RT @curtdoolittle: @Columcilled @JMeanypants @ScottAdamsSays COULD YOU CLARIFY THE INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY VS EUROPEANISM?
I’m running in…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 19:35:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630652862647631873
VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
(Continued ….)
9) Here is what will ruin your day (‘because it ruined mine). Men achieve status through the accumulation of responsibility (capitalization). Women achieve status by evasion of responsibility (hyperconsumption). Just as there is no human behavior that cannot be reduced to the pursuit of acquisition, retention, or consumption, there is no sex difference in behavior that cannot be reduced to the search for irresponsibility and consumption IN time vs responsibility and capitalization OVER time. Likewise, women are devoted IN time, but men are loyal OVER time. In this sense, this is why relationships are returning to pre-agrarian serial monogamy with frequent ‘cheating’. So in abstract terms “women are eschewing political responsibility for personal hyperconsumption.” This is burning down civilizational capital in a genetic and cultural bonfire. But what are we to do? (Sweden,Denmark while we can afford it).
10) Civilization depends on very complex accumulated ‘technologies’ of cooperation that provide us with Pareto hierarchies and nash distributions. We have just thrown a wrench in evolution. And while we’re taking the decline in population worldwide as a good thing given the energy cost per capita of industrial-age mankind, the fact is that our entire way of life is going to collapse if we do not find a way to adapt to this ‘wrench in the works’: the breakdown of intersexual markets, due to the breakdown of intersexual value.
Great chat.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:47:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414397465063424
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUy6CU_tLLQ
NOTES:
1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429
VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
https://t.co/vWZqVceKX7
NOTES:
1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress our protective instincts. We’re also far, far, more situationally aware and rapidly reacting in the protection of children. I’ve tried to find research on why women freeze before acting.
3) Intersexual Relations: women have only one value to men, and that’s femininity. The masculinization of women on one hand and the export of jobs requiring male physical strength or mechanical intuition on the other have collapsed the mating market from both sides.
4) Roles: The collapse of reproduction isn’t sustainable. What is happening to Japan, and shortly to China and Russia, is going to happen here. Our way of life is dependent upon ‘growth’ and intergenerational redistribution. That’s GOING to end. Soon. Artificial wombs? Might be a necessity. 😉
5) “Childlike”: Males desire fertility. Youthful fertility has a higher success rate. Neoteny expresses fertility. The entire history of human evolution is driven by the preference for neoteny. And domestication emerged from neoteny. Don’t want masculine men that women universally go for if you don’t also accept that men want young fertility. I mean…. evolution has reasons so to speak. (Yes the Japanese perversion thing is really,r really, really creepy. I understand the biology of it but it’s still creepy.
6) “Competency”: Yes competency has to do with genitalia because sex differences in INTEREST manifest in the sexual distribution of competency. There is also a fairly large difference in male and female capacity for verbal empathic vs physical spacial differences. This is even evident in how men and women do math. (pictures vs models).
7) “Coddling” Men and women both coddle women. Why? Men aren’t sure why we do it. Same where women object to mansplaining, but men pretty much ignore woman-splaining twenty-four hours a day. (Many men would view this conversation as woman-splaining. And notice how this conversation is about how you feel, rather than the aggregate consequences of the transformation of reproductive production to work, production, taxation, and hyperconsumption in the absence of intergenerational reproduction. Again, Feels(individuals) vs Reals (systems)). We do this because of the sex differences in the division of the labor of TIME. Feminine empathizing IN time, and masculine systematizing OVER time. Once you understand this, it’s easy to say why men ignore women in anything not interpersonal, and women shame men for their frequent ‘stupidity’ in the interpersonal, or explaining how things work when the subject is how one feels about how they work. I mean. I find it pretty humorous in both directions. 😉
8) “Boss ????”: This is female independence and the “strong independent woman” strategy. Men have nothing left to ‘trade’. And femininity is the only value women provide that men don’t provide better. If it feels good do it. But men will adapt accordingly too. Marriage and reproduction will continue to collapse. “Society” means children, because children are a commonality, where self-gratification is a particularism. So we don’t have a ‘society’ without children and families. Nothing we can do about it. CORE ISSUE: the destruction of the intersexual marketplace for reproduction, and the reduction of costs by the two-parent family (or even extended three-generational family is even better.).
