Source: Facebook

  • THE WEST IS ALREADY AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN POLYTHEISTIC We have polytheism already:

    THE WEST IS ALREADY AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN POLYTHEISTIC

    We have polytheism already: mythology, literature, history, biography, law, engineering, economics, medicine, science, mathematics, and logic. It is precisely the deconflation into markets of specialization and the different explanations of the universe and our relation to it, that provide that polytheism. Western man’s cult is the law, and always has been. His civic religion of heroic ancestor worship has been invaded by semitism, for the purpose of political conquest, and we are yet again, for the third time, trying to cast it off.

    But supernatural semitism has been evolved into pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational Semiticism (Abrahamism) in order to restore monopoly of the herd, and once again destroy the market for explanations between peoples of different abilities, that cooperate by trade using that market we call law, regardless of their differences.

    Semiticism is political warfare no different than the british selling of drugs to china – and even more evil, and always has been.

    It destroyed the ancient world and drove mankind into darkness. it destroyed egyptian civilization, mesopotamian, north african, european, and eventually greek (byzantine).

    What crime is greater than 1b dead and a thousand year dark age, then Semiticism (Abrahamism)?

    So choose Europeanism (Aristotelianism and Stoicism), Semiticism (Abrahamism), Hinduism or its reformation (Buddhism), Cinism (Confucianism).

    But of them which is demonstrably the least harmful, and most beneficial?

    Truth is enough. Literature is enough. Ancestors are enough. and all attempts at monopoly and submission are crimes against mankind.

    No more lies. Truth is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 09:38:00 UTC

  • REGARDING GANS’ GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY Someone just asked, so for those that ar

    REGARDING GANS’ GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY

    Someone just asked, so for those that are interested in such things, Eric Gans’ Generative Anthropology, is compatible and non-contradictory with Propertarianism.

    It is however a description of potential (cooperation on policy) not one of limits (resolution of differences by law), and it is narrative (literary and analogical) not operational (descriptive and scientific).

    Gans is also from the French and Marxist Critical theory schools, which explains his use of literary rather than scientific device.

    My work, particularly my work on grammars, and my work using neural economy, provide an operational explanation for the emphasis on the consequences of language.

    But I place dramatically more emphasis on truth as a competitive evolutionary advantage, and tolerance beyond the kin group as a competitive evolutionary disadvantage.

    This is the opposite of his position.

    However, when I read him I do not see falsehood, only another attempt to justify a norm rather than to create an excellence using similar understanding of the function of information that he calls language.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 09:22:00 UTC

  • WOMEN JOYFUL AND MEN NOBLE by Megan K. Usui I imagine for most men that they lov

    WOMEN JOYFUL AND MEN NOBLE

    by Megan K. Usui

    I imagine for most men that they love their women most, not when they are making them a sammie, although that’s nice and all but they love them most when they see their beauty and this is usually when a woman is in a state of joy. So provided the man has taken the noble measures of providing a frame for his woman (see my post from yesterday) that ensures his (and therefore her) stability, she can feel secure in this frame to be joyful. If we weren’t so worried about our men connecting with their nobility, thereby requiring all of these (unconscious) shit tests, we would relish in our expression of joy. Chicken or egg? Let’s not go there. Let’s just do our part and the rest will follow.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 09:13:00 UTC

  • Memories. Looking at our wedding photos from Scotland back in the day: Allora: “

    Memories.

    Looking at our wedding photos from Scotland back in the day:

    Allora: “I didn’t realize how much shorter you were than me until I saw these photos…”

    Me: “Ha. I got a ring on your finger before you figured it out.” (dances little jig )

    Her: “Eye roll.”

    Incorrigibility is charming.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 09:09:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been putting together a binder cata

    Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been putting together a binder cataloguing drug arrests in the state, and that “90-plus per cent of those pictures in my book, and it’s a three-ringed binder, are black and Hispanic people”.—-

    He is speaking truthfully.

