RT @erikbrus25: @FerrisWindrow @TheAutistocrat @Phillip_Blond European Civ/History in 600 words!😉:
https://naturallawinstitute.com/the-history-of-european-civilization-in-600-words/
Perfect Empi…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-03 02:21:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698159227175424460
RT @erikbrus25: @FerrisWindrow @TheAutistocrat @Phillip_Blond The natural law: https://t.co/cnzCA5EcXO
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-03 02:21:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698159180035551360
RT @curtdoolittle: @ScottAdamsSays Scott, all:
1. Very likely that string theory describes some phenomenon that is expressible as a string…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-03 01:50:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698151569370365974
Scott, all:
1. Very likely that string theory describes some phenomenon that is expressible as a string in mathematics, but in physical terms is referring to the equivalent of the harmonic movement of charge, force, pressure (lightning) in the positive sense on one end of the spectrum of options, or n the negative sense, of ripples or folds in whatever constitutes the quantum background. in other words, if there is anything at all to string theory – which is doubtful, the harmonics expressed are a statistical artifact that without a model of the universe at smaller scales tells us nothing of what produces the regularity described by the vibration.
2. For reasons too complex to mention here, the universe (any universe) has three plus one dimensions because thats all its possible to construct. (Really. Think: triangles are coherent no matter what you do.) When the authors speak of ten dimensions they are speaking of measurements of forces. For example, three layers of three dimensions of force, plus one for time.
3. This would suggest there are at least one if not two further reductions in organizational structure of the universe below what constitutes the quantum background. And that the original concept of the aether while flawed is more analogous and more productive for theory generation than the einstein-bohr re-platonization of mathematics. Partly because contrary to the mathematical physicists who follow in the replatonization of mathematics, the universe appears consistent at all scales.
4. In other words, string theory like much of academic physics is organized not by Hilbert et all, as enginnering but by einstein-bohr et al, as language. and that is why physics stagnated fifty years ago. And string theory isnt physics, its math. Or what we call in economics ‘mathiness’: a fictionalism not physics. Or more pointedly, physics is to mathiness as reason to sophistry. Or less delicately: pseudoscience.
5. Science evolves with gravestones. And FWIW Eric Weinstein is applying feminine/leftst critique because he was jilted by the academy. That doesnt mean he is wrong in all of his criticism. And his suggested line of inquiry in his own theory is nothing more than that: more of the same – but not necessarily friuitless as an attempt to discover some means of measuring what we cannot yet without his suggestion. But his correct criticism lies in the economic incentives in the academy as an industry, and how lost the academy is because of their accumulated malinvestments. And how powerless we have become to reform them given their failure at self policing, combined with the mysticism they’re practicing under pretense of science thats almost as bad as the nonsense in the behavioral sciences.
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-03 00:27:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698130600098484224
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698028922867487047
TWITTER WAS THE LAST STRAW BEFORE REVOLUTION?
Here is the case we make:
1. This new CEO, Linda Yaccarino, is going to ruin Elon’s ambition for Twitter – our demand for open discourse, and, with it, place the final stamp of approval on revolution and civil war – the last straw by removing the last hope.
2. Elon’s mission to provide a public forum necessary for the presentation of participatory government by informed citizens will fail.
3. The X-Twitter platform as a political commons is a necessary public service in the preservation of participatory democracy in its conflict with the organized social construction of the ‘March through the institutions of the cultural production of western civilization and its process of, and demand for, individual responsibility in exchange for individual liberty.” Ergo, X-Twitter is necessary political infrastructure, not industry.
4. But as infrastructure masquerading as a business, X-Twitter is bound by the need for subsidy by advertising, (until it can be supported by fees) just as politicians are financed by the financial sector donors.
5. Advertisers are constrained by the undermining and cancel strategy of the left, which is repeating the Islamic means of suppression that has destroyed seven great civilizations of the ancient world and reduced them to ignorance and ashes of poverty and superstition.
