Monarchy Thread
Series of posts over the past eleven months or so on why we need monarchy.
Scroll up a few for the post on why we need monarchy as badly as rule of law.
https://twitter.com/Joan4471/status/1694014084205748405
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-22 16:28:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694023764768436604
Monarchy Thread
Series of posts over the past eleven months or so on why we need monarchy.
Scroll up a few for the post on why we need monarchy as badly as rule of law.
https://t.co/Y0A4wHJtwI
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-22 16:28:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694023764701327363
Example: Disambiguation By Enumeration, Operationalization and Serialization:
|Motiviation for Imitation|: Jealousy > Envy > Imitation > Admiration > Inspiration > Aspiration
Jealousy:
Definition: Jealousy involves the fear of losing something valuable to another person, such as a relationship or affection.
Focus: The focus of jealousy is often on the relationship between three parties: the one who is jealous, the person they are jealous of, and the object of affection or attention.
Emotion: Often associated with feelings of insecurity, fear, or possessiveness.
Example: Feeling jealous when a significant other spends time with someone else.
Envy:
Definition: Envy is the desire for something that someone else possesses, such as a trait, status, ability, or possession.
Focus: The focus of envy is typically on the object or quality desired, not necessarily on the relationship with the person who has it.
Emotion: Often associated with feelings of inadequacy, longing, or resentment.
Example: Feeling envious of a colleague’s success or a friend’s new car.
Comparison:
Commonality: Both envy and jealousy involve a comparison between oneself and others and can lead to negative emotions.
Difference: Envy is about wanting something someone else has, while jealousy is about the fear of losing something to someone else.
Conclusion:
Envy and jealousy, though related, are distinct emotions. Envy focuses on desiring something someone else has, while jealousy centers on the fear of losing something to someone else.
Positive Equivalents Without Negative Connotations:
Positive equivalents without negative connotations might include admiration for qualities or achievements and contentment and security in relationships. These positive counterparts emphasize appreciation, respect, and trust rather than longing, resentment, or fear.
A term that might come closer to a positive equivalent of envy, encompassing both admiration and a desire to emulate, could be “admiration”, or “inspiration” or “aspiration.”
Admiration: This can be seen as a positive counterpart to envy. Admiration involves respect and approval for someone’s qualities or achievements without the negative longing or resentment associated with envy.Example: Admiring a friend’s talent without wishing to take it away from them.
Inspiration:
Definition: Feeling motivated and energized by someone else’s qualities, achievements, or successes, leading to a desire to pursue similar goals or develop similar skills.
Example: Being inspired by an artist’s creativity and seeking to develop one’s artistic talents.
Aspiration:
Definition: Having strong desires or ambitions to achieve something, often influenced by the admiration of others who have achieved similar goals.
Example: Aspiring to become a writer after reading the works of a favorite author.
Both inspiration and aspiration can capture the positive aspects of admiration and the desire to emulate without the negative connotations of longing or resentment that are often associated with envy. They reflect a proactive and constructive response to recognizing qualities or achievements in others that one wishes to cultivate in oneself.
Neutral Equivalents:
Imitation (Of behavior):
Definition: The act of copying or mimicking someone else’s actions, behaviors, style, or work.
Characteristics: Replicative, often involves direct copying without necessarily adding originality or personal interpretation.
Example: Imitating a behavior by reproducing it as it appears.
Comparison:
Imitation vs. Envy: Imitation involves copying someone else’s work or behavior, while envy involves desiring something someone else has. Imitation is an action, whereas envy is a feeling or desire.
Imitation vs. Jealousy: Imitation is about replication, while jealousy is about the fear of losing something to someone else. Imitation doesn’t necessarily involve relationships or emotions like jealousy does.
Commonality with Envy: Both imitation and envy can involve a focus on someone else’s qualities or possessions, but imitation is about copying, while envy is about desiring.
Difference from Jealousy: Jealousy is more complex and involves relationships and emotions that are not directly related to imitation.