    —“He never said the majority of criminals were black he said the ones he put in his book were but read right below that and you see the actual unbiased evidence from the FBI which shows the majority is White and only 14% were Black.”—

    I am still chasing the data. the data from maine is that 1% blacks 14% arrests.

    —“But the photos of the 51 people facing heroin or other opioid drug charges show that only 47 percent, or 24 individuals, appear to be black or Hispanic. The remaining 53 percent, or 27 people, are white”—

    So half his book … less than 5% of the population produced half his book.

    But that doesn’t tell us if the distributors are coming from ct and ny, which is what I understood him to stay. lots of spam. not much content.

    The question is why, given the state collects the data, he was compiling his own….

    So he was vastly overstating his case.

    —“The person who made the book made the racist claim. The FBI gathered the actual data that show the claim is wrong. The circumstances and the actions of the person who made the claim show the person to be racist.”—Frank Mueller

    Well you can make that claim. the data on out of state dealers is not yet available. when it is, we will see.

    —“They are talking about 2014 they have all the data.”—Frank Mueller

    I have found no data in any one’s hands that states the composition of the dealers transiting supply from NY and CT to Maine.

    So if they have the data it is not mentioned anywhere that I have found (hard to imagine it doesn’t exist). And I specialize in debunking pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational fictionalisms.

    Until I see some evidence that the man was wrong in those claims, I am assuming he is making a deduction from his study of the sample cases he referred to in his binder, and for the purpose of his hyperbolic expression (which is how conservatives demonstrate their bias for the intertemporal categorical imperatives), overstated the case.

    As in all things a sample size of less than one thousand is very hard to test. As in all things a self-selected sample size is questionable – intentional or not.

    The import trade in Heroin is largely from mexico and the import distribution network, and the end user distribution network are of different composition. As far as I know the heroin import trade from mexico remains largely a hispanic organization.

    I haven’t done any research on the NY/NJ import trade. As far as I know the end user distribution trade mirrors the demographic distribution.

    As far as I know, as always, the crime rates are highly asymmetrical cross racial groups for the simple reason that they describe the ‘ability’ distribution (median) of each group – and both groups demonstrate lower medians on the ability distribution.

    In other words, people of color are far more likely to engage in criminal activities for the simple reason that there are more of them per capita in the demographic distribution of ability that chooses black market activity, and therefore have fewer alternative options in outside of the black market we call the drug trade. And furthermore, as in all things, people of lesser ability are more likely to make errors that result in their getting caught.

    In other words as far as I know the biases are not racial in the first place but racial due to asymmetry of distributions in racial groups. ie: ashkenazim wider standard deviation than whites. East asians higher median, lower standard deviation than whites. This is just data.

    But since people rely out of necessity on stereotypes and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in the social sciences; and since we do not educate people about the inequality of the class distributions between the races, people rationally intuit that what is a class size problem is a racial problem.

    Denying it doesn’t do anything but simply drive truthful reporting underground which is why the accuracy of surveys has been in rapid decline: people simply self report the pretense of equality while demonstrating belief in inequality in their actions.

    Anyway.

    This isn’t important other than another demonstration of the fact that the herd (left/female) and the pack (right/male) are able to express their reproductive, moral, social, and cognitive biases, and that while the right understands the left but can’t imagine how they could be mistaken, the left cannot imagine the right (see Haidt). Equalitarian Herd vs Meritocratic Pack.

    So you are arguing from the position of the herd and displaying your cognitive bias, and he is arguing from the pack and displaying his but you attribute to him evil, and he attributes to you error.

    We don’t have all that much agency unfortunately.

    So we think we reason, where we are just riders on the elephant of our genetic instructions.

    —“You need to go to the FBI UCR for that year. All the data is there. Our titles and our ability do not decide this, the facts decide it. The facts are there for those who read them.”–Frank Mueller

    Not it is not. There is no data to describe the composition from the import trade from ny and ct into maine.

    If you can find it, fine. Otherwise, as I ‘ve said you’re playing the same game he is by misrepresenting the facts or even their existence in order to justify your biases.