(continued in a reply …)
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:46:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229365829632
THE 5 FOUNDATIONS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
Western civ emerged on the steppe with the voluntary alliances of families of warriors and their cattle. This is the origin of democracy, rule of law, and western reason and empiricism:
0) SOVEREIGNTY: the prohibition on authority, and the requirement for concurrency of warriors, families, and clans.
1) NATURAL LAW: Tort. Given sovereignty, the requirement for voluntary reciprocity, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs against individual demonstrated interests (costs).
2) NATURAL RIGHTS, OBLIGATIONS & INALIENATIONS: Enumerating those rights that are necessary to preserve Natural Law,
3) COMMONALITY: the common law: empirical evidence of consistency in the resolution of disputes.
4) CURRENCY: Concurrency of local population (house) and concurrency of the states (senate) for legislation, and concurrency of the population of the states for the presidency (the electoral college). The system was designed to prevent ‘activist’ legislation by any group, requiring consent (via empirical test of concurrency). In other words, no group may dominate any other group. All groups must agree: the must “concurrently concur” for legislation to pass.
The common law, the constitution, the branches of government, are designed intentionally to prevent anything and everything from being enacted that creates authority, deprives people of sovereignty, and the demand for concurrency (ascent) across all the classes, populations, and states.
This is the only possible means of preserving rule of law by the natural law that preserves individual sovereignty, natural law, natural rights, and consent.
Concurrency requires all groups to agree. Had we added women to the franchise as their own group as we had the classes before them we might have prevented the use of women as the vector for hostilities between sexes, classes and races.
If you don’t understand this then:
(a) your education failed you
(b) you probably have no business stating an opinion
(c) because if you counter these requirements, you are aggressing against others, and … under Natural Law, (the science of cooperation) they will retaliate against you as the ‘outlaw’ you are.
Why?
… 1) Why don’t people commit suic***de?
… 2) Why don’t people kill one another and take their stuff.
… 3) Why don’t groups of people kill one another and take their stuff?
Answer:
…1) The opportunity for persistence (opportunity).
…2) The opportunity for the gains of cooperation.
…3) The gains of CONTINUOUS peaceful voluntary reciprocal cooperation in production are greater than MOMENTARY predation and consumption, and the risk of doing so.
If someone violates the criteria for peaceful voluntary cooperation, then 3,2, and 1, no longer apply.
And therefore the reason NOT to k*** you and yours and take your(individual and collective) stuff no longer applies.
The left tends to extend the mother-child parasitic relationship to the polity against volition of members of the polity. The right prohibits the extension of the mother-child parasitic relationship to themselves. In other words, the feminine intuition interprets the individual clans and families (packs) as a collective (herd) of necessity rather than alliance of family and clan utility.
This competition between the feminine hyperconsumptive utopian and masculine hypercapitalizing empirical, produces opportunity for cooperation. And only voluntary reciprocal cooperation preserves it.
In this sense, the Abrahamic sequence of supernatural religions and the Marxist sequence of pseudoscientific religions in this era are attempts to violate the natural law, and incentivize civil war by doing so.
Why? No criminal who justifies his or her crimes ever stops his or her criminal pursuits, unless the costs of such criminality is raised by the threat of retaliation for those crimes.
There is your lesson in the constitution and the reason for western civilization’s disproportionate success.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 02:15:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630391195250700288
LET ME HELP YOU UNDERSTAND THE WESTERN CIV
THE FOUR FOUNDATIONS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
Western civ emerged on the steppe with the voluntary alliances of families of warriers and their cattle. This is the origin of democracy, rule of law, and western reason and empiricism: the prohibition on authority, and the requirement for concurrency.