Inspiration vs. Imitation: Inspiration often leads to original creations that are influenced by another’s work but not directly copied. Imitation, on the other hand, involves direct copying or replication.
Aspiration vs. Imitation: Aspiration is about setting and pursuing personal goals, often influenced by others but not necessarily involving copying. Imitation is more about replicating specific behaviors or works.
Commonality: All concepts involve a relationship to others’ qualities, achievements, or works, but they differ in how that relationship is expressed and what it leads to.
Conclusion:
While inspiration and aspiration involve positive motivations and desires influenced by others, leading to personal growth, goals, or original creations, imitation is more about direct copying or mimicking. Inspiration and aspiration often involve adding personal interpretation, creativity, or ambition, while imitation may not necessarily include those elements. The choice between these concepts depends on the context and what aspect of the relationship to others’ qualities or works is being emphasized.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-22 15:02:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694002193534443521
RT @curtdoolittle: @georgediandra2 @BladeoftheS THE SCIENCE OF THE NEED FOR THE MONARCHY
People who make statements against the monarchy ar…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 17:27:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693313743839441338
THE IMMORALITY OF THE WEST VS OUR INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT AND LAW
–“Democracy isn’t defined by the West.”–President of Rwanda
Well, that’s largely false. While…
1. Science was invented and defined by the West
2. Natural Law was invented and defined by the West
3. Rule of Law was invented and defined by the West
4. Commonality and Concurrency were invented and defined by the West.
5. Republican government was invented and defined by the West.
6. and Democracy was invented and defined by the West.
BUT…
Those are rules, procedures, and methods of producing the consent of the people, by legitimate governance, through the requirement for concurrency in legislation and voting, commonality in court resolution of disputes, including a market (court) for the prosecution of both the private sector and members of the government, thereby limiting the criminality of the private sector and the corruption of the public sector.
BUT THAT’S JUST A UNIVERSAL ‘HOW’ – NOT A PARTICULAR PEOPLE’S WHAT!!!…
The interest of different peoples in different geographies, with different resources, and different constraints, with different demographic compositions, and different stages of development, with different historical traditions, surrounded by different allies, competitors and enemies create different needs for different moral, ethical, and practical policies and laws to right past wrongs, solve past present and future problems, and bring security comfort and prosperity to the people.
THE WEST IS ONLY POLITICALLY DEVELOPED – NOT MORAL IN POLICY BY ANY MEANS
The West is going through an attempt by the postwar marxist-to-feminist-to-woke movement to undermine the civilization from within. The USA in particular, is at war internally and has been since the 1950s with the movement of postwar Marxists into the country, where they set out to use our racial conflict as a means of division. Then they converted to using women. Then to immigrants. They are trying to create the problems rampant in less developed countries in the west so that they can be ruled by corrupt, parasitic, privileged elites that the rest of the world so desperately wants to escape from.
So, the world should ignore all american and European ‘values’ that are obviously immoral and harmful and instead focus on the Anglo invention of the technologies used by our institutions that have made the people wealthy and safe: rule of law by the natural law of individual sovereignty and universal demand for reciprocity.
The USA had a mission at the end of the world wars: to end the age of empires and prevent another world war, by the use of US temporary industrial technological economic, institutional, and military superiority to create free trade, prohibit empires, promote nation states, limit governments to the improvement of the condition of their people (human rights), and prohibit the breaking of borders (aggressions).
This strategy was imperfectly executed, of course. But the result was that mankind for the first time in human history was largely raised out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, and early death. And the truth is people still hate the west for our many flaws in doing it, rather than the miracle that we managed to do it at all.
That said, and the macro level, Americans sought a moral ambition for the world.
But, domestically? Americans watched TV and played video games while the enemy with in set about the destruction of our culture, our history, our schools, our universities, our institutions, our religion, and worst of all – our families and our morals.
How moral is a civilization (anglo or European), any country in it, any people, so morally weak, decadent, and corrupt that they allow sedition and treason from within? Are Americans cowards? Lazy? Incompetent? Stupid? Ignorant? Foolishly optimistic?