    —“The reports from the FBI UCR cover the nation and each state. They break down All occurrences by race.”— Frank Mueller

    They do not cover the composition of the distribution network, and merely conflate arrest data. so no.

    i don’t make mistakes. its my job. 😉

    You are engaging in distortion no better than he. where he exaggerates, you obscure and justify.

    NO DIFFERENCE


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-17 14:18:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been putting together a binder cata

    Curt Doolittle —” ….since January he had been putting together a binder cataloguing drug arrests in the state, and that “90-plus per cent of those pictures in my book, and it’s a three-ringed binder, are black and Hispanic people”.—-

    He is speaking truthfully.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 17h

    Frank Mueller

    Frank Mueller Curt Doolittlehe never said the majority of criminals were black he said the ones he put in his book were but read right below that and you see the actual unbiased evidence from the FBI which shows the majority is White and only 14% were Black.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 16h

    Curt Doolittle

    Curt Doolittle i am still chasing the data. the data from maine is that 1% blacks 14% arrests.

    —“But the photos of the 51 people facing heroin or other opioid drug charges show that only 47 percent, or 24 individuals, appear to be black or Hispanic. The remaining 53 percent, or 27 people, are white”—

    so half… less than 5% produced half his book.

    but that doesn’t tell us if the distributors are coming from ct and ny, which is what I understood him to stay. lots of spam. not much content.

    the question is why, given the state collects the data, he was compiling his own….

    so he was vastly overstating his case.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 16h

    Frank Mueller

    Frank Mueller The person who made the book made the racist claim. The FBI gathered the actual data that show the claim is wrong. The circumstances and the actions of the person who made the claim show the person to be racist.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 16h

    Curt Doolittle

    Curt Doolittle well you can make that claim. the data on out of state dealers is not yet available. when it is, we will see.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 16h

    Frank Mueller

    Frank Mueller Curt Doolittle they are talking about 2014 they have all the data.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 58m

    Curt Doolittle

    Curt Doolittle Frank Mueller I have found no data in any one’s hands that states the composition of the dealers transiting supply from NY and CT to Maine. So if they have the data it is not mentioned anywhere that I have found (hard to imagine it doesn’t exist). And I specialize in debunking pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational fictionalisms. Until I see some evidence that the man was wrong in those claims, I am assuming he is making a deduction from his study of the sample cases he referred to in his binder, and for the purpose of his hyperbolic expression (which is how conservatives demonstrate their bias for the intertemporal categorical imperatives), overstated the case. As in all things a sample size of less than one thousand is very hard to test. As in all things a self-selected sample size is questionable – intentional or not.

    The import trade in Heroin is largely from mexico and the import distribution network, and the end user distribution network are of different composition. As far as I know the heroin import trade from mexico remains largely a hispanic organization.

    I haven’t done any research on the NY/NJ import trade. As far as I know the end user distribution trade mirrors the demographic distribution.

    As far as I know, as always, the the crime rates are highly asymmetrical cross racial groups for the simple reason that they describe the ‘ability’ distribution (median) of each group – and both groups demonstrate lower medians on the ability distribution.

    In other words, people of color are far more likely to engage in criminal activities for the simple reason that there are more of them per capita in the demographic distribution of ability that chooses black market activity, and therefore have fewer alternative options in outside of the black market we call the drug trade. And furthermore, as in all things, people of lesser ability are more likely to make errors that result in their getting caught.

    In other words as far as I know the biases are not racial in the first place but racial due to asymmetry of distributions in racial groups. ie: ashkenazim wider standard deviation than whites. East asians higher median, lower standard deviation than whites. This is just data.

    But since people rely out of necessity on stereotypes and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in the social sciences; and since we do not educate people about the inequality of the class distributions between the races, people rationally intuit that what is a class size problem is a racial problem.

    Denying it doesn’t do anything but simply drive truthful reporting underground which is why the accuracy of surveys has been in rapid decline: people simply self report the pretense of equality while demonstrating belief in inequality in their actions.

