Curt Doolittle

Form: Thread

  • THE RACE AND IQ DEBATE IS OVER. FINALLY. We are done with the debate ok? Race di

    THE RACE AND IQ DEBATE IS OVER. FINALLY.
    We are done with the debate ok? Race differences in intelligence are predictable from brain function. It’s over. Thank you. Finally. No more anti-darwinian marxist nonsense please.

    Now can we get on with ‘this is largely a consequence of differences in class sizes, given class sizes are a difference in genetic load vs neotenic evolution. This is a core issue of the race problem in general: individuals make up a group. the metrics of the group reflect the distribution of individuals in the group. That doesn’t mean there aren’t smart people and dim people in every group. It means that some groups were able to (or had to) exit the reproduction of more dim (or disagreeable) people than others because of climate, resources, and geography.

    Now, there is an outlier problem that someone has already noticed int he comments, and there is some pretty heavy genetic load at the bottom of the black distribution. This needs some investigation.

    Like I said: neotenic evolution is a pretty simple single direction of human evolution. And without isolation and speciation events, it’s impossible to capture dramatic improvements. So man evolved through four isolation and speciation events until we ran out of space for isolation and speciation events.

    I can’t quite explain the siberian-american IQ, but it’s possible that the end of the ice age, plus the reverse direction of the climate as they move from north to south prohibited the otherwise visible effects of selection pressure. There is vast difference in neotenic expression in the various ethnicities of the siberian-americans (which is fascinating and diverse). But it would seem that they were so successful in the Americas that they didn’t produce a stress event – or didn’t have time to.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 02:06:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640173445299273730

  • (Advanced topic warning) a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to dis

    (Advanced topic warning)
    a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to disambiguate a reference. Or more specifically, in mathematics, to produce a set of vectors that produce a direction of causality that will influence other dimensions of causality. Ergo why we use Manifolds in mathematics to track dense causalities (relations). Our neurons are for all intents and purpose producing vast networks of cause in the manifold that is our neocortex.
    b) The universe only requires three spatial and one time dimensions to describe it. We can use either three linear or two circular(direction) and one linear (scale) dimensions as descriptors.
    c) (Very advanced topic) The universe is incapable of more than those three plus one dimensions – no more dimensions are possible without destroying the prior four.
    d) When we talk of say ten dimensions we are talking about a three step hierarchy of dimensions of causality, each that affects the others within the one time dimensions. In physics this means it is likely that there is at least one more dimension of causality (one more hierarchy of constant states) beneath the quantum background.
    e) Until we end our wasted einsteinian century ‘lost in mathiness’ (pseudoscience), by completing the classical model of the quantum background (we’re close), explaining what we call particles but aren’t (they’re closer to lightning storms that collapse as lightning bolts), and explain the cause of the quantum background we will not know if the speed of light and the mass that results as we compress the quantum background, can be overcome. I have, no one has, any sense as yet whether it’s possible. If not, and, if we cannot capture and use the energy of the quantum background (huge) even if only zero point, then we are ‘not going anywhere fast’.
    f) As such the only dimension we can likely ‘colonize’ is time. And in that sense, given relative time at mass and velocity (or even independent thereof) for all intents and purposes ‘dimensions’ (differeent rates of life histories) will be effectively infinite.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 22:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639386608200818693

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639333629477416961

  • (Advanced topic warning) a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to dis

    (Advanced topic warning)
    a) a dimension refers to a measurement necessary to disambiguate a reference. Or more specifically, in mathematics, to produce a set of vectors that produce a direction of causality that will influence other dimensions of causality. Ergo why we use Manifolds in mathematics to track dense causalities (relations). Our neurons are for all intents and purpose producing vast networks of cause in the manifold that is our neocortex.
    b) The universe only requires three spatial and one time dimensions to describe it. We can use either three linear or two circular(direction) and one linear (scale) dimensions as descriptors.
    c) (Very advanced topic) The universe is incapable of more than those three plus one dimensions – no more dimensions are possible without destroying the prior four.
    d) When we talk of say ten dimensions we are talking about a three step hierarchy of dimensions of causality, each that affects the others within the one time dimensions. In physics this means it is likely that there is at least one more dimension of causality (one more hierarchy of constant states) beneath the quantum background.
    e) Until we end our wasted einsteinian century ‘lost in mathiness’ (pseudoscience), by completing the classical model of the quantum background (we’re close), explaining what we call particles but aren’t (they’re closer to lightning storms that collapse as lightning bolts), and explain the cause of the quantum background we will not know if the speed of light and the mass that results as we compress the quantum background, can be overcome. I have, no one has, any sense as yet whether it’s possible. If not, and, if we cannot capture and use the energy of the quantum background (huge) even if only zero point, then we are ‘not going anywhere fast’.
    f) As such the only dimension we can likely ‘colonize’ is time. And in that sense, given relative time at mass and velocity (or even independent thereof) for all intents and purposes ‘dimensions’ (differeent rates of life histories) will be effectively infinite.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 22:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639386608016187393

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639333629477416961

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639375521535467532

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639375521388589057

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639374722738552833

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the peoplem in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639371443610742787

  • NO, WE CAN’T ALL JUST ‘GET ALONG’ (GLOBALLY) Nice thinking though. (a) The rest

    NO, WE CAN’T ALL JUST ‘GET ALONG’ (GLOBALLY)
    Nice thinking though.
    (a) The rest of the planet is low trust, so it wants benevolent authoritarianism and certainty to compensate for low trust of one another – and they do NOT want our political ‘doing laundry in public’ adversarial democracy – at all. None of it.
    (b) The remaining agrarian empires resist our suppression of their aggression (Russia, China, MENA/Iran). This prevents them from continuing their parasitism upon their people.
    (c) The whole world wants us to stop exporting ‘liberalism’ which is reducible to a warfare on the primacy of the family by the advocacy of decadence and hedonism. (Most of us here don’t want it either.)
    (d) They’ve already accepted consumer capitalism. The whole world has begun to understand incentives and the necessity of prices.
    (e) But we sold them democracy that’s irrelevant instead of rule of law by the natural law that’s not.
    (f) Democracy isn’t a good. It is only a temporary luxury that results from the successful implementation of rule of law by a large enough middle class to create a sustainable economy and middle-class rule.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 18:12:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638966866310823937

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638964425574215681

  • RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle @patriciamdavis @enigma3078 “capacity for is

    RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle @patriciamdavis @enigma3078 “capacity for isolation, speciation, and neotenization events that cause do…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 05:23:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638773484179341314

  • RT @curtdoolittle: Mankind faces the end of mystery limiting us to the merely un

    RT @curtdoolittle: Mankind faces the end of mystery limiting us to the merely unknown. And with that end of mystery comes the necessity of…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 19:21:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638621928893063200