Boys are easier to raise than girls. Really. But they are. Because we are SIMPLE.
It seems to take until women have late teenage boys before they realize that MEN ARE SIMPLE.
“Men Are Lean, Mean, Problem Solving Machines”.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-15 09:12:00 UTC
A TURK OPINES ON (RIDICULES ME AND) WESTERN CIVILIZATION
TO: Curt Doolittle
FROM: Metin Ozsavran
—“Evidence shows that, the west has no principle at all. Never had any whatsoever. Nada. Zip. Zilch. None.
What you do have in planty is PRETENSIONS. Got it? Only pretensions. I am 53, and have been living and studying the west all my life. The westerners are just slippery, spineless, swines. And you know it full well.
To have any principle, you first need to have a character, a backbone. a bottom. Remember?
Now Mr. Doo Little, which civilizations throughtout history had maximum number of homosexuals? How about prostitutes? Or Drug use? Who lies the most, regularly, with no shame whatsoever?
Think hard please Mr. Doo Little. Don’t you have any homosexuals amongst your own relatives? No drug abusers? No porn addicts? No alcoholics? Gambling addicts? Are you lilly white really? C’mon? Now compare that with western principles. Are they all compliant?
Who colonised and destroyed most countries economies, starved people to death. Knowingle spread human and farm diseases to sell drugs. This is something I live every day Doo Little. Your zionist capitalist parasites bring a new bug every few years here, then come with a new pesticide next year. Oh, but that’s not unprincipled, that’s just smart business isn’t it.
The west has no morals to begin with. Honor is a joke word for you. Especially in the yankee U.S. Is that a lie or truth Mr. Little. Don’t slip around like you will anyway. Stand upright like a real man, and take it to your face.
Are you really capable of taking a critical look at your own mistakes and shortcomings, Doo Little? C’mon be honest. For once. Try hard. Can you take honest criticism, at all? Nope, I didn’t think so either.
Only men and a minority of selected women can have true character, principle and dignity. That’s the creation’s way. It has to be that way. And it is.
The west as a whole never been a MALE culture. You are feminine. You call yourselves GENTILES for god’s frigging sake. How can you be real men? You have never been real men. You don’t know how it is.
Let me tell you how we saved our country Anatolia from you. Compare it with all and any of your own war stories: During a surprise British night Ambush, at a point our German allies could not predict but Ataturk hold with few soldiers, he declared: “I am not ordering you to fight. I am ordering you to die. During the time it takes the superior numbered enemy to kill us, other units may take our place. That is my military plan here.” If it was a western unit, they would simply defer. They would find it illogical to die there just to gain time. They would defer victory to save their lives. They would invent some supposedly logical excuse. Would they Mr. Doo Little. That is not our way. We accept death when we enlist. We give up fear at the door.
Later during our independence war, after loosing WW1, but not Anatolia and Dardanelles. Ataturk again had to order: “There is no defense line! There is a defense surface! That surface is our home!” What that translated to was no backstepping, no-regrouping. Even if a Turkish unit is surrounded with better equipped, higher numbered western units, that unit will fight to death to take as many enemy soldiers as they can to death.
Face it Mr. Doo Little. Westerners are no men, they have no character, no principle. Only lies, and pretensions. Your so called principles are made for deceit only. Just to be used as excuses, just to be broken when necessary. That is what I learned from my own British friends. Its all rhetoric, talk ammunition your principles. You have none.
Every territory vacated by Ottomans, and invaded by the west regrets it today. Ottomans were just, they were taking less taxes than their native governments. They did not order brides to spend the first night with the feodals. You forced indian students memorize meaningless logarith table just to make them hate math. You opened war on China to force them continue buying from you.
The west prostitutes, poisons, lies, and deceits. The Only real, actual western principle is this: there is no limit to how low you can go to win materially. That is not foreign to you now, is it Mr. doo little?
But you lost way too much in honor. We will see if God and world population will have mercy on you, as the time slowly approaches.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-15 08:43:00 UTC
Updated Aug 14, 2018, 10:20 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 22:20:00 UTC
Eric Danelaw shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 22:20:00 UTC
The problem is, that by and large, philosophy has been a catastrophic failure, and arguably has done far more harm than good, while science has been a profound success. Why? Because the difference between philosophizing and theorizing, is that science includes a process for conducting due diligence against error, bias, wishful-thinking, fictionalism (pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, supernaturalism) and deceit, and philosophy provides means of justifying error, bias, wishful-thinking, fictionalism and deceit. Philosophy appears in practice to consist largely of sophisms and justifications that like numerology and astrology (or Pilpul and Critique), can construct fallacious arguments in favor of anything imaginable. In this sense philosophy in retrospect appears as little more that either the literature of moral fiction, or the literature of upper middle class appeal for changes to the status quo. In other words, the only difference between religion and philosophy is the same as the difference between numerology and astrology: the justification for an arbitrary means of decidability completely discontiguous with reality. As an economist and theorist in testimony (truthful speech) a non-cursory review of history leads one to the rather obvious conclusion that most philosophers were engaged in acts of fraud. Socrates (or Marxist Critique) and Plato (or Rabbinical Pilpul), against Aristotle (evidence), Machiavelli (evidence), Bacon (empiricism), Darwin and Maxwell (science). One is far better off studying the evolution of the disciplines rather than the secular theology of philosophers — particularly the germans, who, Kant having supplied an artifice of nonsense by which to excuse Rousseau’s nonsense, send the entire germanic world into nothing but secular version of christianity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 22:18:00 UTC
by Curtus Maximus
A population needs to pay its genetic costs by letting their underclasses be filtered through nature’s grinder. The more underclasses offered up to the gods and to nature’s laws the better a population can thrive.
The earth has too much genetic debt. The time for nature to collect that debt is almost upon us because we cannot continue to witness the slow unraveling of sanity and the end of western civilization.
This is the battle that has been waged across centuries between the people that wish to protect our dead weight and the people that would gladly shed that weight to attain something greater. Basically, all of human history has been the battle between the female evolutionary strategy vs the male evolutionary strategy.
All of human history has been the battle between the matriarchy vs the patriarchy. The patriarchy is empirically better which renders the matriarchy just a lie.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 20:48:00 UTC
https://mises.org/library/natural-elites-intellectuals-and-stateUpdated Aug 14, 2018, 8:44 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 20:44:00 UTC
https://mises.org/library/natural-elites-intellectuals-and-statehttps://mises.org/library/natural-elites-intellectuals-and-state
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 20:44:00 UTC
Updated Aug 14, 2018, 8:05 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 20:05:00 UTC
Eric Danelaw shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 20:05:00 UTC