In everything: take the West’s technology.
Government is a technology like any other.
That’s all.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-15 22:14:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691573996918026241
–“Democracy isn’t defined by the West.”–President of Rwanda
Well, that’s largely false. While…
1. Science was invented and defined by the West
2. Natural Law was invented and defined by the West
3. Rule of Law was invented and defined by the West
4. Commonality and Concurrency were invented and defined by the West.
5. Republican government was invented and defined by the West.
6. and Democracy was invented and defined by the West.
BUT…
Those are rules, procedures, and methods of producing the consent of the people, by legitimate governance, through the requirement for concurrency in legislation and voting, commonality in court resolution of disputes, including a market (court) for the prosecution of both the private sector and members of the government, thereby limiting the criminality of the private sector and the corruption of the public sector.
BUT THAT’S JUST A UNIVERSAL ‘HOW’ – NOT A PARTICULAR PEOPLE’S WHAT!!!…
The interest of different peoples in different geographies, with different resources, and different constraints, with different demographic compositions, and different stages of development, with different historical traditions, surrounded by different allies, competitors and enemies create different needs for different moral, ethical, and practical policies and laws to right past wrongs, solve past present and future problems, and bring security comfort and prosperity to the people.
THE WEST IS ONLY POLITICALLY DEVELOPED – NOT MORAL IN POLICY BY ANY MEANS
The West is going through an attempt by the postwar marxist-to-feminist-to-woke movement to undermine the civilization from within, and the world should ignore all american and europen ‘values’ that are obviously
immoral and harmful andand instead focus on the Anglo invention of the institutions that have made them wealthy and safe: rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity.
THe USA in particular is at war internally and has been since the 1950s with the movement of postwar Marxists into the country, where they set out to use our racial conflict as a means of division. Then they converted to using women. Then to immigrants.
So how moral is country, a people, a civilization, that is so weak that it allows sedition and treason from within?
In everything: take the west’s technology.
Government is a technology like an other.
That’ is all.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-15 22:14:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691570167426281473
RT @curtdoolittle: @RobOU812Rob @aldafa_ir @JaredAberach FIXING MARRIAGE – AND NAXALT VS DISTRIBUTIONS
There is a common cognitive bias cal…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 14:25:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688919320259354624
RT @DegenRolf: As people get older, their personality becomes more mature, with Neuroticism decreasing, while Conscientiousness and Agreeab…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 05:23:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688783034319880193
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @AutiStrike nails an important point here.
The reframing of liberals as progressives under economic and cultural globa…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 03:58:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688761469842632704
CONFIRMATION OF OUR WORK IN STUDIES CITED BY PETERSON AND SAAD (edited)
Causes of left-wing authoritarianism
1. verbal intelligence: (low to believe, high to produce)
2. being female
3. having a feminine temperament
4. wish to escape from responsibility
5. wish to be free of the constraints of pesky reality
6. dark triad, malignant narcissism (psychopaths, parasites)
Indicators:
7. facial asymmetry. Low upper body strength.
8. male left social justice warriors as sneaky f–kers (surreptitious mating). Promiscuous females.
9. having taken just one course in leftism
Culture
10. online trolls are dark triad
11. the culture online is enabling all dark traits
12. unregulated empath tolerating these behaviors
13. the willingness of the population to participate in the big lies.
Reversal
The Western experiment is an outlier – an anomaly. its easier to appreciate the West having experienced left-wing authoritarianism. High victimology scores.
Confirmation
I take all of my insights from the literature. I just explain the relationships from first irreducible principles with higher precision through the unification of the sciences. This means I explain causality, not just correlation. And that causality as a list of criteria.
As such, we can write laws to suppress causes that can’t be circumvented by words, ideology, theology, or legislation. And as such can be prosecuted in court as crimes: a science of via negative suppression of the bad without constraint on the good.
@jordanbpeterson
@GadSaad
@JonHaidt
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 00:21:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688706848558309378