Source: Facebook

  • Untitled

    https://medium.com/s/greatescape/what-its-like-to-have-an-adhd-brain-52a7c5171d8fhttps://medium.com/s/greatescape/what-its-like-to-have-an-adhd-brain-52a7c5171d8f


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-09 09:16:00 UTC

  • NOT SURE IF THIS WAS BAIT OR NOT. I JUST DO MY JOB. —– Good afternoon Mr Dool

    NOT SURE IF THIS WAS BAIT OR NOT. I JUST DO MY JOB.

    —–

    Good afternoon Mr Doolittle,

    I understand you’re in a compromising position to answer questions of this nature so if you cant, that’s understandable. I am New Zealand student doing a study on the reasoning behind holocaust denial and was wondering if you had any specific sources or historians you thought were worth looking into. My endevours have been less fruitful than I’d hope to find sufficient sourcing, and anything you could provide me with would be greatly appreciated.

    With respect,

    [Name Withheld by Request]

    —–

    Hi. Well, the Nazi’s hate me for my positions. So I have no idea why anyone thinks I”m on the side of the lunatic fringe rather than a libertarian that specializes in truth telling and debunking falsehoods.

    1) The hard right has adopted the left’s rhetorical tactics – which isn not what anyone expected. But that’s what the ‘alt right’ reflects: adoption of hyperbole, gossip, rallying, chanting, ridicule, shaming, and propagandizing. Postmodernism taught us that truth, reason, and science are impediments to power so truth does not matter. Since the left uses this tactic, for some reason the right eventually adopted it. My opinion is that the same training that went into the millennial generation on the left, went into the right, with opposite consequences: adoption of the technique for opposite ends. And the internet gave opportunity for people less politically interested to participate in political action, the same way that cheap 19th and 20th century printing gave opportunity for people more politically interested to engage in political action.

    2) I don’t follow the ‘denier’ movement and I”m not terribly fond of the nazi era – my emphasis is in the pre and postwar rise of psuduoscience – but I do know that the holocaust story is ‘overplayed’ considerably, and that the evidence is that the nazis were imitating the Russian relocation strategy, and when the war was forced by Russia, the strategy could no longer be funded, and the natural consequences of that condition resulted in what it did. Just as the minions and millions of Russian dead were the consequence of trying to implement agrarian communism.

    3) So this is to say that the same overstatement by the postwar propagandists, and the overstatement by the alt right are just competing hyperbolic narratives – which is the natural result of adopting marxist, fascist, postmodern strategy: recursive mutual degradation of the argument.

    I mean, search Amazon for books on holocaust denial and you’ll find a lot of them. (I just did). I haven’t read any of them. And I don’t consider the subject worth my time. History always solves these questions. And when the invested generations are gone, the truth will come out one way or another. My suspicion given current discourse among historians is that, as always, historians will reduce the questions to military, political, demographic, and economic incentives. And at some point we will know the truth – or as close as history can help us discover it.

    I actually don’t care. Fascism whether left or right Won (mixed economy strong state).

    -Curt

    ——

    Thank you so much for your time and such a comprehensive answer. Very much appreciated.

    [Name Withheld]


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 09:42:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGIN OF THE SCANDINAVIAN COGNATE FOR KNOWLEDGE IS A VERB – “THE PROCESS OF

    THE ORIGIN OF THE SCANDINAVIAN COGNATE FOR KNOWLEDGE IS A VERB – “THE PROCESS OF, OR ACTION OF KNOWING”.

    Well it seems that our ancient ancestors had it right, even if the mediterraneans and medievals made it into an ideal.

    knowledge (n.)

    early 12c., cnawlece “acknowledgment of a superior, honor, worship;” for first element see know (v.). The second element is obscure, perhaps from Scandinavian and cognate with the -lock “action, process,” found in wedlock.