6. The left’s warfare against civilization relies on the antisocial behavior of the feminine method of warfare by undermining, shrilling, shouting down, canceling, gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, and moralizing in order to evade rational argument and reasoned discourse. (See “GSRRM”)
7. So, instead, X-Twitter’s ‘SAFETY” will once again facilitate the spread of his antisocial behavior that is the primary means of undermining our institutions, our rule of law, by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, our republican government, our concurrent democratic participation. Why? Because there is no means of non-public resolution of disputes other than adversarial debate. Historically, newspapers had asked a set of competent parties to comment, then displayed both sides of an argument, and let the public decide. In some cases, there is insufficient evidence to decide (ie: the vaccine question), and we must make a pragmatic decision. But most importantly, our job is to expose evasions, denials, falsehoods, false promises, and baitings-into-hazard by propagandists.
8. Advertising and marketing programs are bound by the dominance of women in the field, their indoctrination by the academy, and the dominance of women in hyperconsumption, hypergamy, debt accumulation, spending 70% of household income, and consuming 70% of government resources while being net tax consumers subsidized by male taxpayers.
9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresponsible intolerance for truth before face, which is the principal reason that our civilization was able to produce a participatory government, the rule of law, and jury trials.
10. None of us are any longer bound by the inalienable obligation for truth before face to the public, in public, in matters public.
11. Through legal activism, we are no longer bound by the common law requirement of truth before face and reciprocity in policy in matters of public speech.
12. None of us are any longer bound by limiting ourselves to the resolution of conflict by adversarial debate before the jury refereed by a judge.
13. Through legal activism, we are no longer bound by the common law’s prohibition on conflict outside of truthful reciprocal debate or court – particularly the crimes of defamation, regardless of material impact.
14. Through legal activism against the courts we are no longer bound by demand for concurrency in voting and legislation.
15. Through the process of deliberate undermining by:
(a) majoritarian legal activism – lawfare – circumventing the legislature and the people and;
(b) enfranchisement of all, regardless of merit,
(c) direct election of the Senate instead of Senate a proxy for the governor, and;
(d) overwhelming immigration in lieu of demand for full integration and;
(e) the desperate attempt to circumvent the Electoral College as well;
… we are no longer bound by concurrency between classes and regions, with a small number of vast immigrant cities attempting to seize the continent as the north did in its war of aggression against the agrarian south.
16. As such, we are no longer bound by the common, natural, concurrent law of self-determination by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, and inalienability of duty, truth, excellence, and beauty before self, limiting us to voluntary markets for cooperation whether private or public, or truthful reciprocal debate and adversarial competition before a jury of our peers.
17. As such, as far as I can determine from the evidence:
(a) We are no longer operating under the rule of the natural law of self-determination that is the only of suppressing conflict and maximizing cooperation.
(b) We are no longer operating under the process of common law discovery of universal interests in conflict resolution.
(c) We are no longer operating under the process of voting and legislation by tests of concurrency in agreement of interests between classes and regions.
(d) Therefore, the state has failed to defend and secure our self-determination by self-determined means, by security of life, liberty, and property (demonstrated interests). And it is time for the replacement of this government and the restoration of our natural rights under our constitution of natural rights obligations and inalienations.
(e) and the demand for restitution, punishment, and prevention against those who have brought about this criminal condition by sedition and treason both with intent, self-interest at the expense of others, and failure of due diligence against participation in such crimes.
I think that’s a pretty solid case.
Let me know what YOU think.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
(reposted, with minor edits, and correcting typos)
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-02 14:16:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697976772602499072
TWITTER WAS THE LAST STRAW BEFORE REVOLUTION?
Here is the case we make:
1. This new CEO, Linda Yaccarino, is going to ruin Elon’s ambition for Twitter – our demand for open discourse, and with it, place the final stamp of approval on revolution and civil war – the last straw by removing the last hope.
2. Elon’s mission to provide a public forum necessary for the presentation of participatory government by informed citizens will fail.
3. The X-Twitter platform as a political commons is a necessary public service in the preservation of participatory democracy in its conflict with organized social construction of the ‘March through the institutions of cultural production of western civilization and its process of, and demand for, individual responsibility in exchange for individual liberty.”