1) NATURAL LAW: Tort. Individual sovereignty, requirements for reciprocity, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs against individual demonstrated interests (interests in the legal sense as costs paid for something.)
2) NATURAL RIGHTS: those rights that are necessary to articulate to preserve Natural Law.
3) COMMONALITY: the common law: empirical evidence of consistency in the resolution of disputes.
4) CURRENCY: Concurrency of local population (house) and concurrency of the states (senate) for legislation, and concurrency of the population of the states for the presidency (the electoral college). The system was designed to prevent ‘activist’ legislation by any group, requiring consent (via empirical test of concurrency). In other words, no group may dominate any other group. All groups must agree: the must “concurrently concur” for legislation to pass.
The common law, the constitution, the branches of government, are designed intentionally to prevent anything and everything from being enacted that deprives people of sovereignty, and the demand for concurrency (ascent) across all the classes, populations, and states.
This is the only possible means of preserving rule of law by the natural law that preserves individual sovereignty, natural law, natural rights, and consent.
Concurrency requires all groups to agree. Had we added women to the franchise as their own group as we had the classes before them we might have prevented the use of women as the vector for hostilities between sexes, classes and races.
If you don’t understand this then (a) your education failed you (b) you probably have no business stating an opinion (c) because if you counter these requirements, you are aggressing against others, and … under Natural Law, (the science of cooperation) they may retaliate against you as the ‘outlaw’ you are.
Why?
… 1) Why don’t people commit suic***de?
… 2) Why don’t people kill one another and take their stuff.
… 3) Why don’t groups of people kill one another and take their stuff?
Answer:
…1) The opportunity for persistence (opportunity).
…2) The opportunity for the gains of cooperation.
…3) The gains of CONTINUOUS peaceful voluntary reciprocal cooperation in production are greater than MOMENTARY predation and consumption, and the risk of doing so.
If someone violates the criteria for peaceful voluntary cooperation, then 3,2, and 1, no longer apply.
And therefore the reason NOT to k*** you and yours and take your(individual and collective) stuff no longer applies.
The left tends to extend the mother-child parasitic relationship to the polity against volition of members of the polity. The right prohibits the extension of the mother-child parasitic relationship to themselves. In other words, the feminine intuition interprets the individual clans and families (packs) as a collective (herd) of necessity rather than alliance of family and clan utility.
This competition between the feminine hyperconsumptive utopian and masculine hypercapitalizing empirical, produces opportunity for cooperation. And only voluntary reciprocal cooperation preserves it.
In this sense, the Abrahamic sequence of supernatural religions and the Marxist sequence of pseudoscientific religions in this era are attempts to violate the natural law, and incentivize civil war by doing so.
Why? No criminal who justifies his or her crimes ever stops his or her criminal pursuits, unless the costs of such criminality is raised by the threat of retaliation for those crimes.
There is your lesson in the constitution and the reason for western civlizations’ disproportionate success.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 02:08:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630389544418770944
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630382794554716161
In Saturday’s video, I touched on the three primary errors remaining in western thought.
1) The remains of the anthropomorphic spectrum and its problems.
2) One-ness, the tendency to think of ideal people as universal, instead of survival between male-vs-female opposites.
3) From geometry, mathiness, or proof, the remaining error of justification instead of survival.
I mean, I can trace almost everything back to these three causes of subsequent error.
4) I suppose I could add ternaryism, evolutionary computation, ternary logic, and trifunctionalism and the 20 rules that explain everything but that’s a new explanation, not an error.
And yes this needs a bit of exposition, but I’m jotting it down here so I remember to do so. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 03:05:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630041427727069185
Always interesting when some midwit with an axe to grind accuses me of lack of intelligence, when all the evidence is to the contrary.
Anyway.
