The people at the bottom who have this down are those that check out and live cheaply on light labor and the state. The problem is there are too may of them. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 10:39:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    https://www.wax-science.fr/wp-content/uploads/Sex-diff-connectome.pdfhttps://www.wax-science.fr/wp-content/uploads/Sex-diff-connectome.pdfSEX DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 10:12:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    https://www.wax-science.fr/wp-content/uploads/Sex-diff-connectome.pdfSEX DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 10:12:00 UTC