    From late 14c. as “capacity for knowing, understanding; familiarity;” also “fact or condition of knowing, awareness of a fact;” also “news, notice, information; learning; organized body of facts or teachings.” Sense of “sexual intercourse” is from c. 1400. Middle English also had a verb form, knoulechen “acknowledge” (c. 1200), later “find out about; recognize,” and “to have sexual intercourse with” (c. 1300); compare acknowledge.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 18:11:00 UTC

  • IS ALL KNOWLEDGE IDEOLOGICAL? There is knowledge that is correspondent, actionab

    IS ALL KNOWLEDGE IDEOLOGICAL?

    There is knowledge that is correspondent, actionable, and predictive within reality and knowledge that is non-corresponded, actionable, and non predictive, and knowledge that is non-correspondent, inactionable, and non-predictive. And all combinations thereof.

    KNOWLEDGE

    – Correspondent vs ….non correspondent (with reality)

    – Actionable …….vs …. in-actionable (by man)

    – Predictive ……..vs …..non predictive (outcomes)

    If one means all knowledge consists of paradigms that assist us in producing collective cooperation on the pursuit of ends, then that makes sense to me.

    If one means that there is more agency in non-correspondence than correspondence that is only true in the pursuit of power – which is just pursuits of rents.

    It’s not true if one has to hold power by it without perpetuating rents.

    Rulers are tediously empirical in action, even if ideological in rhetoric.

    They don’t have a choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 18:06:00 UTC

  • IF THEY WIN IT IS YOUR FAULT AND MINE. Our predecessors were optimistically tole

    IF THEY WIN IT IS YOUR FAULT AND MINE.

    Our predecessors were optimistically tolerant of the leftist agenda to destroy western civilization, its history, its institutions of natural law, its meritocracy, its aristocracy, its norms, traditions, unique family structure, and unique values of truth, science, and law.

    The only reason this is possible is because our grandparents, parents, and we, ourselves, have not, until 2001, ended our tolerance of the war against our people and our civilization.

    There is only one solution – we pay the high price of correction now, versus the low price of continuous correction in the past.

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 17:54:00 UTC

  • AND THE FREQUENCY OF SEX Television and the frequency of sex by Tyler Cowen Augu

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w24882#fromrssTELEVISION AND THE FREQUENCY OF SEX

    Television and the frequency of sex

    by Tyler Cowen August 6, 2018 at 12:42 pm in Data Source Television

    Substitutes are indeed everywhere:

    —This paper examines the association between television ownership and coital frequency using data from nearly 4 million individuals in national household surveys in 80 countries from 5 continents. The results suggest that while television may not kill your sex life, it is associated with some sex life morbidity. Under our most conservative estimate, we find that television ownership is associated with approximately a 6% reduction in the likelihood of having had sex in the past week, consistent with a small degree of substitutability between television viewing and sexual activity. Household wealth and reproductive health knowledge do not appear to be driving this association.”—

    That is from a new NBER paper by Adrienne Lucas and Nicholas Wilson.

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w24882#fromrssUpdated Aug 7, 2018, 4:14 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 16:14:00 UTC

  • AND THE FREQUENCY OF SEX Television and the frequency of sex by Tyler Cowen Augu

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w24882#fromrsshttp://www.nber.org/papers/w24882#fromrssTELEVISION AND THE FREQUENCY OF SEX

    Television and the frequency of sex

    by Tyler Cowen August 6, 2018 at 12:42 pm in Data Source Television

    Substitutes are indeed everywhere:

    —This paper examines the association between television ownership and coital frequency using data from nearly 4 million individuals in national household surveys in 80 countries from 5 continents. The results suggest that while television may not kill your sex life, it is associated with some sex life morbidity. Under our most conservative estimate, we find that television ownership is associated with approximately a 6% reduction in the likelihood of having had sex in the past week, consistent with a small degree of substitutability between television viewing and sexual activity. Household wealth and reproductive health knowledge do not appear to be driving this association.”—

    That is from a new NBER paper by Adrienne Lucas and Nicholas Wilson.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 16:14:00 UTC

  • Going to Run With This. #NoMoreApologies

    Going to Run With This.

    #NoMoreApologies


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 16:13:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 15:54:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw shared a post to Curt Doolittle’s timeline

    Eric Danelaw shared a post to Curt Doolittle’s timeline.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 15:54:00 UTC