Ergo, X-Twitter is political infrastructure not industry.
4. But as infrastructure masquerading as a business, X-Twitter is bound by the need for subsidy by advertising, (until it can be supported by fees) just as politicians are financed by the financial sector donors.
5. Advertisers are constrained by the undermining and cancel strategy of the left, which is repeating the Islamic means of suppression that has destroyed seven great civilizations of the ancient world and reduced them to ignorance and ashes of poverty and superstition.
6. The left’s warfare against civilization relies on the antisocial behavior of the feminine method of warfare by undermining, shrilling, shouting down, canceling, gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, and moralizing in order to evade rational argument and reasoned discourse. (See “GSRRM”)
7. So, instead, X-Twitter’s ‘SAFETY” will once again facilitate the spread of his antisocial behavior that is the primary means of undermining our institutions, our rule of law, by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, our republican government, our concurrent democratic participation. Why? Because there is no means of non-public resolution of disputes other than adversarial debate. Historically newspapers had asked a set of competent parties to comment, then displayed both sides of an argument, and let the public decide. In some cases there is insufficient evidence to decide (ie: the vaccine question) and we must make a pragmatic decision. But most importantly, our job is to expose evasions, denials, falsehoods, false promises and baitings into hazard by propagandists.
8. Advertising and marketing programs are bound by the dominance of women in the field, their indoctrination by the academy, and the dominance of women in hyperconsumption, hypergamy, debt accumulation, spending of 70% of household income, and consuming 70% of government resources, while being net tax consumers subsidized by male taxpayers.
9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresponsible intolerance or truth before face, which is the principle reason that our civilization was able to produce participatory government and rule of law and jury trials.
10. None of us are any longer bound by the inalienable obligation for truth before face to the public, in public, in matters public.
11. Through legal activism we are no longer bound by the common law requirement of truth before face, and reciprocity of exchange in matters of public speech.
12. None of us are any longer bound by limiting ourselves to resolution of conflict by adversarial debate before the jury refereed by a judge.
13. Through legal activism, we are no longer bound by the common law’s prohibition on conflict outside of truthful reciprocal debate or court – particularly the crimes of defamation regardless of material impact.
14. Through legal activism against the courts we are no longer bound by demand for concurrency in voting or legislation.
15. Through the process of deliberate undermining by:
(a) majoritarian activism and
(b) enfranchisement of all, regardless of merit,
(c) direct election of the Senate instead of Senate a proxy for the governor, and
(d) overwhelming immigration in lieu of demand for full integration, and
(e) the desperate attempt to circumvent the Electoral College as well;
… we are no longer bound by concurrency between classes and regions, with a small number of vast immigrant cities attempting to seize the continent as the north did in its war of aggression against the agrarian south.
16. As such we are no longer bound by the common, natural, concurrent law of self-determination by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, and inalienability of duty, truth, excellence, and beauty before self, limiting us to voluntary markets for cooperation whether private or public, or truthful reciprocal debate and adversarial competition before a jury of our peers.
17. As such, as far as I can determine from the evidence:
(a) We are no longer operating under the rule of the natural law of self-determination that is the only of suppressing conflict and maximizing cooperation.
(b) We are no longer operating under the process of common law discovery of universal interests in conflict resolution.
(c) We are no longer operating under the process of voting and legislation by tests of concurrency in agreement of interests between classes and regions.
(d) Therefore, the state has failed to defend and secure our self-determination by self-determined means, by security of life, liberty, and property (demonstrated interests). And it is time for the replacement of this government and the restoration of our natural rights under our constitution of natural rights obligations and inalienations.
(d) and the demand for restitution, punishment, and prevention against those who have brought about this criminal condition by sedition and treason both with intent, self-interest at the expense of others, and failure of due diligence against participation in such crimes.
I think that’s a pretty solid case.