    Anyway. This isn’t important other than another demonstration of the fact that the herd (left/female) and the pack (right/male) are able to express their reproductive, moral, social, and cognitive biases, and that while the right understands the left but can’t imagine how they could be mistaken, the left cannot imagine the right (see Haidt). Equalitarian Herd vs Meritocratic Pack.

    So you are arguing from the position of the herd and displaying your cognitive bias, and he is arguing from the pack and displaying his but you attribute to him evil, and he attributes to you error.

    We don’t have all that much agency unfortunately.

    So we think we reason, where we are just riders on the elephant of our genetic instructions.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 21m · Edited

    Frank Mueller

    Frank Mueller You need to go to the FBI UCR for that year. All the data is there. Our titles and our ability do not decide this, the facts decide it. The facts are there for those who read them.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 19m

    Curt Doolittle

    Curt Doolittle Frank Mueller Not it is not. There is no data to describe the composition from the import trade from ny and ct into main.

    If you can find it, fine. Otherwise, as I ‘ve said you’re playing the same game he is by misrepresenting the facts or even their existence in order to justify your biases.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 17m

    Frank Mueller

    Frank Mueller Curt Doolittle the reports from the FBI UCR cover the nation and each state. They break down All occurrences by race.

    Manage

    LikeShow more reactions · Reply · 10m

    Curt Doolittle

    Curt Doolittle Frank Mueller they do not cover the composition of the distribution network, and merely conflate arrest data. so no.

    i don’t make mistakes. its my job. 😉

    you are engaging in distortion no better than he. where he exaggerates, you obscure and justify.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-17 14:08:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-17 11:52:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM: THE CENTRAL IDEA (from the introduction) The central idea is th

    PROPERTARIANISM: THE CENTRAL IDEA

    (from the introduction)

    The central idea is the completion of the scientific method, and its application to the entire spectrum of human knowledge. Although understanding the full scope of what that means isn’t at all obvious from that statement.

    The completion of the scientific method is contained in Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth (Epistemology). Acquisitionism (Psychology), Propertarianism (sociology), and Natural Law (Ethics, Politics, and Group Competitive Strategy).

    The rest of the work consists of application of that scientific method to the scope of human knowledge: “Here is the completed scientific method. If we apply the completed scientific method to the full scope of human knowledge, organized by combining categories of philosophy and social science into a single hierarchy, the result is *all of these ideas*.”

    The consequence of completing such a reformation of the scope of human knowledge, is our ability to explain not only all of human behavior, but to compare all human civilizations and explain why each excelled (The West), developed (China), fell into stasis (India), or regressed (Islam, Australian aboriginals, and possibly central africans), were conquered (far too many), or Collapsed (Mesoamericans).

    This reformation is on the same scale of the previous generations of the scientific method: aristotelian reason and stoic psychology of the late ancient world, anglo empiricism of the early modern era, anglo-germanic science of the 19th and 20th centuries, and brings the social soft-sciences from pseudoscientific into the hard sciences. But, given human defense of malinvestment in falsehoods, I suspect these arguments will take as long to propagate through our civlization as did those previous reformations of human knowledge.

    Whether you consider Propertarianism the Completed Scientific Method, Natural Law (social science), or the codification of the strategy of western civilization, depends upon your interest: intellectual (method), institutional (natural law), or anthropological (the reasons for western rapidity of progress in the ancient and modern worlds.)

    My original purpose was only to provide a scientific language for describing the group competitive and evolutionary strategy of western civlization. The result is the completion of the scientific method, an explanation for the success of the west, a reformation of human knowledge, and a Constitution of Natural Law by which any and all may live.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-17 10:22:00 UTC

  • MAPPING PROPERTARIANISM TO PHILOSOPHY AND THE SCIENCES (from the introduction) W

    MAPPING PROPERTARIANISM TO PHILOSOPHY AND THE SCIENCES

    (from the introduction)

    While propertarianism serves as an anti-philosophy system of thought, we rely upon the traditional hierarchy of categories:

    SOVEREIGNTY:

    “-From Reals to Feels-“:

    ————————–

    Metaphysics:…………….Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.)