1) American geostrategic mission:
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1629230515893960705
2) American geostrategic reasoning
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1628812102960922624
3) American Bases… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1628994528966332416
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 02:38:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629672112746110978
Reply addressees: @Brookse32 @TEK10 @chedetofficial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629668648137928705
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1629230515893960705
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1628812102960922624
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1628994528966332416
Always interesting when some midwit with an axe to grind accuses me of lack of intelligence, when all the evidence is to the contrary.
Anyway.
1) American geostrategic mission:
https://t.co/7h1TN0Iua9
2) American geostrategic reasoning
https://t.co/FX9tTyS0LP
3) American Bases and Reasons https://t.co/GnlkFLq5PI
4) Why WWIII will be necessary if US strategy fails
https://t.co/b1S2AjToey
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 02:38:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629672112636977152
THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THE IMPEDIMENT TO WORLD PEACE
1 – The legacy agrarian empires of China, Russia, Persia(Iran), the want of empire in the middle east, and the harmful borders left over from the (dead) age of agrarian empires. And the ‘elites’ that profit from (the corruption) governing those empires.
-vs-
2 – The universal desire given the prosperity made possible by the industrial revolution, for ethic self-determination, by sovereignty that requires small, homogenous nation-states capable of low power distance, high trust, governments that produce commons for the benefit of their people, and the highest redistribution with the least competition, especially for power.
-vs-
3 – The USA/British postwar goal of preventing another world war by creating free trade, ending the necessity of agrarian empires to conquer, subjugate, ‘own’ colonies and capture trade routes. This strategy consisted of:
… (a) demanding states respect borders, free trade, and focus on economy and human rights, instead of conquest. … (b) In exchange the USA would police the world system of communication, transport and trade, and;
… (c) creating the Bretton Woods agreement, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The purpose of the agreement was to promote international economic cooperation and stability after World War II by establishing a system of fixed exchange rates and providing financial assistance to countries in need.
-vs-
4 – This policy was successful in the greatest decrease in poverty in human history. But it did not resolve ethnic-and-border disputes nor prevent the conversion of remaining agrarian empires to remain agrarian empires, but using communist justification rather than cultural or economic or pursuit of power to justify the means of conquest and government.
The American position is that all border conflicts and wants of ethnic self-determination should be solved by peaceful negotiation and separation. However, the more resource-based the economy, or the more corrupt the government, or the less developed the society, economy, and government, the more conflict that remains.
So the Americans tried to prevent empires, prevent conquest, and force peaceful pursuit of self-determination. But this was optimistic. So Americans ‘waited out the problem letting time force people to solve it themselves’.
However, conflicts and despots still arose, and Americans and allies had to defend human rights and international peace by the use of force. In most cases this kept the peace. And in other cases this was futile – or worse.
And for Americans, this resulted in the rise of world standards of living, but a decline in American standards of living. Especially opening our borders to free trade that benefits other countries but harms our laboring, working and middle classes.
So Americans have grown tired of policing the world, tired of losing our soldiers, tired of Europeans free-riding on American soldiers, working classes, and economy, while at the same time claiming they are culturally superior. Tired of a ‘thankless’ world. And Americans want to stop.
-vs-
5 – (This makes me angry) Americans sell the ‘good’ of democracy to the world. But American success is due to our rule of law and obedience to the constitution. And this obedience is partly due to American ‘religiosity’ to both faith and constitution. So, democracy is a privilege that results from producing rule of law, and respect for rule of law. Rule of law produces economies. Economies raise people out of poverty, into education and experience that makes it possible for them to possess the incentives, and knowledge, and wisdom necessary to vote ‘even a little’ intelligently.
But worse, the Jewish class Marxists moved from Europe to America, creating cultural marxism and race-marxism to undermine American culture and institutions by creating hatred and decadence. So, thos is what ‘democracy’ means to the world. Not rule of law. And they don’t want it.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 21:23:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629230515893960705
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629211195294244864
RT @ManhattanInst: NEW: @ZachG932 & @epkaufm conclude that the uncritical promotion of left-wing racial ideology in education is having a m…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 03:43:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628963682699956226