Let me know what YOU think.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 16:37:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697649964871036929
RT @curtdoolittle: @whatifalthist Men seek advantage through knowledge of production and systems and women seek advantage through knowledge…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 21:34:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697362281577726325
CRYPTO’S FED FUTURE: A PREDICTION 11 YEARS AGO IS NOW MAINSTREAM
( Over the long term, I get it right – a lot. 😉 )
I made this point in around 2012 when libertarians asked me to disambiguate cryptocurrency and predict its future.
Peter Zeihan, (@PeterZeihan), who is now mainstream, makes the same point: that at zero cost per transaction, the fed can cut out the middleman in all of finance and banking, and deprive crypto of its income potential as other than a long-term store of value and as such a cheap gold substitute (at high enough volume). Though I am not discounting the crypto ledger.
And further, eventually, the fed can directly access accounts, and eventually use the statistics to offer specific-use credit, or even direct liquidity, even providing banking to the unfortunate ‘unbanked’ masses, bypassing all POSSIBLE attempts to make money on consumers – forcing all capital into business investment and depriving capital of the opportunity for rent-seeking on consumer income – effectively correcting the financial sector.
However, I am a little more pessimistic. Why? Because I can’t think of a reason why the fed and treasury wouldn’t combine, and then mandate all crypto be converted to fed-coins within 30 days at the current day’s market price, and then prohibit all competing crypto. Because I can guarantee you that day will come.
Will it require acts of Congress? Sure. Will Congress be able to walk away from the combination of gutting the financial sector’s influence on the State, and the windfall of credit capacity and interest income that such ‘nationalization’ would offer? Of course, Congress will vote for it. They’d be insane not to.
Crypto is a token money substitute produced from divisible shares in the crypto network. It’s a token. That’s all. FedCoin or whatever it’s called will be insured by the insurer of last resort, and have zero transaction fees. Yes it will be a token. Yes the network is technically fragile. Yes we should always maintain physical currency. And yes precious metal weights are always the money of last resort.
https://t.co/MvM7aPdw9Z
#CryptoNews
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 18:11:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697311073970307073
We are no longer training mindfulness in education because the church taught it thru feminine Semitic superstition rather than masculine European stoicism ( which is the positive discipline version of the negative version we call cognitive behavioral therapy) . In the search for human training and experience both the Greek way was and is, like all other Greek inventions, the optimum for human being because it is unlike all other methods, not false. Every other method is false. In other words, there is a science of training the mind for the optimum human experience. And the Christians destroyed it purposefully and we are still trying in modernity to resurrect it because it is compatible with both science and human experience. Because it is the science of training the human experience to tolerate the anonymity and alienation of post tribal hunter gathered human experience.
Sorry by that’s the answer. It’s just expensive so it requires the same institutional support and services as stoicism, Buddhism or any of the less desirable more false religions. Because the purpose of religion is exactly the provision of that mindfulness. So we must train the body thru sport, the intuition into mindfulness, the mind through general education, and the citizen through employable skills. So the belief we are ahead of ourselves in science is as false as it was in antiquity. Instead we are behind in non false reformation of religion that teaches mindfulness, physical fitness, and citizenship to take advantage of the innovations of science. And the obstacle is the federal control of education and the entrenched interests, particularly the negative influence of women and activists, to infantile snowflakes instead of train competent adult human beings. We do require a refirmation, but not as these and other authors suggest by further abandonment of responsibility and competence that continues our evolutionary velocity and resulting prosperity, but instead to provide training of the whole person such that we prosper and enjoy the possibilities our discoveries have provided for us.
No more regressions please. The last day age was bad enough. And we are just as close to another dark age and for the same reasons as the Romans as we are to that promised future of the first star trek series. It’s an easy choice. It’s just the choice if responsibility rather tan regression.
Cheers.
Reply addressees: @evantthompson @WiringTheBrain
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 16:41:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697288546992717824
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697280934180192718
RT @WerrellBradley: CONDUCT OF THE (ONGOING) WAR AGAINST WESTERN CIVILIZATION
Western Civilization has been under ongoing attack since bef…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 07:54:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697155808729952719