    Psychology: ……………..Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends.

    Sociology: ………………..Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we combine information and calculate compatible means to the achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition, cooperation, and boycott.

    Ethics and Morality:..Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of Non Imposition, production, and investment.

    Epistemology: …………Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of actionable reality.

    Law: …………………………Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity.

    Politics: ……………………Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market Fascism” with tongue in cheek.)

    Strategy:………………….. Agency: Maximization of agency through Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism

    Spirituality:………………Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,…….Festival Nationalism.

    Aesthetics:……………….,Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-17 10:21:00 UTC

  • THE FIRST COMPLETE STATEMENT OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION (from the

    THE FIRST COMPLETE STATEMENT OF

    THE PHILOSOPHY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (from the Introduction)

    The Heroic Civilization.

    For reasons we are unsure of, the west combined bronze horse and wheel, and in doing so transformed from egalitarian earth worshippers to hierarchical sun worshippers. From submissive to heroic.

    Sovereignty.

    But because of their military strategy – a strategy that required large personal investments and large personal risk – they chose sovereignty: the right of the individual to act as his own legislature in his family’s affairs, as the first ‘law, rule or principle’ of their society upon which all others were to depend.

    Markets in Everything.

    The only institutional solution to choosing the strategy of sovereignty is to resort to markets in everything: relationships, marriage, production, commons, adjudication of differences, and rule. And the only means of resolving conflicts between them is the natural, judge discovered common law. In other words the only solution to sovereignty is : the absence of discretion (choice). And the only solution to the absence of choice, is rule of natural, judge-discovered law.

    The Rapidity of Suppression of Parasitism.

    The by-product of this choice of sovereignty is the rapidity with which new methods of free riding, parasitism, predation, can be suppressed – by the first case adjudicated and recorded. And secondly, the ease of expanding risk taking when such rapidity and lack of discretion is visible. And third, the trust that evolves from the consistent suppression of corruption in the state, and free riding in the commons, and parasitism and fraud in commerce, and predation by any criminal means.

    Not First but Fastest.

    In summary, the choice of sovereignty allowed the west to advance FASTER than the rest by process of DISCOVERY faster than the rest. So the West was not first, it was fastest, except in the medieval world when (like now) we were defeated by the first great lie: mysticism.

    Class Structure.

    The west has always practiced tri-partism: the estates of the realm – in one way or another. Since our origins on the steppes of Ukraine and Russia. Priests, Warriors, Laborers. We have always used the class structure ‘honestly’.

    Testimonial Truth and Deflationism.

    The west has (uniquely) practiced deconflationism (specialization) in various forms – never mixing Law, religion, and festival – and resisting the church’s usurpation of our nature worship and related festivals. We have even had in some cases, different languages for our estates of the realm: Latin, French, and German.

    Polytheistic (And PolyArgumentative).

    And so the west has always practiced polytheism of sorts: martial sovereignty, commercial rule of law, craftsman’s technology, intellectual philosophy, commoner religion, and the mythology of nature and the hearth. And each has used different forms of communication and different methods of argument.

    No Single ‘Book’.

    Because of this tripartism, this unconflated set of competing yet compatible ideas produced a very complex unwritten social order never captured in a single book in a single language using a single argument. Possibly because it could not have been until now. We simply didn’t know how. It took us hundreds of years in the ancient world, and hundreds of years in the modern to discover how to complete our single language of truthful speech: that language we call ‘science’ – a language that evolved not from our priesthood, not from our intellectuals, but from our empirical, natural, common law.

    The Great Lies of the 19th and 20th Centuries.

    Our current century and the last, and part of the previous, were victims of the same strategy that Zoroaster, Jerusalem and Mecca used against us in the ancient world: the first great lie of supernatural mysticism. We have been fighting the second great lie of pseudoscience for over a century. We are now fighting the second version of the first lie: Islam, and Islam has replaced the pseudoscience of marxists: world communism with the fundamentalist, absolutist, mysticism of religion.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-17 10:20:00 UTC